In today's dispatches, a recent poll of the remaining Republicans shows the birther index is much higher. Meanwhile the birthers score another loss in Virginia. The birtherstani also petition Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp to please please PLEASE don't let that scary black man on the ballot!!
Too bad Kemp has another answer for the birthers.
Because of Kemp's reply and the news that Joe Arpaio will release his "Cold Case Report" on 1 March, the birthers are acting like feeding time for the piranha tank, with "hang them all, let God sort them out" narrowly edging out "to hell with the Constitution, there's a black man in the WHITE House" for sheer rabidity.
The Pest and eFail comes back on line and promptly prints whiney letters. Not to mention open and blatant calls for insurrection, and another of Padawan Pauly's "Sacred Sperm of Citizenship" screeds. And finally, Dr. Orly is nearly incoherent with rage about being told "no", and is threatening Brian Kemp, Judge Melihi, and anyone else who dares get in the way of the Nitrous Queen's fury.
3 February - Despite the string of failures, birtherism remains alive and well in the GOP, according to a new poll at YouGov.
"To assess the lasting power of the release of Obama’s birth certificate, a January 27-31, 2012 YouGov poll asked 500 respondents whether “Barack Obama was born in the United States of America.” I present the results below, next to the results from last April.
These polls demonstrate that the power of Obama’s action was short lived. Two-thirds of the initial 12-point increase in the percentage of respondents who say that Obama was born in the United States has disappeared since last April.
This trend is again especially pronounced among Republicans – the percentage of respondents who accept the Birther myth is, if anything, even higher than it was before Obama released his long-form certificate.
These results might be troubling, but they are not surprising. They are consistent with my previous work on the lasting power of rumors in the face of new information. As I, and others, have shown, rumors and innuendo are powerful forces in American politics – and they are hard to undo."
Part of me is wondering if part of the difference is due to the number of people being driven away from the Republican party during that time period.
6 February - "Oh For Goodness Sakes" points out that the birthers lost another case that got lost in all the hoopla about the Georgia Birther Ballot Jihad hearing and decision.
The case was "Tisdale v Obama"
(Scribd link to order here)
"The eligibility requirements to be President of the United States are such that the individual must be a “natural born citizen” of the United States and at least thirty-five years of age. U.S. Const.art. II, 1. It is well settled that those born in the United States are considered natural born citizens. See, e.g., United States v. Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 702 (1898) (“Every person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, becomes at once a citizen of the United States.”)’ Perkis v. Elg, 99 F.2d 408, 409 (1938). Moreover, “those born ‘in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,’ … have been considered American citizens under American law in effect since the time of the founding…and thus eligible for the presidency.” Hollander v. McCain, 566 F. Supp. 2d 63, 66 (D.N.H 2008). Thus, Mr. Tisdale’s contention that President Obama, Governor Romney, and Congressman Paul are not eligible to be President due to their nationalities is without merit."
The case was dismissed with prejudice.
6 February - Swiftboat liar Jerome Corsi reports at World Nut Daily that 1 March is the date for Joe Arpaio to release his "cold case posse" report.
"Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio told WND today his office has scheduled a news conference in Phoenix for March 1 to release findings of the Cold Case Posse that has been investigating Barack Obama’s birth certificate and eligibility to be president.
Arpaio declined to release to WND any of the posse’s conclusions in advance of the press conference, although he is on record saying the findings may be “shocking” to many."
What I predict is that Arpaio will regurgitate all the birther effluvia handed him, followed by some weasel-worded "we didn't have access to the records to confirm" or "happened outside county jurisdiction" comment.
"In a separate matter, Arpaio told WND that a group of Department of Justice officials from Washington, D.C., began meeting with officials of the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office regarding the DOJ’s allegation of systematic violations of the federal civil rights of Hispanics.
If the negotiations fail, the DOJ has threatened to take Arpaio and the MCSO to federal court, setting up an epic political battle just as Arpaio prepares to issue the results of the Cold Case Posse’s investigation."
And we already see the birthers setting things up for "Sheriff Joe got threatened into silence!" meme.
Comments are about what one would expect:
Thank the Lord for Sheriff Joe and may God watch over him. We need many, many more patriots with the heart of Joe. I insist that it will take such an action as this or impeachment to get rid of this Muslim-Marxist snake; if not, he will steal the next election with the help of the "state-run" media, a resurrected ACORN, and his loyal, blind and dumb "Obaa-baa-minites." GO JOE!! - use your mojo and rid this dead Republic of the ongoing tyranny that has ravaged the nation as that of a blitzkrieg. The neo-Hitler needs to be stopped - immediately!"
Our congress has betrayed us by allowing Obama's fraud to continue, The President has committed OPEN ID Theft, the Supreme Court has met in private with Obama when there were eligibility cases about him pending-violation of court procedure:We have been sold out by the federal branches of government who have conspired to defraud the United States and the people of it. Any and ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES, FEDERAL, STATE, COUNTY OR MUNICIPAL SHOULD ARREST PRESIDENT OBAMA FOR HIS FELONIES OF IDENTIFY THEFT (FAKE BIRTH DOCUMENTS FORGED WITH PHOTO SHOP) AND MULTIPLE AND ASSUMED SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS) since Congress will not impeach him. We are the laughing stock of the world and now corrupt as a any despot country unless we rise up and demand the rule of law for all."
"kathymazelDear Heavenly Father, Please protect Sheriff Joe and give him the Armor necessary to fight off and WIN for all Americans that justice will be served. Send YOUR Holy Spirit upon all of us that are YOUR people and deliver us from the evils that are in Washington that want to destroy our Country! Bring ALL who are responsible for the hideous crimes against our Constitution to Judgest! All those that have committed Treason and are apart of the New World Order and the Secret Societies that have been responsible over the last 300 years for ALL the WARS and deliberate KILLINGS of your people. Please cause Obama and his mafia administration along with Bushes,Soros, Blair, Clintons and all who serve satan in England and in Rome to run with fear at what happens when you bring justice and freedom back to these United States of America and restore our REPUBLIC under YOU Father God….. We need YOU… Heavenly Father and we need the Holy Spririt to intervene. God Bless America, Land that I love, Stand beside her and guild her in the… show more"
"Nikita63 I am a politically active independent with conservative leanings, native born and FEISTY!We had best be prepatred for more fraudulent action to protect the faux president when Sherriff Joe's data is released. Obama and his entire administration are as anti-American Citizen a group of outright constitutional traitors as we have ever had the misfortune to have seen fraudulently elected to power to the shame and detriment of all those who love liberty as their birthright and wish to see a better life for their children. He is a cancer of the face of freedom and so are others who disdain openly, all this country has ever stood FOR; people like Pelosi, Reid and SJC Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg and that reptile, Elena Kagan. The signs are all in the open now, If we wish these things for our progeny, we'd best be prepared to fight for them. In a country of 23.6 million honorably discharged veterans, aging or not, this is not likely to be a problem. Few of us have any use for those who would deny all we fought to defend and uphold., as they are SWORN… show more"
"auminer Have Blue,You ask where have all the patriots gone…?
They're out here in the boonies stocking up on AMMO and keeping the breeches well oiled.!
There is no way these twerps are gonna get away with abusing our great U.S.A. and the rule of law by destroying our Constitution along with the futures of our kids, grandkids and their kids to come.
The stakes are just too high to do nothing. As history has shown good folks will always rise up, no matter the cost, and defend our way of life and the great USA!"
You know, it's getting to the point I'm surprised to find a birther who ISN'T calling for a military coup or armed uprising.
Congress and the Senate are as you put it, simply gutless cowards. Why? because they know if they allow the truth to be told, the blacks in this country are going to rise up en-mass and start rioting.
It's time to put political correctness aside and call a spade a spade, and if the blacks riot, do what needs to be done and clean house!"
"t_reeseLet me put it all in perspective for you.
My Great Grandfather was one year old when he was forced onto the Cherokee Trail of Tears with his mother and father. He and his father survived the ordeal. His mother didn't, dying of Pneumonia.
Why do I tell you this, because I don't see Native Americans whining in the news every day about how they were put upon, yet every day there is some article about blacks and how life has been so rough on them.Quite frankly, I'm fed up hearing about how bad life has been through the years for blacks AND Jews. There is an old saying. Life's a bi** and then you die.
We have a lying fraud in the White House and he needs to be removed. If it cause a few rioters heads to get thumped during the process, so be it!"
"…but we're not racist, honest!!"
6 February - Carl Swensson loves him some of Mark McGrew's sedition on Pravda.
"Carl Swensson says:
02/06/2012 at 12:19 pm
I can now hear the drum and fife.., can you?"
No, actually I'm hearing incoherent rage and screaming from birthers.
7 February - Mark Hatfield attempts to appeal his loss to an empty chair.
(Scribd link here)
"As you are aware , Administrative Law Judge Michael Malihi issued a "Decision" in the above- referenced matters on this past Friday , February 3, 2012 , holding Defendant Barack Obama eligible as a candidate for the presidential primary election . Because you are now charged, pursuant to O. C. G.A . § 21-2-5© , with making a final determination of Defendant Obama ' s eligibility to appear on the ballot in Georgia , I am writing to respectfully point out several significant flaws in Judge Malihi's findings and conclusions."
In other words, "Wahhh! He said no! He PROMISED us a default judgement, he PROMISED!!!!"
"Initially, I would note that although Judge Malihi ordered my clients ' cases severed , as a unit , from the cases of Plaintiffs Welden ; Farrar; Lax ; Judy ; Malaren ; and Roth , and although Judge Malihi conducted a separate hearing as to my clients ' cases as requested, he nevertheless erroneously issued a single "Decision" applicable to all of the Plaintiffs ' cases , despite the fact that the evidence ; testimony; and legal argument advanced by my clients differed from that offered by the other Plaintiffs ."
Well, they all had the same case number and were arguing pretty much the same thing. The main difference is that you and Van Irion didn't want Taitz sprayed all over the place.
How did that work out for you?
"Simply put, a review of the record in my clients ' above-captioned cases reveals no evidence of Defendant's place of birth and no evidence of Defendant ' s mother's citizenship at the time of Defendant ' s birth . My clients did not enter into evidence any copy of Defendant Obama'. purported birth certificate in these cases ."
No, but Van Irion did, and the judge had to examine all the "evidence" in this case, not break it down as "well, Van Irion submitted this, so I can't use it to review Hatfield or Taitz's claims"
"As you know , Defendant Obama and his attorney, Michael Jablonski, failed to appear for the trial of these actions and failed to submit any evidence or testimony into the record . Moreover, they failed to appear notwithstanding the fact that I timely served defense counsel with a Notice to Produce , directing his client to appear at trial and to produce certain documents and items to be used as evidence by the Plaintiffs. Defense counsel , in fact, never objected to the Notice to Produce and never moved to quash same . He simply, and purposefully, ignored it."
1) Did the judge approve your "Notice to Produce"?? What made it any different then Dr. Orly's invalid "subpoenas"???
2) I get the feeling you're upset that the uppity darkie didn't do a "yasah massa" and dance when you told him to dance.
"On January 19, 2012, Plaintiffs Swensson and Powell filed a "Motion For Determination of Placement of Burden of Proof" in which Plaintiffs sought an order of the Court , pursuant to Haynes v. Wells , 273 Ga. 106, 108 - 109 , 538 S . E . 2d 430, 433 (2000) , requiring Defendant Obama to affirmatively establish his eligibility for office. Not only did Judge Malihi not rule on Plaintiffs' motion in advance of trial, as was requested by Plaintiffs, but the judge never even addressed or resolved the motion in his final ruling ."
Yes he did. He said "no"
"I do note, however, that the judge did indicate , in an in-chambers meeting at trial with all of the attorneys for the various Plaintiffs , that Defendant Obama probably carried the burden of proof in these proceedings."
And yet, after reviewing the claims of Hatfield, Van Irion, and Taitz, the judge decided their claims didn't merit Obama providing such proof.
Ouch.
"The significance of the Court's failure to rule on the burden of proof is immediately apparent. The Defendant and his lawyer failed to attend trial and failed to offer any evidence , and such failures were intentional , as shown by defense counsel's letter of January 25 , 2012. If the Defendant did, as Plaintiffs contend , bear the burden of proof in these cases , then Defendant can in no way be said to have satisfied his burden , and Plaintiffs are entitled to judgment."
If your claims and evidence were so weak the the judge determined that President Obama didn't have to provide that proof, the failure rests upon the plaintiffs attorneys and their failure to make their case even when unopposed.
"Along similar lines, the Defendant ' s deliberate failure to appear also constituted an event of default , and Plaintiffs ' challenges to Defendant ' s qualifications should have been sustained on that separate and independent basis . OSAH Rule 616- 1- 2-. 30 . However, the Court, in a fourth significant flaw in its ruling , erroneously failed to so find."
The judge offered the birthers such, but the birthers wanted this case to be heard "on the merits". Which means the judge could make the determination based upon the arguments and evidence provided.
And the birthers "merits" were so weak that even when they were unchallenged, they weren't good enough to secure a judgement in their favor.
"Incredibly, Judge Malihi did not even acknowledge the existence of the Plaintiffs' Citation For Contempt in his final ruling ."
Why should he? He took Jablonski to task for not showing, but since he was ruling against Hatfield, Van Irion, and Taitz, there was no need for him to do anything further.
"Inexplicably, Judge Malihi , after verbally acknowledging Plaintiffs ' entitlement to a "default judgment," then entered an order fully favorable to the recalcitrant Defendant, and to top it off, the judge refused to even acknowledge Plaintiffs ' attempts to have Defendant held accountable for his purposefully contemptuous behavior in ignoring Plaintiffs' Notice to Produce.
Doesn' t this result sound unreasonable? Doesn't this result appear on its face unfair? Doesn't this result in fact suggest that the Defendant is above the law?"
What it sounds like is that Hatfield is pissed he lost to an empty table.
7 February - The Pest and eFail maintains its proud tradition of publishing whiney and threatening letters.
"Please, please seek others opinions and rule that Obama can NOT be a “NATURAL BORN AMERICAN [ CITIZEN] because he was born a Brit(1) and can NEVER BE LEGIT. He should NOT be given access to Georgia ballots until the matter is resolved to America’s satisfaction."
I believe this matter was resolved to America’s satisfaction in November of 2008.
"Could it really be possible that the brilliance of our founding fathers faltered when they wrote the special qualifications for the President and Vice-President in regards to the “Natural Born Citizen” clause? Or would anyone with a modicum of sense believe they thought the foreign affiliation protection they sought would be accomplished by only one parent being a citizen?"
Show where in the Constitution it defines "Natural Born" as "born of two US citizen parents".
7 February - Birther Report comments on Hatfield's letter to SoS Brian Kemp.
"Anonymous said…[Reply] Mark Hatfield's response letter relies on fact of law; it is very well done.It will be telling to see how Mr. Kemp responds, especially with his "own peril" comment. At the very least, there is public documentation on record that shows what happened, and potential complicity in the usurpation of the Georgia and US Constitutions.
With Sheriff Arapio's upcoming "many will be shocked" announcement, the stakes are getting higher. As the man says, "the only people who are afraid of the truth, are those who have something to hide."
February 7, 2012 6:05 AM"
Oh, and no love for Dr. Orly with some of the inmates there:
"Anonymous said…[Reply] Let's just hope Orly didn't poison the well with the mad rant she already sent to the SOS.After that, he'll likely go "oh noes, not another birther complaint".
Makes you wonder if Orly rushed her "EMERGENCY YADDA-YADDA" to achieve that effect…
February 7, 2012 6:08 AM"
"Anonymous said…[Reply] @CommyKiller"The More Competent Lawyers"
Which multiple personality of Orly's are you speaking of? I haven't seen any competent lawyering coming from her. In fact she torpedoes every case she touches.
The only thing she is competent at is pissing off people and losing cases.
February 7, 2012 6:31 AM"
But she still has her supporters there:
"Dealio said…[Reply] 6:31 AM, Orly hasn't lost anything. She can't lose. She's armed with the truth. You, on the the other hand, assuming you're an American, have already lost you're country. February 7, 2012 7:31 AM"
7 February - Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp makes a decision based upon Judge Malihi's recommendation and the appeal letters from Van Irion, Hatfield, and Taitz.
(Scribd link here)
"FINAL DECISION
Petitioners filed candidate challenges pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 21-2-5(b) contending that Respondent does not meet the State of Georgia's eligibility requirements for his name to be listed on the 2012 Presidential Preference Primary ballot. Judge Michael Malihi, Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") for the Office of State Administrative Hearings, held a hearing on each candidate challenge on January 26, 2012 and entered an initial decision for the above-captioned cases on February 3,2012. The Secretary of State formally adopts the initial decision of the ALJ into this final decision.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY DECIDED THAT the above-captioned challenges are DENIED.
SO DECIDED this 7th day of February, 2012.
BRIAN P. KEMP
Georgia Secretary of State"
And he leaves a footnote to address Van Irion, Hatfield, and Taitz's claims that Malhi mixed up their cases.
"1 Judge Michael Malihi previously consolidated the above-captioned candidate challenges for the purpose of issuing his initial decision. Those candidate challenges remain consolidated for the purpose of issuing this Final Decision."
7 February - At the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Jim Galloway comments on SoS Kemp's decision.
"It feels odd to congratulate Kemp for doing the sane and obvious thing, but there you go."
7 February - The Economist does an article on the Birthers and their recent Ballot Challenge Jihads.
"The opposing case rests on a willfully idiosyncratic reading of an 1875 Supreme Court case called Minor v Happersett. In that ruling, the Court wrote, "…it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinct from aliens of foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve those doubts." In other words, Minor did not settle the question of who was and was not a natural-born citizen, as the plaintiffs claim it did, it deliberately left the question open (as does the constitution, which does not define the term). The Supreme Court has held and lower courts affirmed that natural-born citizen refers to anyone born in the United States."
Well, the birthers are good at the whole "willful ignorance" thing. Particularly when following the legal scholarship of a DUI attorney and a part-time attorney who thinks he's an avatar of God.
"Now, having read all that you might well ask who cares. Hard-core birthers ye will always have with you; they rely upon a hardy zombie of an argument and a resolute imperviousness to facts. But for four years Republicans have been dipping their toes in the fetid swamp that is birtherism, too scared to call a lie a lie. Besides, it proved useful in whipping up suspicion and hostility against Mr Obama."
Ah yes, the GOP and their flirty games with the birthers.
"The interesting question now is what happens if Mitt Romney selects Marco Rubio, born in Miami to two Cuban parents, as his running mate? What happens if Nikki Haley or Bobby Jindal, born in America to Punjabi parents, seeks the presidency in 2016? If Mr Obama is ineligible then they are too. My guess is you will see the swamp left to the swamp creatures."
Well the de Vattelists and World Nut Daily have already put the GOP on notice that they better not even think of Rubio or Jindal. It would be interesting to see if they suddenly try to explain it away or double down on the crazy.
7 February - Padawan Pauly chats it up with Carl Swensson.
"“Well, their take was that they were totally, greatly flabbergasted by what this judge said. He [the judge] didn’t deal with the facts as presented; he came up with his own facts. He did not deal with any facts in the law here. He dealt with opinion. "
Translation - "Wahhh! He actually did his legal homework and didn't blindly accept our half-assed claims as fact!!
"Carl: “Well, the next step is quite simply an appeal. All we are doing right now is formulating how that appeal will be worded. That falls into the able hands of Attorney Mark Hatfield. So Mark will be working on that and he will be working feverishly fast because we have time constraints here. Everything needs to be expedited. So that is what he is doing now. In for an ounce, in for a pound."
Oh, and please send money.
"For the love of God, anyone who hears or sees this had better start taking care of us foot soldiers, because this is it. There are not too many of us out here and we need help.”
The kind of help you need is mental rather than legal.
"Jedi Pauly: “As far as I can see, you are at the tip of the spear at this point and you have the best case going forward. If anyone should be financially supported, it is you and your attorneys and the other plaintiffs who are with you. "
Did I just hear Dr. Orly being thrown under the bus?
7 February - David Weigel chimes in.
"The Georgia case had generated some excitement on birther scam sites like World Net Daily, largely because the White House opted not to send anyone to the hearing -- aha, a chance to nail the finks on a technicality! But it wasn't enough. I'm afraid it'll be back to the Orly Taitz-ian "no one whose father had citizenship in some other country could sire a natural born American" arguments, and back to the fever swamps."
7 February - The Pest and eFail is limping along, but it does give this spin about the Georgia Birther Ballot Jihad hearing and the decisions by the court.
"It was later learned that the reason for Judge Malihi’s desire to meet with the attorneys was to inform them that, in the absence of the defendant, Barack Obama, and/or his attorney, he was prepared to issue a default judgment on their behalf. However, the attorneys refused to take yes for an answer. Instead, they insisted that, in the interest of justice, they be allowed to place all of their relevant evidence on the record, in open court. The judge acceded to their request and the trial was allowed to proceed. At approximately 9:25 AM, the attorneys filed back into the courtroom and took their places. Moments later the judge appeared and the trial was allowed to begin."
How did that work out for them??
"As witnesses were called and sworn, the plaintiffs’ attorneys laid out a carefully crafted case, providing irrefutable evidence leading to only one conclusion: that Barack Hussein Obama does not meet the “natural born Citizen” standard of Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution."
"Irrefutable" seems to have an entirely different meaning in birtherstan than in the reality-based community.
"In the end, Judge Malihi was unable to withstand whatever political correctness previous judges have found so irresistible."
Translation - "Wahh! He told us no!!"
"The very same judge who was prepared to issue a default judgment on behalf of those who challenged Obama’s eligibility has proven that he too has feet of clay. "
No, he's proven that even when unchallenged, the birthers can't win "on the merits" because there are NO merits to their claims.
"The law is clear and the evidence is irrefutable"
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
7 February - Oh look. The Pest and eFail pens an article from that most prolific of writers, "Anonymous".
"Everything they had crawled through the gutter to achieve was now within their grasp, and the roaches finally crawled from the woodwork to claim their prize, namely, the complete overthrow of America. They no longer have to hide. Their work is completed. Agenda 21, the UN Small Arms Treaty, the appointment of Muslim judges to major courts by the likes of would-be “conservative” heroes like Chris Christie. Oh, sure, there are still gems to be added to their crowning glory, but that is fast being carried out by all who now corrupt the halls of government."
Ah, paranoia.
"The time has come. To shut one’s eyes after the Malihi fiasco is to just prolong the inevitable. Mexico has been allowed to sue a sovereign American State standing partner with our very own “government.” Our national sovereignty is slowly but surely being handed over to foreign entities…Libya, anyone?"
*Raises an eyebrow*
"The refusal on the part of “his” AG to prosecute the New Black Panthers. Do I need to go on? You are the choir….those of us here already know all the sordid details. We have all watched and prayed as “R’s” tried to convince us they were NOT part of the evil….RIIIIIIGHT, thank you, Crybaby Boehner."
Someone really needs their meds adjusted.
"IMHO, anyone who has worked here these many months and does not understand that is doomed to watch musloids remove the last vestiges of Liberty from us."
Someone is also a racist piece of crap.
"It is time for watering the Tree of Liberty. The price of that Liberty is eternal vigilance, and we let our guard down. Now the only way, I believe, to set things straight, is to start where our Founders started, and once again BEG GOD to give us the strength and courage to risk our lives, our fortunes, and our Sacred Honor. It’s a mighty price, but it sure beats the alternative."
So Sharon Rondeau had the courage to print a call for revolt and the overthrow of the government, from someone without the moral courage to own up to their words.
Assuming, of course, it's not Rondeau herself.
7 February - For someone who said that he would accept the judgement of the court, David Farrar seems awfully unwilling to accept the judgement of the court.
"David Farrar
February 7th, 2012
4:07 pm
I suppose the only way we can find out now if candidate Barack Obama was even born in the United States is to appeal Sec. Kemp’s decision, because there was absolutely no birth certificate entered into evidence in my January 26th ALC hearing.
And before anyone and throw up the FF & C clause at me, please understand, Hawaiian Health officials can only attest to the fact that the information contained on one of their certified birth certificates accurately reflects what is in their files, not to the accuracy of that information itself.
ex animo
davidfarrar"
7 February - Dr. Orly sounds a bit annoyed that SoS Kemp confirmed Judge Malihi's decision. (Malware and redirect warning)
"We are GULAG bound. Kemp confirmed Malihi’s insane ruling. I am conferring with my clients our next steps
Posted on | February 7, 2012"
7 February - "Reality Check" calls out Mario Apuzzo's cheerleading from behind.
"It has been interesting to watch the evolution of Mario’s reliance on his incorrect interpretation of Minor v Happersett, which he now touts as the defining case for the definition of a natural born citizen. You would think this important case would have been referenced in his one and only eligibility case. However I checked the Original Complaint in Kerchner v Obama filed on Inauguration Day in 2009, the Amended Complaint, filed on the following day, and the Second Amended Complaint, filed on February 20,2009. The Minor case is never cited nor even mentioned in any of the complaints. Even on his blog he only mentions Minor v Happersett in passing an an article on January 8, 2009 and then not again until June 2009. My theory is that like all the other Birther attorneys the “Two Citizen Parent” de Vattel nonsense was invented out of thin air in late 2008 (primarily by Leo Donofrio) when it was becoming more apparent every day that then candidate Obama was born in Hawaii and every piece of evidence supported that conclusion. The Birthers had to have a fall back position and a little Google work gave it to them. After the release of the LFBC the attachment to the nonsense theory became necessary and they began openly lying about Minor v Happersett out of complete desperation."
Well, Apuzzo originally didn't have Donofrio's crib notes to work from in his case.
"I don’t think Mario will take my advice on the Tisdale case. First it would be money out of his pocket or out of his benefactor Charlie Kerchner’s pocket. Kerchner would rather spend his money on full page ads in the Moonie Times with silly Venn Diagrams. Second, I don’t think Mario is up to enduring another humiliating loss in the courts. He barely escaped sanctions in the 3rd Circuit when he appealed the lower court dismissal of Kerchner v Obama and the court was not amused when he failed to cite another case that was directly on point, Berg v Obama that had been before the same court just a few months before. Some of Mario’s best legal work was his groveling before the 3rd circuit in his reply to the Order to Show Cause (OSC) in that case."
Apuzzo likes to play legal scholar for the birtherstani. It provides him attention without actually risking anything legally.
7 February - One gets the feeling the inmates at Birther Report are a bit upset at SoS Kemp.
"Anonymous said…[Reply]So Hatfield will now be filing against the SoS and the state of Georgia. The Georgia Attorney General's office will defend.
Here is a prediction.
Hatfield loses in Superior Court and any Appeals Court.
The Georgia Supreme Court refuses to hear the case.
The United States Supreme Court refuses to hear the case.
February 7, 2012 10:05 AM "
More than likely.
"Earl Butz said…[Reply]This issue now acquires double urgency as apparently both of Governor Romney's parents are Mexican, not United States, citizens.
We must not allow non-Americans access to the presidency, regardless of their party, creed, or origin.
February 7, 2012 10:43 AM "
Wow. Racist much??
"Dealio said…[Reply]Where the hell have you guys been? Revolution is the only way. I repeat, a revolution is the only way. I have to assume all involved in covering for the illegal know they are gambling with their liberty- they're betting against us. There would have to be a minimum of 20 million in Washington to clean this up. Every freedom loving red-blooded American better start planning for this. By the way, they know we're coming. A showdown it shall be. Every freedom loving red-blooded American must plan to be there. I believe this is it. Any further attempts seeking justice in any existing court is absolutely and obviously futile.
February 7, 2012 10:57 AM "
"Anonymous said…[Reply]Take heart comrades of USSA, Amerika will rise again from the ashes like a Phoenix. (as in AZ)
The decisions being made in blatant disregard to reason itself and any semblance to the rule of law reveals the degree of evil, corruption, and moral decay the present government leadership consists.
The battle continues to sharpen our discernment and realize the 2 party system is fraudulent. the people out of necessity will rise up and shake free of tyranny.
February 7, 2012 11:38 AM "
"Dealio said…[Reply]I agree. We need a leader. If one does not emerge soon, then we shall assemble and choose one. We'll have to do this the old fashioned way.
February 7, 2012 2:11 PM "
"Where's my civil war??? I WANT MY CIVIL WAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
7 February - World Nut Daily trumpets the fact that Hatfield, Van Irion, and Taitz are going to appeal Kemp's decision.
"An administrative law judge in Georgia who held hearings on citizens’ complaints that Barack Obama isn’t eligible to be president and so shouldn’t be on the 2012 presidential ballot in the state failed to follow U.S. Supreme Court precedent, according to one of the attorneys representing clients bringing the complaints."
You mean the U.S. Supreme Court precedent that the birthers keep misquoting? Or the U.S. Supreme Court precedents that the birthers keep ignoring??
"Hatfield said the good thing about the decision is that it came quickly, and the attorneys can escalate the arguments to the appellate level now well in advance of the March 6 Super Tuesday primaries, in which Georgia takes part.
He said he wrote to Kemp as the process was developing, outlining several failings on the part of the ALJ, and he confirmed some of those issues now are being prepared for presentation to the appellate level.
“I will be filing that on behalf of Carl Swensson and Kevin Richard Powell just as soon as I can get it drafted,” he told WND."
So, during the Georgia State Legislature session, we're going to see a Republican state representative who is representing in court a Republican county committee chairman to get a Democratic candidate for President off the ballot even after the Republican Secretary of State ruled in favor of said candidate?
Oh, yeah, that will go well.
7 February - "Peach Pundit" comments on Brian Kemp's decision.
"Several of our reality challenged friends here stated that Malihi was a Muslim in response to his ruling last week. One can only guess that they will now descend on Athens to check out the Madrasa where Brian Kemp obviously went to school."
8 February - Irony much?? Dr. Orly breathlessly posts this headline: (malware and redirect warning)
"Great news!!! According to the FBI Hussein Obama/Soebarkah/Soetoro/Bounnel (or whatever he is) can be arrested as a domestic terrorist: he is using fake IDs, committing white-collar crimes and holding illegal courts. Call Robert Mueller, director of the FBI, demand immediate arrest of Obama on all of the above charges
Posted on | February 8, 2012 "
She then goes on to cite an FBI article about - get this - the Sovereign Citizen movement!
Does she have any idea how many of her supporters and fellow birther travelers are also SovCits??
Even more ironically, the article points out:
"This causes all kinds of problems—and crimes. For example, many sovereign citizens don’t pay their taxes. They hold illegal courts that issue warrants for judges and police officers. They clog up the court system with frivolous lawsuits and liens against public officials to harass them. And they use fake money orders, personal checks, and the like at government agencies, banks, and businesses.That’s just the beginning. Not every action taken in the name of the sovereign citizen ideology is a crime, but the list of illegal actions committed by these groups, cells, and individuals is extensive (and puts them squarely on our radar). In addition to the above, sovereign citizens:
Commit murder and physical assault; Threaten judges, law enforcement professionals, and government personnel; Impersonate police officers and diplomats; Use fake currency, passports, license plates, and driver’s licenses; and Engineer various white-collar scams, including mortgage fraud and so-called “redemption” schemes.Sovereign citizens are often confused with extremists from the militia movement. But while sovereign citizens sometimes use or buy illegal weapons, guns are secondary to their anti-government, anti-tax beliefs. On the other hand, guns and paramilitary training are paramount to militia groups."
"Threaten judges, law enforcement professionals, and government personnel" is something Dr. Orly does routinely, as is "clog up the court system with frivolous lawsuits and liens against public officials to harass them". And she started to get involved in "Engineer various white-collar scams, including mortgage fraud and so-called “redemption” schemes" with CEL3.
8 February - Dr. Orly's latest great idea?? Ask SoS Brian Kemp for mediation or arbitration on his decision rather than an appeal! (malware and redirect warning)
"I do not have any difficulty opening the attachment, I do have some difficulty comprehending the magnitude of public corruption and treason against the United States of America and its'; Constitution exhibited by this office."
Yes, because insulting the Secretary of State and calling him a traitor will make him see the light, right?
"Please, let me know, whether Secretary Kemp will be willing to consider an appeal of his decision. If he is not willing to consider the appeal, we will be going to higher courts and bringing charges against both Obama and Kemp."
Oh now THAT'S going to go over well. Looking for your next Georgia Order to Show Cause??
"Please, let me know, if Mr. Kemp is willing to enter into mediation or arbitration prior to filing charges in higher courts. sincerely, Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ"
I think the words are "hell no"
You know, this is really a gross violation of the State Bar Of California's Rules of Professional Conduct, which reads:
Rule 5-100 Threatening Criminal, Administrative, or Disciplinary Charges(A) A member shall not threaten to present criminal, administrative, or disciplinary charges to obtain an advantage in a civil dispute.
(B) As used in paragraph (A) of this rule, the term "administrative charges" means the filing or lodging of a complaint with a federal, state, or local governmental entity which may order or recommend the loss or suspension of a license, or may impose or recommend the imposition of a fine, pecuniary sanction, or other sanction of a quasi-criminal nature but does not include filing charges with an administrative entity required by law as a condition precedent to maintaining a civil action.
(C) As used in paragraph (A) of this rule, the term "civil dispute" means a controversy or potential controversy over the rights and duties of two or more parties under civil law, whether or not an action has been commenced, and includes an administrative proceeding of a quasi-civil nature pending before a federal, state, or local governmental entity.
Of course, if the State Bar Of California actually CARED about their rules of professional conduct, Dr. Orly would have been disbarred years ago.
8 February - The Pest and eFail resumes it's fine tradition of whiney letters and interviews.
"Mr. Jackson has written to his county sheriff and U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John G. Roberts regarding his doubts about Obama’s constitutional eligibility to serve as president. "
And let me guess, threw a tantrum when he was ignored, right?
"The sheriff is the highest law enforcement officer in his county, reportedly with authority exceeding that of federal agents or the President of the United States."
Oh look. Sovereign Citizen claptrap.
"Jackson had also filed an objection to Mitt Romney’s candidacy on January 13, 2012, but withdrew it shortly thereafter to concentrate on his objection to Obama’s eligibility to run."
So the safe white mormon was better than the scary black man?
"To date, ballot challenges, which are permitted by law in all 50 states, have been heard or decided in New Hampshire, Georgia, Illinois, and Alabama. "
And to date, the answer in New Hampshire, Georgia, Illinois, and Alabama has been "No".
"Jackson’s challenge was responded to by Obama’s two attorneys with a Motion to Strike and Dismiss on January 24, 2012 and included a copy of the case Ankeny v. Daniels, upon which Judge Michael Malihi in Georgia relied upon to determine that Obama is a “natural born Citizen.”
I suspect the birthers ignoring the Ankeny v. Daniels is really coming back to bite them hard.
"When they made a motion to dismiss the petition, I stood up and asked the Board if I would have an opportunity to address the Board based on the fact that I was a registered voter in the state of Illinois; that’s why I was here. He interrupted the chairman, got his attention, and said that they were not going to allow me to speak because they had made a motion that the ‘birther’ issue that had been going on for the last three or four years had already been dealt with, and they felt that there was no forum here based on law for them to address my petition.”
In other words, "we've heard this crap before."
8 February - And it looks like David Farrar decided to hang with Dr. Orly after all. (malware and redirect warning)
"Orly Taitz to David
4:13 PM (14 hours ago)
I am filing an appeal. Please, let me know, whether I should include you in the appeal, or whether I should do it without you
Dr Orly TaitzESQ
(redacted)
David Farrar to me
show details 8:07 PM (10 hours ago)
Hi Orly,
Count me in, assuming same terms.
But assuming Kemp received material from the defendant ex parte, can he do that? And can we appeal that as one of our basis?
david"
Isn't it funny how they always say they'll accept the ruling of the court - and then never do when it doesn't go their way?
8 February - The Institute for Research and Education on Human Rights writes an article about the Article II Super Duper Extra Crispy PAC.
"The super racist super PAC is run by a who's who of Tea Party birthers. Helen Tansey, a disgruntled former Democrat from Virginia who runs the website, T-Room, is the Article II super PAC director. Tansey has been highly critical of those concerned about the impact of birther attacks on the 14th Amendment, "trust me, NO thinking person is fooled by the blah blah blah coming from the extreme left side of the aisle regarding their silly 14th amd blabber. I know. I was one of you, that is until you put forward a candidate who has tri-allegiances – Britian[sic]/Kenya, Indonesia and American. Good grief, not all the Dem's fell in line, rather thousands of us high tailed it outta there."
Gary Wilmott of Simi Valley, California serves as the PAC treasurer. In addition to running the vitriolic birther blog, Give Us Liberty, Wilmott is also an active member of the Ventura County Tea Party. Oxnard resident George Miller, who sits on the steering committee of the Ventura County Tea Party, is also listed as a board member of the Article II super PAC. Despite the well-known stance of leaders like Miller, the Ventura County Tea Party partnered with the Tea Party Express last fall to be an official co-sponsor of the Tea Party Express / CNN GOP presidential candidate debate.
Retired Army Captain Pamela Barnett of Sacramento is also on the Article II PAC board of directors. Barnett runs the birther site Obama Ballot Challenge and has been a plaintiff in lawsuits filed by the self-anointed queen of the Obama-isn't-a real-American crowd, Orly Taitz. Barnett has also served as a campaign manager for Taitz when she unsuccessfully ran for California Secretary of State in 2010 (Taitz claims to be running for Senate this year).
Richard (Rich) Garoutte of Eugene, Oregon rounds out the Article II super PAC board of directors. He is also currently serving as the NW Regional Coordinator for the Birther Summit USA and has been actively supporting the Obama State Ballot Challenge 2012."
Solid B-list of birtherdom there.
"Aggressive moves by the Article II PAC group have generated dissension in the birther ranks. Orly Taitz, once a close ally to several of the Article II figures (and a member of Tea Party Nation), openly trashed the group and called on her followers to stay away from it and any blogs that advertise for the group."
Yeah, because they wouldn't give her any money.
8 February - Dean Haskins takes a break from Orly-bashing to ask questions about Joe Arpaio's "cold case" posse.
"As most people are likely aware, during a law enforcement investigation, those who are conducting it cannot reveal any of the evidence they are examining, as doing so can often hamper the investigation itself. However, there has been a concerted effort by someone playing the role of an attorney (very poorly, I might add) to either hijack or sabotage this investigation, as was evidenced by her mailing an unenforceable, downloaded “subpoena” form from Georgia's OSAH website. This was an attempt to “force” Sheriff Joe into prematurely revealing the products of his investigation, which, thankfully, was seen as the ignoble and ignorable act that it was. It was an attempted hijacking."
No, wait, he's still taking pot-shots at Dr. Orly, never mind.
"Before proceeding, I want to explain something important, as this is crucial to understanding what is repeatedly happening to our initiatives. Orly Taitz seems to display a need to attach herself to every possible aspect of our movement in a tireless effort to remain the self-exalted face of it."
You just now noticed she's a legal remora??
Remember, in Dr. Orly's world, it's all about her. If a birther organization fails to make it all about her, then they're traitors and "obots". Remember how she's vilified Philip Berg and Gary Kreep, even though without Berg to steal from and Kreep's initial use of her as an assistant in Keyes v Bowen, Dr. Orly wouldn't have had a start in birtherstan?
"Recently, Orly posted this on her website:
“Arpaio’s unwillingness to testify tells me that:
a. he does not have any new evidence aside from what I provided him.”
Folks, not only is that statement delusional, it is an outright lie."
Dr. Orly lies? Shock and amazement! Next the news will be the sun comes up in the East.
"It should be understood that the Cold Case Posse never considered any evidence submitted by Orly Taitz; but it developed, and successfully utilized many other sources of evidence. Early on in the investigation, Taitz attempted to provide evidence, and was instructed as to how to submit evidence to the MCSO/ Cold Case Posse. Unfortunately, and for reasons only she could know, she refused to follow those directions, so nothing she attempted to provide was ever considered."
Look at her past courtroom behavior. She's ALWAYS shown an inability to follow even the simplest directions. Keyes/Barnett v Obama was delayed in part due to her inability to affect proper service upon the Department of Justice, and Judge Carter had to force her to properly serve the defense attorneys in his chambers.
"One of the sources close to the investigation shared with me a phone conversation he had with the dentist in which she requested his help in gaining a personal audience with Sheriff Joe. When he declined her request, she responded to him that he was “worthless,” and that he was part of “the controlled opposition.”
Sound familiar?"
Dr. Orly doesn't have friends, supporters, or even clients.
She has tools. And when the tool stops being useful, she discards it as worthless.
She's a classic narcissist.
"Additionally, sources close to the investigation are aware of rumors regarding possible attempts to turn the press conference into a “dog and pony show” with signs, demonstrators, and even banners flown by airplanes."
You mean like what World Nut Daily does??
And are cardboard cutouts okay??
"As this press conference will reveal the preliminary results of a professional law enforcement investigation, such activity would be highly inappropriate, and could potentially cause the media to trivialize the entire process."
It's a birther event. It starts out trivial and rolls downhill from there.
8 February - Once again, Padawan Pauly preaches about the Sacred Sperm of Citizenship.
"However, if you are not born in the country, or you do not have parents who are both citizens of that same country, then the rule and convention under both International Law and Natural Law and U.S. law prior to the 1930s to which Justice Ginsburg is referring is that the offspring “naturally follow the condition of their fathers.” In other words, you are born a natural citizen of your father’s country and that is also a natural born citizen, regardless of where you are born or who your mother is, and no one can deny you your natural inherited political birth rights to membership in your father’s clan and society and allegiance to your birth father and his country: not the soil territory of a foreign country; not even a foreign mother. "
Oh, and not just any Sacred Sperm.
"So to be consistent with Minor v Happersett and all other controlling Supreme Court cases, we see that in Article II, the term “natural born Citizen” just means those who are born to citizen fathers. It did not originally mean females or Blacks, but in light of the 15th Amendment and the 19th Amendment, one must expand Article II nbC to include females and Black people so that these parts of the Constitution do not clash with Article II. Without including these Amendments to expand the scope of Article II, it would otherwise require a constitutional Amendment for females or Blacks to be President, especially since most Blacks were not even State citizens in many of the States at the time of the adoption of the Constitution and Article II."
So to recap, in Padawan Pauly's mind, to be Natural Born citizens, one must have a white, US citizen father. Because, after all, the founders intended that the children take on the citizenship and condition of their fathers.
Funny, I don't recall any of the children that Thomas Jefferson sired upon Sally Hemings as being granted US citizenship. Oh, right, Beverley Hemings, Harriet Hemings, James Madison Hemmings, and Thomas Eston Hemings all took after the condition of their MOTHER - in other words, they were born enslaved. James Madison and Thomas Eston weren't even freed until after their father's death.
"Judge Malihi is wrong because Obama does not qualify via his mother or place of birth. "
Funny, US law and the US Constitution fail to agree.
"In fact, Mr. Obama is disqualified by his birth to a foreign father who was never a U.S. citizen, which, by International Law and Natural Law, makes him at birth to be a natural born member of his father’s country of Kenya despite his mother’s citizenship or place of birth."
Funny, US law and the US Constitution fail to agree.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,[75] that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,”
[Notice the use of upper case "Men" and lower case "men" in the same sentence indicating that in the upper case instance the writer specifically means males.]"
Sexist much Padawan Pauly??
"The purpose, of course, was to secure the natural political rights of males of this country. The Minor court found that the natural political rights that exist in the Constitution, such as the right to be President or to vote, for example, are only for U.S. males, proving that the entire purpose of the Constitution is to secure male citizens’ political rights."
Padawan Pauly doesn't seem to have heard of something called the 19th Amendment
"In one fell swoop, Judge Malihi has eviscerated the political rights of U.S. males meant to be secured and protected by Article II nbC and the Constitution as a whole, and he has found that Article II and the Constitution were not created by the males of this American society to secure and protect their American political rights in order to pass on their American birthright heritage to their offspring, but instead was created to provide political rights for foreign males for their offspring!"
*Blink* *Blink* *BLINK* "Beware, young padawan, for otherwise your pure white US citizen women shall hear the jungle drums, and have their wombs polluted by the unclean sperm of foreign citizenship."
Seriously, I'm amazed anyone in the 21st century would BELIEVE this tripe!
"Does judge Malihi really expect us to accept that those who wrote nbC qualifications into Article II intended to not secure their own political rights as males who were citizens of this country, but rather intended to secure political rights for foreign non-citizen males and the offspring of those foreign males?
The judges must think that we are a Nation of Fools."
There is a fool here. A racist, sexist tool. And Pauly is his name.
Ah Patrick, another great entry with lotsa laughs! Thanks for your continued hard work (and great wit).
Posted by: WWJD | February 08, 2012 at 07:17 PM
Seconded.
Oh, how I wish every one of those Keyboard Commandos who have said "it's time for armed revolt" would just pack up their guns and head on down to Washington already..
And where can I buy a ticket to their funerals?
I exaggerate of course, but egad... All this big brave talk... There are only two possibilities: 1) They are liars, and don't really believe the Republic is in danger, or 2) they do believe America faces imminent peril, and they're too chickenshit to risk their scrawny necks defending her.
So which is it, "patriots"? Are you LIARS or CHICKENS?
Posted by: Thomas Brown | February 08, 2012 at 08:38 PM
Yes, Farrar has predictably moved from claiming that he will accept the ruling of the judge/SoS to jumping onboard an appeal attempt with Mad Orly in no time flat...
Even after he proclaimed that he did not approve of her reactions and statements to the SoS...
Even after he wrote a whiney letter to the SoS to partially attempt to disassociate himself from Orly's statements (yet still whine that the judge was unfair at the same time)...
Yet, when Orly offers him the chance to be part of her appeal, he immediately leaps and asks "how high"...
Sorry Farrar, but you can't have it both ways. By sticking with your disreputable lawyer, you share the burden of all the awful and irresponsible things she does. After all, even though we know you are just her "useful tool" in all this, by legal definition YOU are the client and she works on your behalf. You can be held to account for her behaviors and actions. So have fun with that appeal...and don't come crying to anyone if you find fees and sanctions headed your way as a result. You chose this and you own it.
Finally Mr. Farrar, don't expect anyone to take you seriously when you claim that you will respect the rule of law. It is quite clear that you won't accept any reality that doesn't "agree" with your delusions. You are just as hopeless and unworthy of being taken seriously as every other hard-core Birther out there. A pox on all you whiney sore losers.
Posted by: G | February 08, 2012 at 08:39 PM
Orly must need a forklift to carry around her shit list.
Posted by: Glix | February 08, 2012 at 10:08 PM
> Once again, Padawan Pauly preaches about the Sacred Sperm of Citizenship.
I can't believe he keeps his "Citizen with a capital C" crap alive. Doesn't he realize *every* noun in the Constitution is capitalized?
But it's interesting his delusion is enough to get a decidedly un-Vattelist article published on the Pee and Eee. After all, he claims Minor vs. Happersett did not define "natural born Citizen" but only "natural born citizen" which, according to the bogus Jedi, is a different thing.
Ultimately, this boils down again to the racist "14th amendment citizen" argument that a black man can never be an Article II natural born (C|c)itizen.
Posted by: The Magic M | February 09, 2012 at 02:03 AM
Mr. Farrar seems confused about what FF&C means. Once Hawaii confirms that the BC or COLB that Pres Obama has was issued by them, that's it. Every other state would have to accept that he was born there. It makes no sense to think that all it means is they have to accept that the info is in Hawaai's files, but it might not be true.
Posted by: ASK Esq | February 09, 2012 at 07:07 AM
The crazies in Birtherstan just keep getting crazy. My biggest worry is one of them will totally go off the deep end and be violent.
Posted by: Xyxox | February 09, 2012 at 08:55 AM
"So that is what he is doing now. In for an ounce, in for a pound."
I love how they're so ignorant they don't know the saying is from England: In for a penny, in for a pound. You know, the country whose common-law conception of natural born citizenship is the one repeatedly affirmed by U.S. courts over the past 200 some years.
Posted by: Greg Brown | February 09, 2012 at 02:23 PM
Hey Patty,
Spent a little time today reading some of the posts by your mindless lapdogs. Got a real chuckle outa the 2/5/12 comments by 'goodgravy'. Got yourself a keeper there. Like you, he too knows how to write fiction. It's obvious he's spent alot of time reading Grimms Fairy Tales. In his world Pinocchio as well as Peter Pan & Tinkerbell are the real thing.
I do have to give you some credit. You're no dummy and know exactly what you're doing. As a site [BadFiction], dedicated to distorting factual truths posted on other sites about the phoney marxist 0bumm0, your ongoing deceit and the ignorance by your mindless lapdogs has provided me, and probably countless other patriotic Americans, with alot of laughs.
Thx,
RamboIke {riding roughshod over ignorance & deceit]
Posted by: Rambo Ike | February 09, 2012 at 03:15 PM
Xyxox - I suspect it's a matter of when they go off the rails than if.
Posted by: Patrick McKinnion | February 09, 2012 at 03:21 PM
Rambo Ike - I find it rather funny to listen to a birther claim to be "riding roughshod over ignorance & deceit", when that's pretty much the birther stock in trade.
Posted by: Patrick McKinnion | February 09, 2012 at 03:23 PM
Im honored to be mentioned with Mr McKinnion. Thanks!
RamboIke.....bwaha..cough....bwaha.....oh...jeeez....the level of discourse within birfoonistan is remarkably low right now, even for the inbred, blissfully ignorant xenophobic lot that drools together in the echochamber of the hatriots.....so brave, in their undies in the basement, hiding from the rest of their families.....so proudly uneducated. Watching them jump around like child molesters at Chuck E. Cheese every time Orly proudly proclaims SUCCESS!, only to be told NO like a five year old never gets boring. Keep up the good work Patrick.
Posted by: goodgravy | February 09, 2012 at 03:58 PM
Douchebag pedophile coward RamItUpMyPipe, like so many other clueless drooling Birfer traitors, should try to step back from Psychotic and leave it at Neurotic. The difference, as anyone with an education (i.e. not a Birfer) can tell you, is that psychotics can't tell what is real, whereas neurotics know what reality is, but really don't like it.
It's going to be such fun watching him cry little baby girl tears when every single Judge, member of Law Enforcement, active Miltary Commander, and Constitutional Scholar treats Birfers like the babbling retards they are and ignores them completely.
Any one of Mr. Obama's fingernails is brighter and more manly than quivering pussies like RamIt.
Posted by: Thomas Brown | February 09, 2012 at 04:46 PM
Birfoons have already committed plenty of violence: the recent mass murdering kook in Norway, Breitbart or whatsitsface is a birfoon. The same will happen in USA if no preventive measures are taken.
Posted by: Joe Acerbic | February 09, 2012 at 08:11 PM
@ goodgravy
Your ID looks to be synonymous with something parasitic. Like a leech sucking off the welfare system and feels it's entitled.
You're confused as to what I said. I didn't say I saw you and Patty in the same light. It's obvious your master Patty at least meets the requirements for an average IQ. You, on the other hand, wasn't so blessed at birth in your cranial area, and it shows by how easily you have been duped by your master Patty's cockamamie.
@ Thomas BrownNose
0bumm0 manly?
If you consider homo-romps with fag Larry Sinclair, trips to the gay Chicago Bath House, and a number of others mentioned your hero 0bumm0 has engaged with in the Lavender Hill Mob, then that tells us alot about you and what you see as manly.
Posted by: Rambo Ike | February 11, 2012 at 08:10 PM
Rambo Ike - What I find amazing is that anyone gives Larry Sinclair any credibility. After all, we're talking someone who, prior to 2008, had a long history of fraud, drug abuse, and felony criminal convictions.
But then I ask the same question about Lucas Smith, who also has a long pre-2008 history of fraud, forgery, and felony criminal convictions.
Posted by: Patrick McKinnion | February 11, 2012 at 09:19 PM
"Rambo Ike" sounds very much like a name of a member of "U.S. Male Corps" just like Jeff Gannon. (if you google any of that, for Cthulhu's sake don't go to the image search)
Posted by: Joe Acerbic | February 12, 2012 at 11:55 AM
@ Patty,
I'll agree with ya on Lucas Smith. Has he ever provide any proof he was in Africa? {lodging or diner receipts].
Sinclair's credibility is on the same level as 0bumm0's. Both have an admitted history of drug abuse, and lying comes natural to both.
2 Classic Whoppers [paraphrasing]:
0bumm0: "My birth in 1961 was a product of 2 people inspired by the Selma Civil Rights March of 1965"
0bumm0: "Don't tell me I don't have a claim to Selma" [The truth: He don't. His African ancestors were Arab-African slave traffickers and owners].
@Joe,
You outed yourself. So it's male-homo porn that captures your interest. Does your parents know what you've been doing on the computer?
Posted by: Rambo Ike | February 15, 2012 at 04:45 PM
Dear "Rambo": sorry, but you don't capture my interest. You'll have to play with your conservative colleague Jeff.
Posted by: Joe Acerbic | February 15, 2012 at 09:40 PM