Listen to internet radio with R C on Blog Talk Radio
If you're    ready for a zombie apocalypse, then you're ready for any emergency.    emergency.cdc.gov
Blog powered by Typepad

Become a Fan

« Dispatches from Birtherstan - 30 April - 2 May 2011 | Main | Dispatches from Birtherstan - 4 May 2011 »

May 03, 2011

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e553b3b3a78833014e883925f7970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Dispatches from Birtherstan - 3 May 2011:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

DaveH

Birthers claim they're not racists by pointing to Alan Keyes. Something tells me if his name was Mohamed Abu Shakara that they wouldn't want him in their corner. No. They definitely aren't racists.

Too bad they haven't aired the coverage of the hearing, yet. It will be most amusing to watch.

Greg Brown

Patrick, I don't know how you do it. I can barely force myself to read these vile, putrid excerpts, but God bless you, for bring the crazy home for us and the FBI, Secret Service, et al.

G

*sigh* Yeah, with the main thrust of Birtherism having been blown out of the water and shot to hell over this past week, the birther cockroaches are scrambling in their rage to find any bit of bullshit to glom onto next.

You are absolutely correct that the racism is becoming more overt again - it seems to slip out whenever their rage at a big loss causes them to temporarily let down their guard...

On a more ominous note... the comment from "Ronnie" that you shared from Walt's seditious site is likely to become the "meme" that these desparate haters move more and more towards as the year progresses - calling Obama the "Anti-Christ".

Not only is it a last ditch card of crap to pull out when all else blows up in their face...but it is a purely fundamentalist "faith based" charge that they don't have to even try to provide evidence for... combine that with all the crazy End Times beliefs that are likely held by many in this crazy crowd and you've got a devious and dangerous firebrand charge that they'll eventually exploit.

Phil

They really are a sad bunch of losers. The whole country, he'll the whole western world, is busy celebrating the death of Bin Laden and these sad losers are so bound up in their hatred of a black man being president that they can't even take a couple of days out from their stupidity to be happy with their fellow citizens.
They're pathetic.

The Magic M

> Like, oh, when it was first typed in 1961??

Actually, Miss Tickly is obviously so desperate to find as many "flaws" as possible in the LFBC that she even claims the fact there's a space between "4" and "," in the birth date points to a "forgery".

Funny she doesn't muse about the different alignments in the Nordyke twins' BC's. Oh, or the "Honolulu, Oahu" vs. "Honolulu, Hawaii" discrepancy in the Nordyke BC's.
It's kinda hard for a birther to discredit those documents he has been touting as "the real thing" for months.

aarrgghh

"On a more ominous note... the comment from "Ronnie" that you shared from Walt's seditious site is likely to become the "meme" that these desparate haters move more and more towards as the year progresses - calling Obama the "Anti-Christ"."

no, henceforth the chant will be "vattel, vattel, it was always vattel!"

Bob Stanley

Taitz told the 9th circuit judges that she sent letters challenging Obama's eligibility to Congress "before and after" the Keyes/Obama election. Was she lying about the "before" part?

ImRubberYoureGlue

"Miss Ticky literally listens to the voices in her head about the long form."

Literally? Yeah, this isn't a total distortion. I guess you couldn't dispute the content so second-grade spin will have to do.

'Bad fiction' sums it up nicely.

ImRubberYoureGlue

"Actually, Miss Tickly is obviously so desperate to find as many "flaws" as possible in the LFBC that she even claims the fact there's a space between "4" and "," in the birth date points to a "forgery"."

Did you read the blog post?

Actually, she wrote that the space appeared to indicate someone removed the form from a typewriter then reinserted it. Nothing more.

It piqued her curiosity why someone would eject the form between the date and comma preceding the year.

Seems to me it is the duplicated sets of pixels that indicated forgery.

But whatever helps you cope...just lie to yourself.

Patrick McKinnion

"ImRubberYoureGlue" - Cute name. I guess you missed where she said, quote:

"But none-the-less, I had all but resigned myself to this logical conclusion….until the Odds started whispering their racist hate-speech in my ear."

So yes, she changed her mind after something started whispering in her ear - BY HER OWN ADMISSION.

As for "forgery", since there is not only a clear evidence chain from the State of Hawaii to the White House, but the State of Hawaii has posted the letters from said evidence chain, publicly stated that the document is authentic, and linked to it on the official State website. So either a) the State of Hawaii is lying and in on the coverup, or b) this is a copy of the original document.

Oh, and BTW, I will point out a difference between this blog and the birther blogs.

I leave posts like yours up rather than delete them. Funny thing that.

MaryRC

I find it fascinating to watch Dr. Kate try to reconcile two opposing wingnut theories: (1) that it was Leon Panetta, not the President, who ordered the strike against Osama; and (2) that Osama has really been dead and on ice for years.

You can tell that she wants to believe them both. At one point she is feebly asking if someone other than Osama could have been in the compound.

But at least she's trying. Her gang has no problem believing two contradictory stories at once. The President totally staged the fake photo of White House and military personnel watching the firefight! AND they had to drag him in off the golf course to watch it!

The Magic M

> Actually, she wrote that the space appeared to indicate someone removed the form from a typewriter then reinserted it. Nothing more.

No, she called it "an anomaly". That of course is assuming it never happens that someone types a space too many and then the comma.

And the comma is too perfect to be the result of re-inserting the paper a second time.

So that's more of a little white lie why she was moved to "look for signs of forgery", just because she won't admit she considered the document a forgery from the get-go.

Why doesn't she complain the Nordyke twins' BC's are full of "anomalies", including one stating "Honolulu, Hawaii" and the other "Honolulu, Oahu"?

The comments to this entry are closed.

Bad Tips

Help my blog?

Tip Jar

Crazy Internet People

Barackryphal

Obama Conspiracy Theories

Oh, For Goodness Sake

Reality Check | Blog Talk Radio Feed

Reality Check Radio Blog

Rumproast

Thunderhaven

Turning the Scale