In today's dispatches, more whiney letters at the Pest and eFail, a previously undiscovered "BJ Smartazz" video, and Larry Sellin is banging the drums again.
But the biggest news is Judge Lamberth basically telling Dr. Orly "Yo, idiot, knock this crap off and follow the rules, okay??". Dr. Orly being what she is, I suspect her ability to follow these rules without mouthing off or accusing / blaming someone else is pretty much nil. And even her fellow birthers are questioning her as a result.
25 July - Failed scientologist and writer Sher Zieve pens another Xenu-knows what diatribe in the Pest and eFail.
"To anyone with a functional mind. it is inarguable that Obama has established a dictatorship–replacing the USA’s former Republic–with his own brand of totalitarian dictates "
If your definition of "functional mind" means "eating lead paint-chip crackers while being hit repeatedly in the head with a baseball bat", then yes it would be inarguable.
25 July - Chief Judge Royce Lamberth responds to Dr. Orly's latest amended filing. And he's not very happy.
"07/25/2011 30 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 27[RECAP] Motion for Reconsideration and Striking 28 Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 7/25/11. (rje) (Entered: 07/25/2011)"
(Scribd link here)
"Defendant's motion to strike [24] plaintiffs opposition to defendant's summary judgment motion, and attached exhibits, was promptly granted [25] due to plaintiffs failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(a)(I), which requires that only the last four digits of a social security number are to be filed with the Court.
The Court will not tolerate plaintiffs repeated violations of this Rule."
And that's the first paragraph.
"On July 15,2011, plaintiff-again in direct violation of Rule 5.2-filed her opposition to defendant's summary judgment motion, in which she failed to delete all but the last four digits of the social security numbers contained therein. The Court's Order [25] striking plaintiffs opposition did not impose sanctions against plaintiff because defendant had not sought them."
I wonder if that's the Judge hinting "please please please ask for them next time, okay?"
"Plaintiff should be aware, however, that repeated violations of the Rules are in fact sanctionable, even sua sponte. Moreover, wasting the Court's time with nonsense is not the way for plaintiff to have any hope of prevailing in this case."
Not that she had a hope of prevailing mind you.
"In the explanation attached to her motion for reconsideration, plaintiff states the following:
I printed out a new copy, redacted the last four digits of the SSN in question and paid for fed ex again and shipped the redacted copy with the explanation to the clerk of the court.
Plaintiff s statement is an admission that even her redacted version was submitted in violation of Rule 5.2. Plaintiff admits that she did the opposite of what the Rule requires-she deleted the last four digits of the social security numbers contained in her proposed redacted opposition. The Rule requires that she delete all but the last four digits of a social security number."
Since when has Dr. Orly followed the rules??
"On this day, the Court received by mail another version of plaintiffs opposition. It will not be filed. Yet again, all of the document's redactions are improper.
Plaintiff is either toying with the Court or displaying her own stupidity. She made the correct redactions when she re-filed her Complaint and Amended Complaint. There is no logical explanation she can provide as to why she is now wasting the Court's time, as well as staffs time, with these improper redactions."
Well, there's c) she's batshit insane, but otherwise.....oh dear.
"07/25/2011 29 ORDER to seal Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 7/25/11. (rje) (Entered: 07/25/2011)"
(Scribd link here)
"ORDER
Attached hereto for filing under seal are two versions of a document submitted to the Court by plaintiff-one via email to the Courtroom Deputy Clerk, and one via FedEx to chambers-entitled Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment.
The documents will not be docketed or placed on the public record because they contain information submitted in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(a)(l). See separate Memorandum & Order, issued this date.
The documents will be kept for consideration of possible sanctions against plaintiff.
SO ORDERED this 25th day of July 2011.
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH
Chief Judge
United States District Court"
"Yosi?? Please to be getting checkbook out soon. Your darling Orly may be making oopsies again."
25 July - BirtherReport.com reports on Judge Lamberth's ruling. And the comments from the birthers aren't very complementary.....
.....for Dr. Orly.
"Anonymous said...
The only person sabotaging her case is Orly. Is this some type of martyr complex?
July 25, 2011 6:34 PM"
"Arizona Patriot said...
Orly has done this all along. Even when I was helping her collect evidence, I wondered who side she was on.
She won't listen to anyone. 100 times I have told her she is filing these things in the wrong court.
It's as plain as day who has jurisdiction over Obama. She will never get a federal court to rule on Obama.
Congress established the Superior Court of the District of Columbia as the trial court of general jurisdiction for the District of Columbia in 1970. The court consists of a chief judge and 61 associate judges. The court is assisted by the service of 24 magistrate judges as well as retired judges who have been recommended and approved as senior judges.
http://www.dccourts.gov/dccourts/superior/index.jsp
July 25, 2011 7:06 PM"
"Anonymous said...
Barry's lawyers have been laughing at us for 3 years, due to this inability to follow simple rules.
July 25, 2011 7:16 PM"
"Anonymous said...
Well crap, here we go again. Incompetance. I tried to tell her on her own blog that details matter in Court cases and she wouldn't even post my comments. I also told her to purchase a typewriter (they do still sell them) if she couldn't scan the documents, fill them in and print them. Badly handwritten crap looks like crap in a Court of law and especially one this important! Anyway, she has to know how to redact something if she refiled it correctly the first time. Damn!
July 25, 2011 8:15 PM"
"Anonymous said...
Orly is every bit as big an obot as Trump. She has to be doing this on purpose. It is impossible for licensed lawyer to be that stupid.
Someone needs to investigate. She has been taking our money for years and is a secret obot.
July 25, 2011 8:26 PM"
"Anonymous said...
To me, it seems that Taitz does nor know what she is doing.
Federal rules have to be followed when you want to win a case in federal court. It's that simple.
But Taitz doesn't seem to understand that, to the detriment of the movement.
July 25, 2011 8:47 PM"
"MissTickly said...
Incompetence or Agent Provocateur?
Both are equally inexcusable, IMO.
Personally, I don't think Orly is incompetent, I think she is very good at what she gets paid to do.
All these *ahem* lawyers that have failed to argue the successful disclosure of a record that has already been allegedly made public, TWICE...are very, very good at what they get paid to do.
July 25, 2011 9:22 PM"
"C.A. Holly said...
Oh my, this is not good. Would that I could defend such ineptitude, but I cannot.
Well, there's still a chance the Supremes will decide they have been derelict long enough, and decide to take up the issue during their upcoming September conference.
July 25, 2011 11:02 PM"
"Anonymous said...
I donated to Orly about a month an a half ago. In light of this latest inept debacle however, I will now apply the old adage "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me." I'm done with Orly, barring some stunning legal development that indicates major headway in the SS# case. I smell grifter. Nobody could be this consistently inept unless it was/is deliberate.
Pro Graphics, where art thou?
F/J
July 26, 2011 1:15 AM"
"Anonymous said...
TAITZ IS AN OBOT YOU FOOLS
July 26, 2011 3:10 AM"
And these are her fellow birthers. Uneasy is the crown of on the head of the queen....
But there's always hope that a revolt or coup will solve the problem for Dr. Orly.
"Anonymous said...
Army Colonel Lawrence Sellin, LTC Lakin, Maj Gen Vallely, Dr Amb Alan Keyes et al, are correct:
Not only is the truth coming out soon, but there will be enough Repubs along with the Dems brought up on charges of abetting fraud.
It will happen before Orly finally has success, which she will and would...but under the radar, there is more understanding in DC of what is really happening than Carter has liver pills.
Col Sellin is on the mark: Worst Constitutional Crisis since the Civil War and 100 times worse than Watergate.
July 25, 2011 10:52 PM"
26 July - More whiney letters in the Pest and eFail.
"Congress and the High Court owe an answer to this Nation. "
They do??
"They have to address the issue of Obama’s ILLEGITIMACY for Presidency due to:
*his British Citizenship at birth,
*his Kenyan citizenship from age 2, and
*his Indonesian citizenship from around age 5 until now."
They've answered all of that. The answer for the first two was that he was born in Hawaii and is therefore a Natural-Born US Citizen, and the third was that a minor US citizen cannot under US law renounce US citizenship.
Next?
"And they have to respond in regards to all the illegal activity surrounding him and his supporters."
What illegal activity??
"Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro is not a Natural Born Citizen: To be a President and Commander in Chief one has to be a Natural Born citizen, born to two U.S. citizen parents."
Not according to US law or the US Constitution.
"A child born of a U.S. mother and foreign father cannot be Natural Born. Not ever. . Not even a little bit."
Not according to US law or the US Constitution.
"Despite news reports to the contrary, no Hawaiian official has ever stated that Obama was born in Honolulu in 1961. "
Funny, the website for the State of Hawaii department of health disagrees with you.
"It is possible that Obama may not even be a U.S. citizen!"
Not according to US law or the US Constitution.
26 July - The DC blog "Legal Times" comments on Judge Lamberth's warning to Dr. Orly.
"The government did not seek sanctions against Taitz, but Lamberth noted that “repeated violations of the Rules are in fact sanctionable… Moreover, wasting the Court’s time with nonsense is not the way for plaintiff to have any hope of prevailing in this case.”
The documents in question were filed in opposition to a pending motion by the Social Security Administration for summary judgment. A spokesman for the Justice Department, which is litigating the case, declined to comment. A Social Security Administration representative could not immediately be reached."
Mind you, Dr. Orly hasn't stopped any....
"Taitz, in an e-mail this morning, said she planned to refile her opposition to the summary judgment motion today. She accused court staff of lying to Lamberth about her communications with the court about her previous filings and reiterated her theory about Obama’s “illegitimate usurpation of the White House.”"
26 July - And Dr. Orly posts the email she sent to "Legal Times". (malware and redirect warning)
(Note - SSN redactions mine. Dr. Orly can't seem to get a clue.)
"HERE IS MY RESPONSE TO ZOE TILLMAN, DC COURTS REPORTER FROM “LEGAL TIMES”.
Posted on | July 26, 2011 | 1 Comment
”Legal Times” wanted to report on one litle setback, an order by Judge Lamberth to temporarily seal one of my pleadings. They have not reported yet anything about Obama’s use in his selective service certificate of the CT SSN (redacted) and the letter from the Social Security, stating, that this number was never assigned to him."
I wouldn't call a warning of sanctions a "little setback". And the story isn't about your insane conspiracy claims, it's about the Judge telling to you knock your shit off and fly right.
"Ironically this one temporary sealing from the public of one document, which they want to report on, but which is only a temporary order with no connection to the expected final order on the merits, can actually be a silver ligning, a blessing in disguise as it brakes the controversy 0pen."
Sure it is.....you just keep sucking that nitrous down now.
"From: Orly Taitz [mailto:(redacted)
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 10:26 AM
To: Zoe Tillman
Subject: Re: Legal Times article on lawsuit
"Some employees of the DC court are lying to the judge. I kept record of all the phone calls, faxes and e-mails to the DC court and I have multiple witnesses as well. Some employee or employees of the DC court is/are lying and will be held accountable. On 07.21.2011 a fax was accepted in the DC court and was hand carried to the chambers of the chief judge. Sua sponte decision of the court on 07.21.2011 allowing me to resubmit the opposition was related to the fax received."
Somehow I don't think the Judge agrees with you....
"A lot is going on right now. Currently I am concentrating on doing everything I possibly can to inspect the original BC in HI and the original SSA application for Connecticut SSN (redacted), which Obama is fraudulently using."
And, in typical Dr. Orly fashion, you're screwing that up as well.
"I will provide more information later. It also will be a part of my book, that will be coming out later. The book is tentatively titled “from the queen of the birthers. Secrets and intrigue behind the crime of the century”
A book eh?? Vanity press, or is World Nut Daily going to publish it for you??
"Can you find one single expert in the country, who would state, that this garbage posted by Obama on WH.gov is not a forgery? You can’t because it is a flagrant, cheap forgery."
Well, the State of Hawaii has pronounced it authentic. I suspect they know something about their own birth certificates.
26 July - Lawrence Sellin continues to beat the drums
"It isn’t a speed bump; it’s a train wreck. We are already on a slippery slope toward lawlessness, chaos and fragmentation."
Assisted by people like Lawrence Sellin and his complete disregard for the facts.
"We have run out of time and action must be taken to save our country."
O RLY??
"Because Obama has not proven himself eligible for the office of the Presidency, the 20th Amendment to the Constitution must be immediately invoked:
Section 3. If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.
Due to the open question regarding Obama’s eligibility for office, all laws signed, all executive orders given and all appointments made by him must be held in abeyance."
And, again, the thought that removing Obama somehow magically resets everything to 2008 again.
"Congress must order an immediate investigation of the allegations that Obama officially presented a forged Certificate of Live Birth, is illegally using a Social Security Number and has forged his Selective Service registration.
If federal officials refuse to act, then it is incumbent on ordinary Americans to execute lawful citizen’s arrests for “Misprision of felony” under United States federal law 18 U.S.C. § 4:"
And see just how real law enforcement sees your "citizens arrest" of Members of Congress and the Senate. I'm sure they'll spend a long time talking it over with you quite throughly. They may even read you something from someone named "Miranda"!
26 July - Dr. Orly reposts a comment she made at "Legal Times" that was since removed by that blog (Malware and redirect warning)
(redaction mine)
"Ms. Tillman misrepresents the information and facts.
Please, visit my site OrlyTaitzESQ.com and download the actual documents and pleadings.Please find the selective service certificate for Obama, which shows him using Connecticut Social Security number (redacted)."
Make sure you update your virus and malware software first.
"You can also find social security administration letter, showing Obama never being assigned this number. For this people go to prison. This is the biggest crime in the history of this nation. Legal times chose not to report the truth and defraud the nation"
Yes, attack the blog you're wanting to report your side of things. That will work SO well for you.
26 July - I found another Christa Chantal Allen video, this one done under the YouTube name "ExposeTheFraudster", and dated 1 September 2010.
Wow.
26 July - The Orange County Register comments on Judge Lamberth's order towards Dr. Orly.
"Laguna Niguel attorney Orly Taitz has again been scolded by a federal judge, this time in a case related to her claims that President Barack Obama has used other people’s Social Security numbers.
“Plaintiff is either toying with the Court or displaying her own stupidity,” District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth wrote in a Monday ruling on a technical issue in a case in which Taitz is trying to acquire confidential information from the Social Security Administration.
Taitz – best known for failed lawsuits alleging Obama is not a natural-born citizen – has been told by Lamberth to redact the Social Security numbers she’s citing in her motions, leaving only the last four digits visible. Lamberth said she’s failed to do so – although in one case, she redacted the last four digits but left the rest – the opposite of Lamberth’s instructions."
26 July - The Washington Post also comments on the judge's order against Dr. Orly.
"Local court rules state that people must redact all but the last four digits of social security numbers included in court filings. Instead, Taitz kept redacting the last four digits.
“There is no logical explanation she can provide as to why she is now wasting the Court’s time, as well as staff’s time, with these improper redactions,”he wrote.
He also noted that Taitz called a courtroom deputy and engaged in a “lengthy, accusatory conversation” and has made “the somewhat hysterical claim in her motion for reconsideration that there may be an ‘employee in this court, who is intentionally sabotaging’” her case.
On her blog, Taitz responded to an e-mail from a Legal Times reporter on Monday seeking a comment about the critical order: “Some employees of the DC Court are lying to the judge. I kept record of all the phone calls, faxes and e-mails to the DC court and I have multiple witnesses as well. Some employee or employees of the DC court is/are lying and will be held accountable.”"
26 July - She really is that freaking stupid. (malware and redirect warning).
"Attn clerk of the court,
Dear sir/mdm
Per 07.21.2011 order by Judge Lamberth, (see attached) plaintiff is resubmitting attached Opposition and memorandum in opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment by the Defendant. Plaintiff redacted the first five digits in the number xxx-xx-4425 instead of redacting the last four digits per order, even though according to the exhibit 2 of the motion, this number was not assigned by the Social Security administration and does not represent a valid SSA number at all. Please, docket this attached Motion as soon as possible, since Judge Lamberth allowed only 14 days."
Is it my imagination, or does this have "please sanction my happy ass" written all over it??
Yes, Sanctions Baby, then the California Bar...
Posted by: Jorge | July 26, 2011 at 04:43 PM
(This is a rhetorical question)
Why are the birthers so juvenile? Seriously, they all remind me of young adolescents playing grownup's games.
Posted by: Kate520 | July 26, 2011 at 04:45 PM
Is it my imagination, or does this have "please sanction my happy ass" written all over it??
MMMMMM, Could Be....
I can image that Mr. Taitz should be considering some legal options at this time. It's his money, now it it up to him to keep it.
Posted by: ratbert | July 26, 2011 at 04:47 PM
I swallowed my tongue watching that video.....good thing I type 80 wpm. oofa.
Posted by: goodgravy | July 26, 2011 at 04:49 PM
Yes she is that stupid.
Posted by: milspec | July 26, 2011 at 04:53 PM
Orly just doesn't get it at all. It's the court rules that dictate that social security numbers only show the last 4 numbers. It doesn't matter if the number is legitimate or not.
She needs to be sanctioned big time. Not some light sanction, either. It'll have to be a lot greater than 20 grand.
She is going to continue to abuse the courts for her political agenda. They need to put a stop to it by requiring her to ask permission to file a lawsuit from now on.
Posted by: DaveH | July 26, 2011 at 05:18 PM
Ummm. If the number is not a legitimate SS#, how could it be assigned to somebody born in 1890?
Posted by: Monkey Boy | July 26, 2011 at 05:33 PM
Shame on you, Monkey Boy. You obviously possess rudimentary critical thinking skills which means YOU MUST BE AN OBOT!
Posted by: Shay | July 26, 2011 at 08:47 PM
Way past time for the courts to stop treating Orly with kids gloves...heavy sanctions would just be the tip of the iceberg of what is long overdue to her for her gross incompetence and entirely insane actions of frivolous filings and outrageous statements. Bring back the mental wards and straightjacket that nut, stat!
Posted by: G | July 27, 2011 at 01:06 PM