In today's dispatches, The State of Alaska responds to Gordon Epperly. Gordon Epperly uses a unique legal argument towards the US Attorney, claiming she has no jurisdiction over a member of the Schlong-American community.
We have two videos from Swiftboat liar Jerome Corsi, with some extra special bundles of lies (not to mention a few rather curious slips of the tongue that suggest that there might be some political purpose to it all. Yeah, I know, shock and amazement.) He's also got a serious hate-on for debunkers as well.
Also, Corsi also takes time to warm up the stale leftovers of the Indonesian Citizenship claim, under the time-tested rule of "throw everything against the wall and hope it sticks!"
3 August - We have the motion to dismiss by the State of Alaska in Gordon Epperly's racist Alaska Birther Ballot Jihad filing.
(Scribd link here)
"Plaintiff’s statements regarding race, gender, citizenship, and criminal conduct are repugnant and absurd; and as explained more fully below, plaintiff lack standing and this court has no jurisdiction over his claims. Further, plaintiff’s claims are not ripe and he fails to allege any plausible, non-speculative factual allegation to support them. "
And they're not shy in pointing out the waste of time this is.
"Fortunately—or perhaps unfortunately—there is a wealth of case law supporting the division’s position: the current presidency has been besieged by litigation of exactly this nature. And federal courts have universally dismissed allegations similar or identical to plaintiff’s, in some cases sanctioning litigants for wasting the courts’ time in adjudicating them. Accordingly, this Court should grant the division’s motion to dismiss."
Followed by the usual hit parade of birther courtroom failures, and a request to dismiss the case with prejudice (appropriately).
5 August - Swiftboat liar Jerome Corsi releases a video with a new conspiracy theory - that Barack Obama was married in college. He releases this on his own "1776nation.com" blog.
Basically, Corsi sees a ring on Barack Obama's hand in his college pictures. And, not seeming to understand that someone might actually wear a ring as decoration, puts two and two together and comes up with aardvark.
At 0:27, he says he's going to present "evidence" that Barack Obama is gay or bisexual in September. Gee, sounds like he's already starting the smear campaign, doesn't it?
From 1:33 to 2:20, Corsi basically waves incoherently at the pictures in his articles, not seeming to understand that the viewer can only see indistinct images on Corsi's monitor.
At 2:21, "He's not married, has far as we know, unless of course this is a love affair with his Pakistani male roommate".
At 2:31, "This is a homosexual symbol for women to stay away, because he married to, same-sex marriage to his roommate boyfriend."
That's not a dog whistle, that's almost an entire bloody dog calliope!
At 4:15 he claims that Sarah Obama still claims President Obama was born in Kenya. Corsi seems to have overlooked entire transcripts, newspaper articles, and interviews where Sarah Obama claims the exact opposite…..
At 1:08, "…of Obama when he was in college, beginning in about 1971".
At 2:08, "these are the pictures that Lisa Jackson took of Obama at Occidental in the 70's, early 71-72"
You know what's funny about this?? Corsi wants people to trust his "scholarship" and "investigation skills", but it's hard to do when he claims Presidnet Obama was in college when he was ten years old.
Fact checking skills - The human face rash doesn't have them.
8:58, "As I say, there's going to be much more coming out about this. As I published in WND, Larry Sinclair is now, charges that he was a homosexual partner with Obama."
Because the testimony from a convicted felon with a history of fraud is so reliable.
At 9:50 he signs off, then angles the camera and his monitor to once again show blurry indistinct pictures from World Nut Daily.
6 August - Van Irion tries to appeal his Arizona birther ballot jihad.
(Scribd link here)
6 August - The Western Center for "Journalism" posts a 13 minute long video by Jerome Corsi, to "1776 Nation"
So what Corsi nuggets do we have? Well, the human face rash starts out repeating the same lies that Joe Arpaio repeated at his last dog and pony show. And he still refuses to admit they used the 1968 coding manual rather than the 1961 manual. As a smoking gun it continues to be a leaking water pistol.
At 2:51 he hints that Arpaio may try for an "October Surprise" of even more birther lies.
At 3:04 he makes a sneering comment about the "Obots" that "refute everything just to refute it". Now we know Corsi is thin-skinned and petty, but it sounds like he's really upset that his steaming pack of lies continues to be refuted.
Around the 4:30 mark, he suggests that Corsi. Farah, Arpaio, and the rest of the smear merchants are planning to amp things up after Labor Day.
At 5:09 he says it's possible that a "knockout blow" could happen with a court case. Knowing the birther track record in court, that seems unlikely. Particularly since Corsi seem to think a court can overrule the Full Faith and Credit clause of the US Constitution and order the State of Hawaii to open up their records.
At 5:37 though, he admits that it's more likely to happen "in the court of public opinion." Which suggests that Corsi knows damn well this is nothing more than blatant propaganda.
At 7:25 he pimps Joel Gilbert's completely fact-free movie.
At 7:50 he claims Arpaio is building a criminal case and a crime has been committed. Gee, if that's the case, Arpaio seems awfully unwilling to bring it to a district attorney or attorney general. Almost as if he knows his "facts" won't hold up in court. And at 7:55 -he says "Remember that September and October is the time to do it"
Any idea that this is anything other than dirty political tricks is pretty much shot down by that one statement. Particularly when followed by this telling "money shot" statement: (Bold face mine)
8:00 - "You're going to find that Sheriff Arpaio's group is going to get increasingly close mouthed about the evidence that has been created".
Funny, but one doesn't usually "create" evidence in an investigation.
I honestly can't see that as anything other than an inadvertent admission by Jerome Corsi that he KNOWS the "evidence" that Arpaio, Zullo, Corsi, and Farah have been promoting is nothing more than complete and total bovine byproducts.
At 8:08, "The Obots are dying to find out what Sheriff Arpaio has there, they're going nuts over on various Obot websites, demanding we show this, demanding that the investigation produce this document, another document, they've lost their mind".
Hmmm….interesting "Alinsky-style" tactics there Corsi. Mind you, I don't think "wondering what debunked pack of lies Arpaio is going to trot out like a good little puppy this time" is "going nuts", but that's just me.
The debunkers have REALLY gotten under his florid magenta skin though.
At 9:00 - "Send money". And at 11:30, he pretty much says "it doesn't matter if you hate Mitt Romney, vote for him anyway".
And in comments:
"joeprice says: August 6, 2012 at 6:09 pm America agrees with both Joe and Jerome at this time but what really isn't understood is that if this half breed imposter is not eligible to run for President in 90 days, this means that he is an illegitimate President and he has been for the last for years. This also means that by law,,,,,,,,, ALL WHITE HOUSE DOCUMENTS SIGNED BY BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA ARE NULL AND VOID ! ALL EXECUTIVE ORDERS ARE NULL AND VOID !"
August 6, 2012 at 7:37 pm
So far the whitehouse illegal lawn jockey has delivered to the American people 2 totally different birth certificates, this is is FRAUD and enough to either take obama off the democratic ticket for president, and charge and convict him of treason"
7 August - Continuing his current trend of throwing anything he can up against the wall and hope it sticks, Swiftboat Liar Jerome Corsi reports a claim of "absolute proof" that President Obama was an Indonesian Citizen.
His source? If you guessed "Conspiracy nut Wayne Allyn Root again", you would be right on the money.
"Wayne Allyn Root, in an interview with fill-in host Joe Pagliarulo on the “Glenn Beck Program,” said he received a phone call at 4 a.m. this morning from an investigative reporter with Breitbart.com probing Obama’s past in Indonesia.
The reporter, according to Root, a former Libertarian Party vice-presidential nominee, said he has “absolute proof” Obama was adopted by his mother’s new husband and became an Indonesian citizen.
“It’s a fact, it’s not a question,” the reporter told Root. “I’m looking at [the proof] right now.”
So we have an anonymous source reported to an unreliable source on a complete nutcase's radio show, and repeating repeated by a known liar.
And that's "absolute proof"???
"WND has been unable to find an Indonesian law in force when Obama was in Jakarta that required a child to be an Indonesian citizen to attend public schools in Indonesia."
Maybe because no such law ever existed??
"If Obama were adopted by Lolo Soetoro after the age of 5, he would have had to undergo the Indonesian naturalization process to become an Indonesian citizen.
If Obama had been naturalized, he would have been required to renounce U.S. citizenship, prove Indonesian language proficiency and knowledge of the history of Indonesia.
To this point, no official Indonesian adoption papers proving Lolo Soetoro legally adopted Obama have been presented; nor is there any proof Obama was naturalized as an Indonesian citizen when he was there with his stepfather and mother."
And according to US law, a minor US citizen cannot renounce US citizenship or have it renounced for them.
7 August - Haven't heard much from "Citizen" Larry Wells of late, but the infamous bigfoot expert turned birther nutcase is all over claims from conspiracy nut job Wayne Allyn Root that supposedly "confirms" all the birther claims AND gives them all a pony to boot!
"And I thought I knew most everyone at Columbia. I certainly thought I’d heard of all of my fellow Political Science majors. But not Obama (or as he was known then- Barry Soetoro). I never met him. Never saw him. Never even heard of him. And none of the classmates that I knew at Columbia has ever met him, saw him, or heard of him.
But don’t take my word for it. The Wall Street Journal reported in 2008 that Fox News randomly called 400 of our Columbia classmates and never found one who had ever met Obama."
"As literally true as these statements might be, they don't prove that Barack Obama never attended Columbia — at best they demonstrate there was nothing particularly remarkable or distinguished about him at that point in his life that others found memorable 25 years after the fact. Barack Obama himself would likely agree with that assessment, as he noted himself that he spent his time at Columbia largely alone and isolated:
"Although Barack Obama may not have been particularly social or memorable during his years at Columbia, it isn't true that "no one ever came forward from Obama's past saying they knew him, attended school with him, was his friend, etc." Those who have attested to having daily personal experience with him during his time at that school include:*Friend and roommate Sohale Siddiqi, whom the Associated Press located and interviewed in May 2008.
*Roommate Phil Boerner, who provided his recollections of sharing a New York City apartment with classmate Barack Obama to the Columbia College Today alumni publication and the New York Times in early 2009.
*Michael L. Baron, who taught the year-long honors seminar in American Foreign Policy that Barack Obama took during his senior year at Columbia and recalled in an NBC interview Obama's "easily acing" the class and receiving an A for his senior paper on the topic of nuclear negotiations with the Soviet Union.
Likewise, other external evidence documents Barack Obama's presence at Columbia from 1981-83, including:*An article by Barack Obama published in the 10 March 1983 edition of Columbia's Sundial school magazine.
*A January 2005 Columbia College Today profile of Barack Obama as a Columbia alumnus.
*A Columbia College press release from November 2008 identifying him as "the first College alumnus to be elected President of the United States."
Not that facts matter much to Wayne Allyn Root.
"So here’s my gut. I believe Obama got a leg up by being admitted to both Occidental and Columbia as a foreign exchange student. He was raised as a young boy in Indonesia. Did his mother ever change him back to a U.S. citizen? I’m betting not. He was abandoned by his mother and sent back to Hawaii to live with his grandparents. No one was paying much attention to young Obama, so his citizenship was never changed back. But suddenly as he nears college-age Obama learns that foreign students have a much easier path being admitted to U.S. universities. And even more amazingly, they get loads of aid and scholarships to attend college for free- something unavailable to U.S. citizens.
So a plan is hatched. Obama uses his Indonesian passport and citizenship to get into college. Suddenly even Ivy League Columbia University is a possibility- for a foreign student from Indonesia. And it’s all paid for by the taxpayers.
That would explain how a poor student who rarely attended class and got mediocre grades, and with no money, was able to get accepted and pay for Occidental, Columbia and Harvard Law. The door magically opened for a foreign student with an exotic background.”
Wow. Dog whistle much??
8 August - And it looks like Reality Check noticed the little "oops" Corsi did with the comment about "evidence that's being created".
"Why would Jerome Corsi use that particular phrase? Why not “the evidence that is being collected” or “the evidence that is being gathered”? It just may be that Corsi slipped up and was actually honest for a brief moment. We know that the Cold Case Posse has engaged in presenting fraudulent evidence. During the the July 17 press conference Mike Zullo claimed to show that the code for Barack Obama’s father’s race that was penciled in by the Hawaii Department of Health next to “African” in the race box was a code for “missing or not given” according to the manual used for coding by the National Center for Vital Statistics in 1961. Now that the tape guide and the coding manual for 1961 have been obtained we know that this was a fib and that the tables presented were from 1968 and 1969. In 1961 the code for “9” in the race box meant “other non-white”. We also know that the claim repeated by Corsi in this video that African was not a valid selection for race in 1961 is false. The 1961 coding manual explains how “African American” is to be coded. For more details on the Birther myth concerning “African” as a racial designation see this article by Dr. Conspiracy, The African Race: the final chapter.
Corsi also makes the false claim in the video that “the Obots are asking for all sorts of documents”. Actually, what Doctor Conspiracy, John Woodman, and RC Radio have asked to see is exactly one document, 1961 NCVS manual that Mike Zullo claimed the CCP had in their possession and had obtained after months of searching. Also, it is not just “Obots” who have asked for this document. Posters and Free Republic and Birther blogger “lady forest” at her blog my very own point of view have called on Corsi and the CCP to produce their copy of the coding manual. This latest video from Corsi is apparently his feeble attempt to answer those demands."
8 August - And we once again have the birtherstani version of the Dr. Bronner's soap label:
Great Video & Article!! Obama Release Your Records!!
Greta is play-acting the role of being a dummy mannequin T.V announcer dummy - when she is a shrewd, very well educated SHARP HAWK lawyer.
Listening to her lie on T.V. acting like she doesn't know what is going on to save her job is sickening!!!
Do you think she loves America? How can she get up in the morning and face herself?
Greta is being used by Satan the Father of Evil & The Father of Lie as she blindly refuses to say THE OBVIOUS TRUTH ABOUT OBAMA WHICH IS OBVIOUS BY NOW WITH ALL OF HIS SEALED RECORDS & LITERALLY THAT 100% ALL OF HIS PERSONAL USA ID. DOCUMENTS ARE ALL INVESTIGATED AND FOUND TO HAVE LEGAL PROBABLE CAUSE ON THEM THAT LITERALLY ALL OF OBAMA'S PERSONAL USA I.D. DOCUMENTS ARE ILLEGAL FRAUDULENT FAKES!!
DOCUMENTS & FAKES!!
There she is being a shrewd & sharp individual play-acting IN AN OBVIOUS TRANSPARENT POOR ACTING MODE that she is totally dumb and stupid asking Mr. Trump why he wants to see Obama's sealed records…. on her show.
Can she be any more stupid?!
This is the United State of American - president's job that represents over 311 + million USA American citizen's!!
To Greata, the dollar bill and her career are more important to her than the USA and much more important than protecting the lives of 311 + million USA American citizen's from the CURRENT 100% FOREIGN INDONESIAN CITIZEN, OUTRAGEOUS, DAILY SERIAL CRIMINAL USURPER, THE 100% LEGALLY UNDOCUMENTED ILLEGAL ALIEN, SOEBARKAH - SOETORO AKA OBAMA!!
SOEBARKAH AKA OBAMA IS A 100% FOREIGN & DOMESTIC ENEMY TERRORIST DESTROYER OF THE USA!!!
SOEBARKAH AKA OBAMA IS A SUNNI MUSLIM SAUDI ARABIA FINANCED FOR OVER 15 YEARS RADICAL REVOLUTIONARY SUNNI ISLAMIST MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD MEMBER AND A RADICAL REVOLUTIONARY COMMUNIST INFILTRATOR, HIRED DESTROYER OF THE USA, DOMESTIC TERRORIST WAGING A JIHAD ON THE USA FROM INSIDE OF THE USA TO OVERTHROW THE USA!!
WE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE TO GET HIM ARRESTED SO WE CAN GET HIS SERIAL HIGH CRIMES SPREE STOPPED SO HE WILL BE STOPPED FROM BEING ABLE TO COMMIT ANY MORE HIGH CRIMES AND FELONIES, FRAUDS AND HIGH TREASON'S IN THE USA AGAINST US IN HIS QUEST TO OVERTHROW AND TO DESTROY THE USA!!
Fuck you Greta for NOT standing up and for not speaking out & for NOT Protecting We The American People, from the 100% foreign Indonesian citizen, 100% Daily Serial Criminal, Domestic Terrorist, Sunni Islamist Muslim Brotherhood Member, Gay Communist Usurper "Obama"!!!
August 8, 2012 12:15 PM"
8 August - Gordon Epperly responds to the request for removal to US District court.
(Scribd link here)
He starts off with objecting to the US attorney for the Federal Judicial District of Alaska. Why?? Three guesses…
"The Assistant U.S. Attorney acts in the name of the United States Attorney. The U.S. Attorney for the Federal Judicial District of Alaska is Karen L Loeffler"
Could it be??
"The first Woman to be appointed into a "Pubic Office" of the United States Department of Law was "Janet Wood Reno." Ms. Reno was appointed into Offtce by former President, Bill Clinton, on February 11, 1993, and confirmed on March 11, 1993. As no one questioned the appointment, the trespass upon the U.S. Constitution escalated with [President] Barack Obama appointing the first Woman to the Office of U.S. Attorney, Barbara L. McQuade with her term as U.S. Attorney starting on January 4, 2010. [President] Barack Obama has appointed several Woman into the "Office" of "US. Attorney" without any Constitutional authority. What took place within the U.S. Constitution in the year of 1993 that allow former President, Bill Clinton, to appoint Woman to Offtces of the United States government? ABSOLUTLY NOTHING - What was unconstitutional before the year of 1993 is unconstitutional today."
Yes indeed. Epperly is claiming that the US Attorney doesn't have authority in this case because she's a woman.
One gets the feeling that Mr. Epperly's love life is confined to livestock and the occasional desperate moose in the area….
"The year 2010 national elections for the government of the United States have come and gone with several Woman, and other individuals who are not white Citizens, having been elected or appointed into the Offices of the Congress, President, Judicial Courts, and several Executive Offtces of the government for the United States of America. All these individuals are "Usurpers of Office" for they have no "Political Privileges" (Rights) under any provision of the United States Constitution to hold a Pubic Offtce for the United States government under the qualification Clauses of Article I, Article II, and Article III of the United States Construction."
I have to give Mr. Epperly credit though. At least he's an open racist, unlike many other birthers.
"There have been 38 Woman in the United States Senate since the establishment of that body in 1789. The first Woman served in 1922, but Woman were first elected in number in 1992. Today, 17 of the 100 U.S. Senators are Woman. Thirteen of the Woman who have served were appointed; seven of those were appointed to succeed their deceased husbands. The first Woman in the Senate was Rebecca Latimer Felton who served for only one day in 1922. Hattie Caraway became the first Woman to win election to the Senate, in 1932. No Woman served from 1922 to 1931, 1945 to 1947, and 1973 to 1978. Since 1978, there has always been at least one Woman in the Senate.
As Congress has never granted Woman the Political Privilege to hold Pubic Offices of the United States by proposing and adopting Constitutional Amendments, Women do not qualify as Citizens of the United States with "Political Privileges" under Article I of the U.S. Constitution. Woman Members of the U.S. Congress, are usurpers of Office."
One gets the image of Mr. Epperly railing at the walls of his house, decrying the day that uppity women actually started wearing pants in public and demanding the right to think for themselves. Really! Who do these dames think they are anyway?? (/sarcasm)
"As Congress has never granted Woman nor any non-white Citizens the "Political Privilege" of holding Pubic Offices of the United States, there is no authority for Woman to hold the Office of Justice of the Supreme Court nor a Judge of an inferior Court of the United States. The U.S. Constitution at Article I, Section 6, Clause 2 makes it clear with the combination of the words "his" and "any Office" in the phrase "no Person holding any Office under the United States; shall be a Member of either House during his Continuance in Office" that Woman were not to be qualified for the Office of a Judicial Officer of the Federal Judiciary nor hold any Cabinet Office of the Executive Branch of Government which includes United States Attorney General and United States Attorney."
As legal arguments go, claiming "I have a penis and you don't so you don't have authority over me" is pretty weak and silly.
"Barack Obama is of Negro descent (Mulatto) and before the Civil War of 1865, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Negroes have no Rights, Civil or Political, as they were not Citizens of the United States. /24"
"24 / Dred Scott v. Sanford, 60 U.S. 393 (1856)"
What a surprise, he's citing the Dred Scott decision. Birthers sure do love them that decision now….
Actually under the law at that time, Barack Obama would have "partaken of the status of his mother", and been considered white.
"At the time the U.S. Constitution was written and up until the time of the Civil War, Negroes were considered to be nothing more than ''property."
One gets the idea that Mr. Epperly misses the good ol' days…..
"The Republicans of the northern States sitting in Congress made an attempt to change the status of the Negro by proposing three (3) Constitutional Amendments, the Thirteenth, which freed the Negroes from slavery, the Fourteenth, which granted the Negroes the "Privileges" and "Immunities" of citizenship (Civil Rights) that may be bestowed upon them by Acts of Congress, and the Fifteenth, which granted the Negroes the "Political Privileges" ofVoting.
None of the Civil War Amendments granted any none white Citizen of the United States the "Political Privilege" to hold Pubic Offices within the United States government. The term "Citizen" (as used in Article I and Article II of the Constitution for the United States of America) does not include "Political Privileges" to hold Pubic Office"for those who are not white Citizens nor for those who are Woman.
"Pubic Office"? Epperly has some serious issues with people's skin colour AND plumbing.
And it's funny I don't remember those amendments being written to allow people the right to vote for the white male of their choice.
Oh look. Good old fashioned paranoia.
"Those who may be defined as "Domestic Enemies" have taken foothold in the government of the United States and they are determined to destroy the United States from within. We realize that these individuals have identified themselves as "Progressives" or as "Liberals" to cover up their true identities and they have no respect for Constitutions of a Country. They represent secret governments which operate in the dark of legitimate governments. This is nothing new and it is common knowledge. /25"
And what is footnote 25?:
"25/ The "Illuminati" is represented in the United States by the "Council on Foreign Relations" and the "Tri-Lateral Commission." There are other Organizations of the Illuminati that are working hand in hand (e.g. "ACLU," "Freemasons," "NAACP," ''Zionist" and others.)."
What a surprise, he's anti-semitic as well!!!
"Under the cover of being "Politically Correct," these "Domestic Enemies" have inserted Woman and none white Citizens into Pubic Offices of the United States government in hopes that everyone would be distracted and be looking some other direction other than at them and hoping their Plans to infiltrate and destroy the United States of America would never be discovered. It would appear that they have been successful over the years, nevertheless, their crimes of Sedition" have not gone unnoticed."
"Help! My government has uppity dames and darkies! They scare me! WAHHHHHHH!!"
Then he gets all threaty: (bold face mine)
"The present day government of the United States is no longer operating as a de jure lawful government of the People nor for the governments of the States of the Union. The government of the United States can only be classified as an unlawful de facto government to which no-one owes any duty or Allegiance
If a de jure Congress of the United States of America finds that there is a need for Woman and those who are not white Citizens of the United States of America to have "Political Privileges" of holding Pubic Offices of the United States government, the Congress has the authority under Article V of the U.S. Constitution to propose Amendments and if the Legislatures of the States of the Union are in agreement, they may ratify the Amendments.
Under the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776; the People are under a mandate to remove themselves from under the "Rule" of a de facto government. If those who are participating in the "Sedition" of the Constitution of the United States of America do not remove themselves from Pubic Office of the United States government, the People have every Right to remove those individuals from Office by whatever means it may take."
Yeah, I think the court may take some extra-special note of that one….
"Karen L Loeffler is not a lawful United States Attorney. She has no authority under any provision of the U.S. Constitution to hold the Office of United States Attorney and no lawful authority to make appearances in any Court of Law on behalf of the United States or any Officer thereof. When she misrepresents herself as an United States Attorney, she defrauds the Courts, not only the Courts of the United States, but the Courts of the States of the Union as well. When she makes pretended appearances before the U.S. District Court claiming non-existent authority to transfer "Proceedings" of a Court of a State of the Union into the United States District Court, she trespasses upon the "Sovereign Authority" of a State to conduct "Courts of Judicial Review" of "Administrative Records" and did trespassed upon the "Rights" of the "Complainant" of an "Administrative Complaint" to "Petition" a "Superior Court" of a State for "Orders" in the nature of ' Writ of Mandamus" to be issued upon Employees and Officers of a State of the Union for the purpose of performing "Ministerial Duties" of Office.
In conclusion, a demand is made upon all to restore the "Proceedings" of "Judicial Review" of the "Administrative Record'' of Gordon Warren Epperly back into the Superior Court for the State of Alaska at Juneau, Alaska."
Somehow, I don't think that "you have to do what I say because I have a willie and the US attorney doesn't" will carry much weight in a court of law.