In today's dispatches, another call for "patriots" to walk like an Egyptian. Seditionist Neil Turner is losing his love for Allen West. Sharon Rondeau has a mad because someone DARED to call her for what she is - an anti-American seditionist fomenting treason. The Senate version of Arizona's birther bill seems to be dead.
We have some polling showing why the GOP continues to play flirty games with the birttherstani. Dr. Orly shows the maturity level of a mean 12 year old. And the court tells Pam Barnett "No, you can't have new judge, not yours".
11 February - At Canada Free Press (funny how these "patriots" always seem to need places like Pravda Online, The European Union Times, and Canada Free Press to back them up), Harry Riley demands that Obama step down - or they'll try a million moron march.
"It’s beyond time for Americans that love our nation, our constitution, republic principles to indeed make a stand…...we should take a lesson from the Egyptian grievance process.
Is the time March 19, 2011, in D.C. or some other date, but America, if we are ever going to throw Obama and his destructive policies, activity, and unconstitutional direction out of power before 2012, we will have to do it like the Egyptians.
That means plan to be in DC for however long it takes to cause Obama to validate his credentials to serve as president; demand the US Congress stop all the spending driving America toward destruction; demand the US Supreme Court investigate and verify Barack Obama in accordance with Article 2, Section 1 of the US Constitution with regard to qualification…..but then again we know his father was a British/Kenya citizen which makes Obama a dual citizen, not of “natural citizen birth” thus ineligible to serve as president. The only way we will ever get the US congress and US Supreme Court to act is field millions of peaceful Americans in Washington, D.C. for as long as it takes. This number would totally bring Washington D.C. to a halt…...a stand-still.
Just like the Egyptian grievance event, no planning beyond a rally point, identifying a date, suggesting signs/placards/banners and show up in Washington D.C. with all intentions to stay there until our demands are satisfied.
When will it be? Some are already working on March 19, 2011, and likely many of us will be there…....the question…can this develop into a “America Demands Truth and Constitutional Accountability” moment??
It will take serious thought and serious patriots…..and remember, March in DC is not warm…...... "
Based on past rallies, they should get a total in the tens, maybe the hundreds.
14 February - Seditionist Neil Turner seems to be losing his man-crush on Rep. Allen West because West hasn't removed the scary black man from the White House yet.
"You said: “We cannot give Constitutional rights to terrorists while we imprison soldiers for killing terrorists.”
But you failed to say: “We cannot give Constitutional rights to the muslim Usurper and his cohorts (aka terrorists) in our White House, while we imprison fellow decorated officers (like LTC Lakin) for questioning the ‘killing’ of our Constitution!”
Translation: "Wahhh!"
"Representative West, NOW IS THE TIME for you and your fellow Congress-members to speak and to act, lest you all be chargeable with misprision of TREASON. The Truth will set us all FREE."
"Wahhh! You better do what I say or I'll call you a treasonist poopy-head and YOU'LL BE SORRY!!!"
And in comments:
"Ed '74 says: Monday, February 14, 2011 at 10:44 PMIf the dam ever breaks on Obama, then everyone will jump on the bandwagon as if they were on the right side all the time.
Anyone with two brain cells knows that he is a usurper, he is in no way a natural born citizen. "
Actually I think you need less than two functioning brain cells to believe that. Not to mention a major amount of willful ignorance.
Oh and lookie:
"Bob1939 says:
Monday, February 14, 2011 at 10:03 PM
"...If we have any intention of stopping this madness, then we had better mobilize, get off our butts, and make a dedicate effort to attend a peaceful and meaningful rally, as was just observed in Egypt, and as is discussed by Col Riley, for March 19th, 2011, in Washington, D.C., per the following link… http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/33227 . If one and a half million were to attend, then this would indeed get the results we require, and enable us to overhaul our existing, wasteful and tyrannical system, which is what our “Founding Fathers” were very-much aware of, and tried desperately to spare us of this agony. BETTER AGONY NOW – THAN MOST ASSUREDLY LATER. NOW IS STILL TIME TO SEE THE LIGHT but it is obviously already too late for the likes of Iran, Russia, Venezuela, Cuba, Palestine, Lebanon, Ethiopia, etc, etc, etc….."
And:
"Neil Turner says:
Tuesday, February 15, 2011 at 12:29 AM
dotdotcom;
Yes, it really is sad. ‘my’ buddy Issa and his entire Committee of 23 members were all formally served with the transcripts of the CIA COLUMBIA OBAMA Sedition & Treason TRIAL in January of this year (www.CRS-Reports.org).
Now none of them can say they ‘did not know’, and are therefore all chargeable with misprision of TREASON. All we need is ‘ENFORCEMENT’. Perhaps The Republic for the United States of America can do just that."
So not only does he think Manning's fake trial has any validity, but he's expecting the secret cRAP masters to come to save the country.
14 February - This is funny. Seems Sharon Rondeau has her panties in a knot because Bill Bowman called her a - wait for it - a "seditionist"!
No, REALLY?? The deuce you say!!
"IS THIS JOURNALISM OR SLEAZE?"
Well, if you're talking the Pest and eFail, the answer is "sleaze". Next?
"Bowman’s article today refers to the editor of The Post & Email as a “hobby seditionist.” Bowman is reportedly “an award-winning journalist” and author of a book entitled Savage Lies: The Half-Truths, Distortions and Outright Lies of a Right Wing Blowhard which allegedly “fact checks the first three political books by radio commentator Michael Savage.”
So in other words, someone who's used to examining the lies of far-right wackaloons.
"As Mr. Bowman has never contacted The Post & Email via email, our office telephone number, nor by standard mail, he knows nothing about this writer or whether or not I write for The Post & Email as a “hobby.” In fact, his statement is completely inaccurate, because as editor I am paid for my work, rendering his term “hobby” completely false."
Oh, so you're a professional seditionist then. That's good to know.
"The Post & Email also supports in their entirety the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, and the U.S. Constitution."
Except for the parts you don't like, want to rewrite, or otherwise ignore or undermine.
"The First Amendment in the Bill of Rights deals with freedom of speech, of the press"
Including one Bill Bowman.
"In a previous article, Bowman stated, “Sharon Rondeau is a professional harpist and full-time America hater. As editor of the Web-based Post & Email, she has plenty of opportunity to display her anti-Americanism through her own writing and by publishing screeds written by other America haters.”
Which she does on a regular basis.
"The Post & Email has never exposed any individual’s personal information, whether or not he or she agrees with our viewpoint, to the public. We have never revealed IP addresses, occupations, first or last names, or places of residence, although we have this information on many of our political opponents. We do not pick fights with nor slander writers with opposing viewpoints. "
O RLY??? I guess this attack on Politijab and Fogbow was just an accident then?? Or John Charlton's "Brownshirt" post where they published the IP addresses, names, and locations of people they disagreed with. (Not to mention this article here as well.)
"If Mr. Bowman is an award-winning author, why is he spending his time denigrating LCDR Walter Fitzpatrick, Dr. Orly Taitz, Ron Ewart, Dr. Lyle Rapacki, this writer, or anyone else, for that matter?"
Because you're a bunch of anti-American conspiracy cranks fomenting sedition??
And Rondeau then writes a letter:
"Your writer Bill Bowman has named me as a “hobby seditionist,” and as the owner of a corporation, I plan on using the full force of law to refute his defamatory remarks in his column today here:"
So who's going to be your lawyer?? Berg? Dr. Orly? Oh, I know, Apuzzo!!
I am demanding a retraction of the term “hobby seditioninst.”
Okay, you're a professional seditionist then.
"I believe in enforcing the provisions of the U.S. Constitution, which hardly makes me a seditionist."
No, you're calling for the overthrow of a democratically-elected President based on a pack of long-debunked lies, giving an open mike to people like Neil Turner and Ron Ewart calling for a governmental overthrow, and allow comments though moderation that call for worse than that.
You're a seditionist alright.
"If I do not receive a retraction from you or Mr. Bowman within the next 72 hours, I plan on consulting our corporate attorney about legal action against your publication."
Oooh! You do that. I can just see the list of things that Bill Bowman would ask for in discovery like:
The name and address of "John Charlton" or if the person really exists.
A sworn statement from said person.
A list of the Pest and eFail's financial records including donations.
The involvement and connections between Pest and eFail writers and "reporters" with militia, neo-Confederate, racist, sovereign citizen, and dominionist groups.
"Publishing personal information about anyone defies proper journalistic standards. "
When why have you done it in the past Rondeau? Oh, right, you wouldn't know journalistic standards if they bit you on the rear.
"Opinions are not facts. Mr. Bowman is entitled to his opinion on any matter, but if he insists on labeling people “seditionist,” “crazy,” and “traitor” when they are not, then we will take action. "
Problem is that your little "eNewspaper" is FULL of sedition, crazy conspiracy, and outright treason. It's hard to claim you're not when just about every single thing you've posted show otherwise.
It does show how incredibly thin-skinned the birthers are about anyone who dares disagree with them. Rondeau has no problems spreading lies, bigotry, hatred, and sedition, but throws a tantrum and threatens legal action when called on her behaviour.
14 February - And the Senate version of Arizona's "birther bill 2.0", (which did the de Vattelist thing), seems to be DOA.
"It doesn't look like Barack Obama will need to get his original birth certificate to state officials to be on the presidential ballot in Arizona next year.
On a 5-3 vote Monday, the Senate Judiciary Committee defeated SB 1526 which would let Arizona impose its own requirements on what someone needs to prove before being on the ballot in the state. Three Republicans voted with the two Democrats on the panel to kill the plan offered by Sen. Ron Gould, R-Lake Havasu City.
Virtually identical legislation was introduced in the House in the form of HB 2544. But that measure has never gotten a hearing."
The comments have the usual crop of idiots (Sam Sewell, "Borderraven", etc.)
15 February - I suspect Bill Bowman is less than impressed with Sharon Rondeau's little tirade.
"In a previous post, I labelled The Post & Email editor Sharon Rondeau "a full--time harpist and a hobby seditionist." Well, I have been provided with more accurate information by Ms. Rondeau herself, via a post in the P&E:
As Mr. Bowman has never contacted The Post & Email via email, our office telephone number, nor by standard mail, he knows nothing about this writer or whether or not I write for The Post & Email as a “hobby.” In fact, his statement is completely inaccurate, because as editor I am paid for my work, rendering his term “hobby” completely false.
I stand corrected. Since she is paid for her work, it is now my opinion that Ms. Rondeau is a professional seditionist. I apoligize for minimizing her role in the effort to overthrow a democratically elected president."
*Snork*
"...in the P&E's case, in my opinion, is presenting one-sided information, ignoring the facts and calling for the arrest of a democratically elected president.
Which, of course, they are perfectly within their rights to do. And I, and others, are perfectly within our rights to call them on it and give our opinions based on certain facts."
Since the Pest and eFail has very little to do with anything factual, it's no wonder Rondeau is confused about such things.
"Let's see, IDing a Fogbower's employment, giving his first name, suggesting that P&Eers interfere with his business, and calling him a communist and scum. Are those your standards, Ms. Rondeau? Is that how you honor the Declration of Independence, the Bill of Rights and the U.S. Constitution?"
Pretty much so, yeah.
"Continuously publishing statements that question the qualifications and character of the president can have as its effect a mobilizing of those who would use violence to remove him from office. Rondeau plays to her audience of virulent Obama haters with this tactic; in my opinion, knowing full well what the consequences of her actions could be. And posting comments -- since they are moderated, a de facto agreement with them -- that call for his violent ouster serves only to inflame passions.
Charge that the sitting president has "shredded the Constitution," claim that treason has been committed, allege that he has a bias against the religion to which he professes faith. Otherwise known as "stirring the pot." Otherwise known as sedition, in my opinion."
Not just your opinion either.
"Rondeau ends her piece with a threat to sue me and the Examiner. Speaking soley for myself, i say: bring it."
*Applause*
15 February -And Public Policy Polling shows why the GOP continues to play flirty games with the birtherstani.
(PDF of results here)
"Birthers make a majority among those voters who say they're likely to participate in a Republican primary next year. 51% say they don't think Barack Obama was born in the United States to just 28% who firmly believe that he was and 21% who are unsure. The GOP birther majority is a new development. The last time PPP tested this question nationally, in August of 2009, only 44% of Republicans said they thought Obama was born outside the country while 36% said that he definitely was born in the United States. If anything birtherism is on the rise."
And also shows that the GOP has been largely successful in driving moderates and sanity out of their party.
This trend may prove to be interesting depending on who actually comes out to vote in the primaries.
"How does this impact Romney? Well among the 49% of GOP primary voters who either think Obama was born in the United States or aren't sure, Romney's the first choice to be the 2012 nominee by a good amount, getting 23% to 16% for Mike Huckabee, 11% for Sarah Palin, and 10% for Newt Gingrich. But with the birther majority he's in a distant fourth place at 11%, with Mike Huckabee at 24%, Sarah Palin at 19%, and Newt Gingrich at 14% all ahead of him. That pushes him into a second place finish overall at 17% with Mike Huckabee again leading the way this month at 20%. Palin's third with 15%, followed by Gingrich at 12%, Ron Paul at 8%, Mitch Daniels and Tim Pawlenty at 4%, and John Thune at 1%."
It's interesting to note that Palin didn't do well with either group too.
"There is really a remarkable divide in how the birther and non-birther wings of the GOP view Sarah Palin. With the birthers she is a beloved figure, scoring an 83/12 favorability rating. Non-birthers are almost evenly divided on her with 47% rating her positively and 40% unfavorably."
I suspect you could call them the "Sane" and the "Batshit Crazy" wings of the GOP.
15 February - Doesn't look like Dr. Orly or anyone else is feeenished with the CEL3 v Family Taitz spat.
"02/15/2011 42 NOTICE OF MOTION AND First MOTION for Sanctions Plaintiff filed by defendants Appealing Dentistry, Orly Taitz Inc. Motion set for hearing on 3/21/2011 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andrew J. Guilford. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit e-mail and statement from lincoln received in the middle of the night, # 2 Exhibit motion by multiple judges in TX to sanction Lincoln, # 3 Exhibit order by Chief Judge Walter Smith to sanction Lincoln)(Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 02/15/2011)"
The first attachment is the "Plaintiff's Report on Joint Scheduling Conference held by telephone on Thursday, February 2, 2011"
(Scribd link here)
What's amusing is the first page of the document, which is actually an email from CEL3 to the attorneys involved sent at 12:26am the morning of the trial. Dr. Orly then cc'ed it to Pamela Barnett and "Ken and Betsey Allan", saying:
"Orly Taitz (redacted)
Mon. Feb 14 2011 at 1:16 AM
To: Pamela Barnett (redacted), Ken and Betsey Allan (redacted)
this was sent to me now by Creepy Kreep, Berg an Lincoln
Just a bunch of creeps"
She really is stuck at the mental age of 12, isn't she??
It's also amusing to note that not only did she forward this to Pam Barnett BEFORE she did her husband, but her husband's email address is the only one she redacted.
Wow.
The other two documents are a motion for sanctions against Lincoln from a 2008 Texas case (scribd link here) and the order granting such sanctions (scribd link here). I will note these cases were before CEL3 and Dr. Orly hooked up, so she SHOULD have already known about them when she was using him as a law clerk and boytoy.
15 February - Remember Pam Barnett's attempt to get her old judge back in Barnett v Dunn because the new judge had Obama cooties or something like that?
"02/15/2011 31 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/14/2011 denying 30 Motion for reconsideration of order to replace District Judge Damrell. (Lundstrom, T) (Entered: 02/15/2011)"
(Scribd link here)
"On January 21, 2011, the undersigned, acting in his capacity as Chief District Judge of the Eastern District of California, reassigned this action from District Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. to District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller for all further proceedings.
On February 3, 2011, Plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the order to replace District Judge Damrell.
When filing a motion for reconsideration, Local Rule 230(j) requires a party to show the new or different facts or circumstances claimed to exist which did not exist or were not shown upon such prior motion, or what other grounds exist for the motion.
Appendix A to the Local Rules, subsection (f)(4), allows the Chief District Judge of the Eastern District to make reassignments “as are conducive to the equitable division and just, efficient and economical determination of the business of the Court.” The recent appointment of a new District Judge to the Eastern District of California provides grounds for reassignment. Plaintiff’s request for reconsideration provides no legal grounds to reconsider the propriety of the reassignment.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s request for reconsideration of the order to replace District Judge Damrell is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED"
Cue Barnett screaming "CONSPIRACY" in 3....2.....1......
I've really been enjoying Bill Bowman's posts and the recaps of them here.
Posted by: G | February 15, 2011 at 09:12 PM
What "G" said. Bowman sure gets under the birthers' skin. I suspect that is because (a) he is a terrific writer and (b) they have heretofore thought of the Examiner as "theirs". If Rondeau is stupid enough to sue him, Bowman may just wind up owning the Pest and Efail!
Posted by: Lawyerwitharealdegree | February 16, 2011 at 01:22 AM
I love when Birfoons swear they are going to sue someone for "Stuff". They always forget that the boring things that go along with it, like facts and.....wait for it.....wait for it....DISCOVERY.
Yep, Shazza, if you try and sue someone for calling you a seditionist, they be the defendant, you haz to prove stuff AND they get to legally trawl through all the nice info about you and yours that is material.
Just who IS John Charlton, just what pay do you get and where does it come from, provide ALL the data from your web site, backups, correspondance etc that can be used to show you and your little band of filth are seditious .
Go on Shazza, Bill has dared you, gonna step up to the plate..?
Posted by: bovril | February 16, 2011 at 06:31 AM