Apologies for a day-long delay. Spending a day with my family was more important than what the birthers were blathering about. *smile*
Anyway, Berg appeals the appeal in Berg v Obama II, playing the race card while at it. Dr. Orly is really wanting her military coup. Justice Alito refers Dr. Orly's sanctions appeal to the entire court. Dr. Orly is trying to get her minions to cough up $20,000 worth of paypal. And she appeals Keyes/Barnett v Obama, and oh wow does she pull the stops out on this one. Not to be outdone, Berg ups the crazy on this PR releases, claiming that Obama will be quitting "...soon". Huffington Post writes about our friends the Sovereign Citizens groups. Dr. Orly has a defeatist attitude about the Supreme Court, and more lien fun.
8 August - Philip Berg appeals the decision in the "Whistleblower" Berg v Obama case, asking for an en banc decision.
And he plays the race card to boot. (bold face mine)
"Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the first Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “Constitutional qualifications” to serve as President of the United States. The Policy of United States Attorney General Eric Holder not to prosecute “blacks” in voting rights cases should be no surprise as A.G. Holder has refused to prosecute Barack Hussein Obama in the False Claims Act [Qui Tam] case of Berg as Relator vs. Obama."
So it's not the fact that Berg v Obama II was a rehashed steaming pile of crap from Berg v Obama I, it's because Eric Holder is *gasp*, black!
Berg has, in the past, trumpeted his NAACP membership. Which hasn't stopped him from getting cozy with neo-confederates and anti-semetics, as long as they hated Obama as well. And it didn't stop him from allowing racist and hate speech on the first couple of incarnations of his site, (Obama supporters were quick to be banned, but the racists seemed to be given a free pass.) It's not usual for him to play it this bluntly.
"In the case against Obama, I set forth that Obama is not “natural born” or “naturalized” but an “illegal alien” and therefore, his term as a United States Senator from Illinois was fraud and the salary and benefits Obama received must be returned to the United States Treasury, an amount in excess of One [$1] Million Dollars. "
And so far the courts have disagreed with you.
"I base my claim on the fact that Obama was adopted/acknowledged by his step-father, Lolo Soetoro, in Indonesia and Obama’s legal name became “Barry Soetoro.” At age ten [10] when he returned to Hawaii, I allege that he did not go through U.S. Immigration on a U.S. Passport, but did so on his Indonesia Passport, therefore, an “illegal alien.” Also, I allege that “Barry Soetoro” [former Barrack Hussein Obama] has never legally changed his name and therefore, he has committed ongoing fraud by using Barrack Hussein Obama."
And you have NEVER provided any evidence to back up any of these claims, and ignored any evidence - much less US AND Indonesian law - that disproves these claims.
Maybe THAT'S why the courts keep telling you "No".
"For this reason, Berg has filed a Petition for Rehearing En Banc with the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. When a case is brought to the United States Appellate Court, the matter or a three-Judge panel hears matters complained of. When you request a rehearing En Banc, you are asking for the majority of active Circuit Judges to rehear the case En Banc."
And the answer will more than likely STILL be "No", if past history is any indication.
"Berg concluded, “If we are denied a rehearing En Banc, then I will take this Case to the U.S. Supreme Court as the issues presented are far too important not to address.”
Oh what a surprise.
The definition of "insanity" is doing something over and over again in hopes the results are different. Since the courts - and supreme court - has rejected the very same argument Berg is making several times over, it's insane to think the appeals court - and supreme court - will rule any differently. In his own way, Berg is as insane, hatefilled, and unwilling to listen to facts, as Dr. Orly is. They're two peas in a pod - which may be why they hate each other so.