Dispatches from Birtherstan - 12 January 2011

In today's dispatches, Dr. Kate is on the move. In "yes the sky is blue" news, the Pest and eFail is lying again. We have a new(ish) birtherstani lawsuit that World Nut Daily is flogging, but seems like the same old birther barf. The Pest and eFail continues to jones for a military coup and are lying again. And we have a conspiracy-laden "White Hat Report" that's less White Hat and more Brown Underpants.

10 January - Dr. Kate is on the move

"drkate
January 11, 2011 at 6:18 am
Note to Users:

This blog has been attacked and I am in the process of changing servers, removing viruses, and protecting everyone here. My apologies.

In the meantime,I have changed search engines to ‘startpage.com’ which does not grab IP’s or your history of searching. I would recommend everyone do the same!"

I suspect the movie is either to a cheaper site, or off-shore. I don't buy her "viruses" claim.

And it looks like Quantum Leap is a bit....racist.

"Quantum Leap
January 11, 2011 at 7:01 pm
See, that is why they get no respect. If they put this much energy into fixing their own homeland, they wouldn’t have a reason to be coming here, now would they?? What are they afraid of?? These cowards can’t stand up for their own country and heritage but can come here and pop sh*t about the fact that we don’t want their illegal, invading, cockroach asses here?? Damn that! Go home and fight for what is yours, not stay here and bitch about what isn’t.

It’s always Americans who have to bend over backwards for their illegals. Try protesting in the streets of Mexico, some Federali would light your ass up with an AK-47. Or they would at least throw you in some piece of shit Mexican prison."

and later:

"Quantum Leap
January 11, 2011 at 7:16 pm
See, that is why they get no respect. If they put this much energy into fixing their own homeland, they wouldn’t have a reason to be coming here, now would they?? What are they afraid of?? These cowards can’t stand up for their own country and heritage but can come here and pop sh*t about the fact that we don’t want their illegal, invading, cockroach asses here?? Damn that! Go home and fight for what is yours, not stay here and bitch about what isn’t."

And just in case the racist point was't made before.

"Quantum Leap
January 11, 2011 at 7:19 pm
See, that is why they get no respect.

If they put this much energy into fixing their own homeland, they wouldn’t have a reason to be coming here, now would they?? What are they afraid of??

These cowards can’t stand up for their own country and heritage but can come here and shoot crap about the fact that we don’t want their illegal, invading, butts here?? Damn that! Go home and fight for what is yours, not stay here and bitch about what isn’t."

As I said, racist much? Thought doubtless they'll scream I'm promoting the killing of American citizens or some other such nonsense.

11 January - Oh look, the Pest and eFail publishes lies.

"Obama’s response to the Fort Hood shooting which took place on November 5, 2009, was bizarre and totally insufficient for the magnitude of the crime. Muslim doctor and soldier, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, killed 13 fellow military personnel and wounded dozens of others. Christopher Hitchens, columnist for Vanity Fair, provided an interesting glimpse into the backdrop behind Hasan’s deadly and religion-fueled assault. And what was our putative president’s response to the Fort Hood massacre? His news conference was flippant, light-hearted replete with a “shout-out” and completely devoid of any real compassion for the slain and injured troops, and not one word of jihad or terrorism. "

Funny, I saw something far different when Obama went to Ft. Hood for the memorial service and said:

"No faith justifies these murderous and craven acts; no just and loving God looks upon them with favor," Obama told the crowd on a steamy Texas afternoon. "And for what he has done, we know that the killer will be met with justice -- in this world and the next.""

And

"The president and first lady Michelle Obama began an afternoon of consolation by meeting privately with family members of those killed last week and with those wounded in the attack and their families. Obama used his public remarks to put a human face on those who perished, victims ranging in age from 19 to 62. He also used his platform to speak indirectly to questions about whether the alleged shooter had ties to extremist Islamic ideology."

But back to the Pest and eFail's racist tirade:

"And yet, what else can we expect from that man? He serves in his office as a usurper, employs thug tactics, cavorts with criminals, lies, deceives, bows to foreign leaders, has close connections to Islam, has a demonstrated bias against Christianity, and disrespects America at every opportunity. So, FauxNews, forget about an “evolved” reaction, in which Obama supposedly learned how to emote and connect with tragedy on a visceral level between Fort Hood and Tucson. Obama will do everything in his power to shelter Islam, even to the abandoning of the troops he is in position to command. He is un-American, a shallow and empty suit with no statesmanship, no class, no common decency, no love for America and her hard-fought freedom, no respect for our Constitution and the rule of law, and no papers that legitimize him for the position he has stolen. All he has brought to the office of the presidency is a phony resume, a shady and obscure radical background, a stolen Social Security No. from a Connecticut man, rampant corruption, and a degree of partisan politics the like of which we have never seen in this country before now."

And in comments:

"ebysan says:
Tuesday, January 11, 2011 at 7:41 PM
Not only difference in Rhetoric of these Horrendous Mass Murderes but; there this a difference in the treatment of one of these Murderers!!
Why is Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan still getting his military pay after this killed 13 fellow military personnel and wounded dozens of others?…… He is a Muslim!
Why was Lt. Col Terry Lakin “stripped of his rank & military pay” because he questioned Mr. Obama’s eligibility for more than 2 years???….. He is a Christian!
Mr Obama seems to favor better treatment of Muslims."

Actually it's more simple than that:

Hassan hasn't been convicted in a court-martial yet.

Lakin was convicted.

Next?

11 January - World Nut Daily brings up a New Jersey Lawsuit against Health Care reform that was filed on the grounds that Obama really isn't president and therefore couldn't sign the act into law.

"A lot of court cases have been filed alleging that Barack Obama never qualified to become president, and therefore is occupying the Oval Office as a matter of fact, but not of law."

Yep. And so far each of those cases has been a goose egg,

"Now there's a new case that argues since Obama is not legally president, his Obamacare takeover of the nation's health-care industry should be voided.

"It is indisputable and not denied that Mr. Barack Hussein Obama Jr.'s father was a citizen of the British Commonwealth," says the lawsuit, now pending before a federal judge who is awaiting word from the Justice Department on how its lawyers want to defend against the claims.

"By law, it is undeniable Mr. Barack Hussein Obama Jr. is ineligible to hold the office of president of the United States. The framers of the Constitution when they adopted the requirement they excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born," the lawsuit says.

"Mr. Obama was born of a father who is a British subject/citizen and Obama himself was the same. The term 'natural born citizen' is defined, at least since 1758, as 'a child born in the country of parents who are citizens.' Only one of Barack Hussein Obama Jr.'s parents was a citizen at the time of his birth; in this case his mother … was/is a U.S. citizen."

The focal point of the lawsuit brought by former financial company executive Nicholas E. Purpura and Donald R. Laster Jr., acting as their own attorneys, is a request to invalidate Obamacare."

So we're seeing a de Vattelist thing here. Wonder who they copied from, Donofrio or Apuzzo.

"A timeline he's assembled reveals the case was filed in September, and the next month the plaintiffs requested a Temporary Restraining Order seeking to stop enforcement of Obamacare.

The judge ignored their request, but when attorney Ethan P. Davis asked the judge on behalf of the government to deny the TRO request, it was granted in hours.

Now the plaintiffs are seeking a summary judgment, essentially a judge's statement saying they win, because "the Justice Department filed no pleadings, responsive or otherwise, no motions, and indeed no letters until well into December," he reported."

Well, assuming that it was filed *correctly* in September, then the government had 60 days to respond, making it November. However, any mistakes the plaintiffs made would reset the clock.

And I see they're doing the Berg/Taitz thing of demanding a summary judgement.

""Plaintiffs are not arguing whether Mr. Obama was or was not born in Hawaii, though it is incumbent for this honorable court to also address that question," the plaintiffs wrote. "The question that mandates an answer, why is Mr. Obama above the law, when by law you need a birth certificate to obtain a driver's license, Social Security card and/or passports," the pleading said.

"There are other questions that demand answers: why does Mr. Obama have scores of Social Security numbers, and those numbers it has been discovered were issued by the state of Connecticut. If a fraud was perpetrated upon the American people it is a crime. Regardless, based upon the Constitution and the British citizenship of Mr. Obama's father, he, Mr. Barack Obama Jr., is constitutionally ineligible to hold the office of the president.

"Not being eligible to be president and commander in chief, Mr. Obama is currently acting without constitutional authority which is causing plaintiffs injury in fact," it said.

In support, it offered an 1875 Supreme Court decision that explained natural born citizens are accepted to be those "born in a country of parents who were its citizens."

Also cited were 1814 and 1939 cases.

"Barack Hussein Obama Sr. was a British citizen and gave his son British citizenship, Barack Hussein Obama Jr., does not meet the 'natural born citizen' requirement of Article 2, Section 1, Paragraph 5 of the contract represented by the U.S. Constitution nor was he ... alive and a citizen of the United States of America at the time the U.S. Constitution was adopted. Barack Hussein Obama Jr. is a native born or statutory citizen and is therefore ineligible to exercise the authority of the office of president of the United States and cannot sign bills into law," the case states."

Birther frittata anyone??

Thanks to "Realist" at The FogBow, we have a docket for this case (PURPURA et al v. SEBELIUS et al)

"09/20/2010 1 COMPLAINT against TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, HILDA A. SOLIS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY (Filing fee $350, receipt number TRE0005078.) JURY DEMAND., filed by DONALD R. LASTER, JR, NICHOLAS E. PURPURA. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(gxh) (Entered: 09/21/2010)

09/24/2010 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, HILDA A. SOLIS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. Issued By *Gina Hernandez-Buckley* (gxh) [MAILED TO BOTH PLAINTIFFS] (Entered: 09/24/2010)

09/27/2010 3 PROOF OF SERVICE by DONALD R. LASTER, JR, NICHOLAS E. PURPURA. (mmh) (Entered: 09/27/2010)

10/01/2010 4 AFFIDAVIT in Support of Order to Show Cause for a Restraining Order due to Extraordinary Circumstances that Require Emergency Relief by DONALD R. LASTER, JR, NICHOLAS E. PURPURA. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order to Show Cause)(gxh) (Entered: 10/01/2010)

10/04/2010 5 PROOF OF SERVICE by DONALD R. LASTER, JR, NICHOLAS E. PURPURA (mmh) (Entered: 10/06/2010)

10/07/2010 6 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Judge Freda L. Wolfson and Judge Freda L. Wolfson for all further proceedings. Judge Judge Freda L. Wolfson no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief Judge Garrett E. Brown, Jr. on 10/6/2010. (mmh) (Entered: 10/07/2010)

10/19/2010 7 NOTICE of Appearance by ETHAN PRICE DAVIS on behalf of All Defendants (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(DAVIS, ETHAN) (Entered: 10/19/2010)

10/19/2010 8 Letter from Defendants re 4 Affidavit. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(DAVIS, ETHAN) (Entered: 10/19/2010)

10/20/2010 9 ORDER that Plaintiffs' Order to Show Cause is DENIED. Signed by Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 10/20/2010. (mmh) (Entered: 10/20/2010)

10/25/2010 10 REPLY AFFIDAVIT in Support Order to Show Cause for a Restraining Order and/or Reargument for An Immediate Stay (Recall and Vacate prior denial) or Summary Judgment Violation Title 28 U.S.C. 1331 & Civil Rights by DONALD R. LASTER, JR, NICHOLAS E. PURPURA. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order to Show Cause)(mmh) (Entered: 10/25/2010)

10/28/2010 11 Letter from Defendants re 10 Affidavit,. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(DAVIS, ETHAN) (Entered: 10/28/2010)

10/29/2010 12 ORDER that Plaintiffs Order to Show Cause for a Restraining Order and orReargument for an Immediate Stay is DENIED. Signed by Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 10/29/2010. (mmh) (Entered: 10/29/2010)

11/23/2010 13 LETTER ORDER in re: Plaintiffs request of recusal. Signed by Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 11/23/2010. (mmh) (Entered: 11/23/2010)

12/06/2010 14 RESPONSE re 13 Letter Order. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(mmh) (Entered: 12/06/2010)

12/07/2010 15 LETTER ORDER in re: 14 Letter request for recusal. Signed by Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 12/7/2010. (mmh) (Entered: 12/07/2010)

12/09/2010 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment by DONALD R. LASTER, JR, NICHOLAS E. PURPURA. (mmh) (Entered: 12/09/2010)

12/09/2010 Set Deadlines as to 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Motion set for 1/3/2011 before Judge Freda L. Wolfson. The motion will be decided on the papers. No appearances required unless notified by the court. (mmh) (Entered: 12/09/2010)

12/10/2010 17 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by DONALD R. LASTER, JR, NICHOLAS E. PURPURA re 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment. (mmh) (Entered: 12/10/2010)

12/13/2010 18 AMENDED DOCUMENT by DONALD R. LASTER, JR, NICHOLAS E. PURPURA. Amendment to 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service, # 2 Envelope)(eaj) (Entered: 12/13/2010)

12/17/2010 19 Rule 7.1 Letter for extension of return date re 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, HILDA A. SOLIS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(DAVIS, ETHAN) (Entered: 12/17/2010)

12/20/2010 Reset Deadlines as to 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Motion reset for 1/18/2011 before Judge Freda L. Wolfson. The motion will be decided on the papers. No appearances required unless notified by the court. (mmh) (Entered: 12/20/2010)

12/23/2010 20 MOTION to Stay re 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment by TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, HILDA A. SOLIS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support of Stay Motion, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(DAVIS, ETHAN) (Entered: 12/23/2010)

12/28/2010 Set Deadlines as to 20 MOTION to Stay re 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment MOTION to Stay re 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Motion set for 1/18/2011 before Judge Freda L. Wolfson. The motion will be decided on the papers. No appearances required unless notified by the court. (eaj) (Entered: 12/28/2010)

01/03/2011 21 REPLY AFFIDAVIT in Opposition re 20 MOTION to Stay re 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Request for Immediate Forfeiture Against Defendants filed by DONALD R. LASTER, JR, NICHOLAS E. PURPURA. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(mmh) (Entered: 01/03/2011)

01/03/2011 22 Letter from Defendants. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order, # 2 Certificate of Service)(DAVIS, ETHAN) (Entered: 01/03/2011)

01/04/2011 23 ORDER denying 20 Motion to Stay; that Defendants' request for an extension of time until January 17, 2011 to respond to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 1/4/2011. (mmh) (Entered: 01/04/2011)

01/10/2011 24 REPLY AFFIDAVIT in Opposition to Defendants Anticipated Motion For Dismissal of the People's Motion for a Summary Judgment That Must Be Denied On the Merits and Law by DONALD R. LASTER, JR, NICHOLAS E. PURPURA. (Attachments: # 1 Clerk Letter)(mmh) (Entered: 01/10/2011)"

So the Government had until 20 November to respond (60 days for Government officials). The docket shows an attempt to get a restraining order on 1 October, an appearance by an attorney for the defendants on 19 October, and that the Plaintiff's Order to Show Cause was denied on 20 October (refiled on 25 October, denied again on 29 October). It also looks like they asked the Judge to recuse herself at one point. So yes, it looks like some flaws that "reset the clock". The Government asked for a extension of return date on 17 December. and filed a motion to stay on 23 December. The judge granted the extension, extending it to 17 January.

"Conservapedia" has an entry on this case.

"Nicholas E. Purpura and Donald R. Laster, Jr, the originating plaintiffs, are two activists belonging, respectively, to the Jersey Shore Tea Party Patriots organization and to Ocean County Citizens for Freedom, two organizations that are part of the larger Tea Party Movement. They are reticent to discuss their own backgrounds but have shown to be as expert in constitutional law, United States Supreme Court case law, and federal civil procedure as one can be without having any formal legal education or training."

The Jersey Shore Tea Party has a webpage on this case too, where they ask people to join the lawsuit.

And we have a Scribd link to the initial filing. It's 44 pages, starts with a "We The People" in an Olde English font, and barfs up almost every talking point from the previous failed birther lawsuits, starting on page 18.

"It is indisputable and not denied that Mr. Barack Hussein Obama Jr's father was a citizen of the British Commonwealth. By law, it is undeniable Mr. Barack Hussein Obama Jr is ineligible to hold the office of President of this United States."

Funny how they don't cite the law in question, eh? Maybe because such a law doesn't exist?

"The term "natural born citizen" is defined, at least since 1758, as "a child born in the country of parents who are citizens."

De Vattelists.

"Plaintiffs are not arguing whether Mr. Obama was or was not born in Hawaii, though it is incumbent for this Honorable Court to also address that question."

So it's not important, but they want the courts to answer it anyway??

"Mr. Obama has expended in excess of one point seven million dollars to have the State of Hawaii seal his records."

Where's the proof?

"The question that mandates an answer, why is Mr. Obama above the law, when by law you need a birth certificate to obtain a driver's licenses, Social Security card and/or passports. They are also used extensively for employment purposes, to obtain benefits or other documents, to assist in determining eligibility for public assistance and other benefits, to enroll children in school and as proof of age eligibility for sports and other age-restricted activities."

Maybe because he has, and people refuse to accept it as such?

"There are other questions that demand answers; why does Mr. Obama have scores of Social security numbers, and those numbers it has been discovered were issued by the State of Connecticut. If a fraud was perpetrated upon the American people it is a crime."

Ah, I see they swiped Dr. Orly's claims as well.

Nicholas Purpura has his own interesting legal history, dragging out a divorce for 21 *years*

"It has raged for more than 21 years and cost hundreds of thousands of dollars, but now New York's "War of the Roses" — the state's longest and most bitter divorce action — is lurching to an end.

Nicholas Purpura, 62, a former partner at Wall Street powerhouse Bear Stearns, and his ex-wife Barbara have been slugging it out since 1983 in a fight over assets that has spawned thousands of hours of courtroom testimony.

The couple have been legally divorced since 1988, but the battle has endured another 17 years.

Along the way, Purpura vs. Purpura has gotten so nasty that she sued him for abandonment, and he countersued for "cruel and inhumane treatment."

He's accused her of "humiliating and demeaning" him, and calling him a "bozo" in front of the kids. She's countered in court papers that her ex blitzed the court system with an avalanche of suspect legal motions and appeals — even to the point of submitting phony bankruptcy records — to stop her from getting his cash.

The battle has lasted so long that four of the dozens of jurists who've heard evidence have since died."

11 January - And more Pest and eFail Lies called "facts".

"All U. S. military personal and every other American under oath to protect and defend the U. S. Constitution will be duty bound to remove the fraudulent usurper. This situation is REGARDLESS of votes, electors, media blackouts, high profile embarrassments, state court decisions, supreme court actions or inaction, birth certificates real or forged, or any other documents — Obama can NOT LEGALLY BE The US President.

No documentation is required. Everyone should understand and KNOW the answer to the question of what country is the country of which Obama was a natural born citizen. It is IMPOSSIBLE for Barry Obama, Barry Soetoro, or Barack Hussein Obama II, to be a natural born United States citizen. Obama can NOT POSSIBLY be a “natural born citizen” of the U. S. because his father, Barack Hussein Obama Senior, was a subject of Great Britain and a citizen of Kenya."

"Wahhh! Why haven't we had our military coup?? I WANT MY MILITARY COUP!!!"

Fact:
Obama’s first act as President, Executive Order 13489 banning release of any of his records.

Lie: Executive Order 13489, which was almost word for word the same as an Executive Order Reagan signed, applies to Presidential records only and actually revokes far a more secretive and restrictive Executive Order GW Bush signed into law.

"It’s time to put an end to Obama’s Free Pass and make him accountable. Anything less is unacceptable."

Wonder how the writer plans to do that??

11 January - The Fake Examiner (in this case, Christopher Collins of the "Paulding County Republican Examiner") reports on the supposed threats to Margaret Hemenway.

"Paulding County Republicans and birthers need to be on guard due to an unknown group calling itself, Militant Association of Democrats who sent letters, placed phone calls as well as death threats that included the words GOP and birthers through a sniper scope to the American Patriot Foundation.

Two anonymous letters sent to APF from Richmond, Va. place "GOP" and "Birthers" in the crosshairs of a rifle scope alongside the exhortation "Load 'em Up!" These letters claim to be sent by a group called "Militant Association of Democrats," which says "We are Second Amendment Democrats!"

11 January - Dr. Kate raves about something called the "White Hat Report #* - The end of Obama's Presidency"

"From the moment Barrack Hussein Obama announced he was a candidate for the office of the President, his credentials have been under constant and considerable scrutiny by the finest Constitutional legal minds in our Country. "

Who all said he was eligible. On the other hand, a flock of disbarred or sanctioned attorneys, on-line law school graduates, experts in dogbite and DUI cases, and other assorted flakes have tried screaming "he's not he's not he's NOT!!", and the courts keep telling them "no."

"As we stated in our last report, about 18 months ago at a college public speaking engagement, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts was confronted by Dr. Orly Taitz with a suitcase of 350,000 confirmed signatures from World Net Daily and other sources. Dr. Taitz asked the Supreme Court to hear the complaints about Obama's required credentials including his status as a natural born citizen of the United States of America since he was not properly vetted for the Presidency due to the wrangling of Obama's special interest friends"

And was led out of the room for disrupting the conference.

"Chief Justice Roberts promised Dr. Taitz publicly he would review the information. It appears that Roberts kept his promise as the matter was heard before the Supreme Court Justices on Friday, January 7th, 2011."

And Dr. Orly was, once again, told "no".

"Obama does not have the ability to prove and cannot provide a certified document providing for a true birth certificate for any of the American states. "

Funny how the State of Hawaii disagrees with you.

"From extremely high and very credible sources within the Judicial system,"

Chief Justice Snap, and Associate Justices Crackle and Pop. Associate Justice Toucan Sam delivered a dissenting opinion.

"...it has been reported that Obama and his legal team lost their arguments to have this case dismissed. The Court heard the applicable arguments from each side and held, in short form; the Obama did not meet the residency requirements as set forth in the Constitutional of the United States of America. A preliminary vote in favor of the Plaintiff was taken, with Associate Justice Elena Kagan not voting due to her previous political relationship and involvement with Obama's birth certification issues."

Funny how Dr. Orly was told "no" then.

"The Supreme Court is holding on to the decision and will not publish its decision for the sake of the American political process. "

Oh, nice one! "The Supreme Court has ruled Obama inelgible, but they won't publish the opinion due to politcial pressure"

Riiiiggggghhhhhhtttttttttt

"Review previous White Hat reports. The proof of these allegations exists. Hence, we know the following"

You do??

"1. The Supreme Court is holding on to its decision and not publishing due to the damage it would do."

See above

"2. It has been opined that Obama in the near future will resign from the Office of The Presidency. The political machine is now determining how to spin his resignation so the American people can grasp something simpler than he never had the credentials to serve as President. The reason will not be his birth certificate issue. "

Expect him to leave office sometime in January of 2013 or 2017.

"4. One possible scenario would be for Biden to step down first, due to his well publicized participation with George Bush Senior, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, and Mitt Romney in the theft of Falcone's funds or due to the political spin of his alleged brain cancer... whichever works best. Obama will appoint Hillary Clinton as Vice President. Obama steps down and Hillary becomes President. The Clinton machine has always wanted Hillary as President. If this happens, the information on the funds she has stolen will become exposed. The funds that Hillary took are substantially greater than the amount Biden took. Remember that Hillary bribed Biden per Bush Senior's request."

Ah, the "Clintons are behind this!" claim.

Oh, and it's interesting to note the "proof" they provide is the fake Kenyan birth certificate produced by convicted felon and forger Lucas Smith.

Comments

[KenyanBornObamAcorn]

Wow, FogBlow is a bunch of friggin cry babies...
WAH WAH WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

[Patrick McKinnion]

Tracy - I see you've made it over to here.

You might want to check out the "Birther Mythbusting" section towards the top, since a lot of the claims you were making at FogBow are debunked up there.

Oh, and my two commenting rules are

No Spam
No posting of personal information.

[Dallasite]

Awww, poor Tracy. Upset that Fogbowers won't buy into your insane birther BS? I'm sure Pat's posters won't be any more interested. Good luck though! And God Bless!

[NBC]

Poor Tracy, she'd rather believe some foreign rags than the COLB and official statements by the DOH of Hawaii.

Why does she hate our President so much.

[Patrick McKinnion]

NBC - Well, remember that she seems to think that foreign law trumps US law for purposes of stating US citizenship.

So one could ask why she hates America so much.

[NBC]

NBC - Well, remember that she seems to think that foreign law trumps US law for purposes of stating US citizenship.

So one could ask why she hates America so much.

Well for someone who believes that Law of Nations apply to who is a US citizen then she is in fact arguing that the US has abandoned its right to determine who are its citizens.... The Founders would never have allowed for such follies.

[ellid]

Oh God. THAT person again.

*rolls eyes*

[DaveH]

I think Tracy needs a hug. So who's it gonna be?

[Shay]

"They are reticent to discuss their own backgrounds but have shown to be as expert in constitutional law, United States Supreme Court case law, and federal civil procedure as one can be without having any formal legal education or training."

And I'm as expert in flying an F/A-18 as one can be without any formal avionics education or pilot training.

[G]

Wow. The birther delusions just get more and more detached from reality... how predictably sad.

[The Magic M]

> but have shown to be as expert in constitutional law, United States Supreme Court case law, and federal civil procedure as one can be without having any formal legal education or training

Then one must necessarily conclude that "without having any formal legal education or training", anyone's expertise in these fields of law must be zilch, or slightly less than that.

Actually, there are pro se litigants who do a better job than the average lawyer, but this lawsuit clearly shows they have no idea of even the most basic procedures, let alone the law.

I always shake my head sadly when I see these filings filled with accusations and allegations and not an iota of proof. It's like saying "my neighbour can attest to the truth of anything I say" instead of "Mr Puckett promised me on January 2nd, 2011, to sell me his house. Proof: Testimony of Ralph Xylophony, 12345 Evergreen Terrace; affidavit attached hereto as Appendix A2". Heck, even I can get that right and I know most of US law from watching Matlock! *lol*