And the big news going into the New Year is Dr. Orly in a serious manic phase, sending as much crap to the court as humanely possible. And she seems to have reacted to the US Attorney noting her subpoenas aren't valid and haven't been properly served by doubling and tripling down, demanding a myriad of government officials drop everything and run out at once to her courtroom with every single thing she desires from them. And a pony.
As for the rest of birtherstan, Gabe Zolna continues to crank out the loony videos. Fitzpatrick fanboi Michael Lerman has a mad at the Orange County (CA) Board of Supervisors for not doing his bidding. Larry Klayman comes up with a brand new legal case to cite in Florida, or at least it would have been new if the defense hadn't already cited it. The "North American Law Center" follows birther tradition in sending out a whiney, demanding letter.
Larry Klayman whines at World Nut Daily, while WND's writer Erik Rush shows some serious looney tunes. "Birther Report" continues it's downward spiral. And Sibley gets a response from the defense on his dingbat cases.
25 December - Gabe Zolna is a freaking drama llama.
He's got an annoying smirk, doesn't he??
It's interesting that he slips up and first discusses flying "The Stars and Bars". Only "Stars and Bars" I know about were never the flag of the UNITED States of America. Only that "Other" States of America.
Oh, and he still has the wet dream of seeing President Obama dragged out of the White House in "handcuffs and a waist chain". Hmmm.....Confederate imagery and a desire to see an African-American man shackled. Some interesting bees in Ol' Gabe's bonnet.
25 December - Yeah, I'd dare say Gabe Zolna has some issues.
He seems to be annoyed at those in Congress of the Jewish faith. The way he pronounces "Jews" is interesting...... But what really gets interesting is at about 0:50.
0:50 - "You'd think that, whither or not they're Democrats, you'd think that they would respect their heritage. And you'd think that they'd want to protect their country, you know, I'm talking like Israel."
Funny, I rather though someone was elected to Congress because the country they cared about was the United States. I find his suggestion that Israel is somehow more "their country" than the United States rather insulting and racist.
It then devolves into a rant about why he can't understand why "the Jews" would vote and support an "Arab Muslim" who "hates the Jews". Not to mention that Obama holds "all those Ramadan dinners at the White House" (Funny, I doubt that he objected to GW Bush hosting Ramadan dinners at the White House during HIS time in office) Which segues into Sen. Feinstein and Sen. Boxer attending "those Ramadan dinners", because…
2:30 - "…see, because they don't really care about their country. They don't care about their heritage, Matter of fact, there's not a Jew that voted for him that could care about his country or his heritage, or they wouldn't have voted for him. Now think about it. Now apparently, according to the Bible, God said that like the Jews were the chosen ones. Well, if that's true, why have they all turned against the Jews?"
Oh, and he thinks Sen. Al Franken stole his senatorial election. And the legal system doesn't work because if it worked even a tiny bit, President Obama would have been in prison "a long time ago".
25 December - Add Gabe Zolna to the list of people who think that Frank Marshall Davis was President Obama's "real father".
26 December - Remember around 4 December, when Walter Fitzpatrick fanboy and "people's ombudsman" Michael Lerman tried to serve the Orange County (CA) Board of Supervisors?? The one that had the video where the county attorney can clearly be heard saying "this is not service", much to Lerman's annoyance?
Well, he's grumpy that the Board of Supervisors hasn't followed his demands. In a badly corrupted Word file at Arnie Rosner's blog, he whines:
(Scribd version here)
"On December 4, 2012 in an open public meeting of the Orange County Board of Supervisors, you were informed by me of the contents of the attached Writ of Mandamus and Quo Warranto Notice with a sample of evidentiary exhibits attached regarding proof o fthe ineligibility of Barrack Obama et al for President for lawful cause, i.e. forgery, crimes, and treason and previous, uncontested citizens' grand jury indictments. You were each given lawful notice both verbally and in writing by me that day and were given ten days to notify the California Electors that Obama et al was not to be certified or voted for until the matter of his eligibility for office is lawfully resolved either by Congress or an acceptable, clean hands court of record of competent jurisdiction."
Just because you sneer at the country attorney claiming it's service, doesn't mean it's legal and proper service.
"This notice informed you that if you failed to heed the writs and the lawful demands and notices made under those writs brought into your chambers by me to command you to do your lawful duty under your oath and bond and make the electors knowledgeable about Mr. Obama et al's crimes and ineligibility, then you will have vacated your office pursuant to the law and may face criminal prosecution and other liabilities for aiding and abetting treason and RICO charges.
Since you received this notice by my personal service to you in chambers you are responsible for heeding its contents pursuant to the law. The crime of misprision of treason is a very serious matter."
Nice and threatening.
"I and many of my fellow citizens believe that our nation is in mortal and imminent danger of an all out war, a war brought about by Mr. Obama's criminal acts."
Problem for him is that Presidenting While Black isn't a criminal act.
"County Counsel attempted to block the delivery of this important, life saving communication. He will be held fully liable for RICO and treason, and other crimes should our nation come under harm and attack, from his negligent inappropriate actions and breach of his oath of office that day."
In other words, "how DARE you do your job and follow the law! Don't you know there's a scary black man in the White House!!' TREASON!!!"
"You are noticed that you had and have a lawful duty which is now deemed to have not been honored and fulfilled because Electors have now voted for Obama et al (see the attached news evidence) and this matter was not made known to the Electors, Secretary of State or the Governor as lawfully demanded by me pursuant to your oath of office and Obama's certification was not held in abatement until adjudicated.
If this does not occur by Dee 31, 2012 then this matter will be officially reported as a crime and those who are complicit will be brought up on criminal charges for misprision of treason and other crimes with the appropriate authorities."
Let me guess. You and Rosner are going to have your own little trial at Denny's, and find the Board of Supervisors guilty between the coffee and the arrival of your Grand Slams, right??
"You will tender written evidence of your compliance to this lawful demand and evidence of your intent to cure to the above address, care of my office, as an offer of proof that you are attempting to reverse the crimes committed by you and the Electors, and the state of California et al for their unlawful certification of Obama et al and notice the Secretary of State of California, the Governor and the Sheriff of Orange County of Obama et al's special ineligibility condition and their lawful duty to require a stand down of his election certification as per the Writ of Mandamus notice and pursuant to the law."
I'm sure they'll get around to it after they have the magical sparkle ponies show up in chambers and fart rainbows and glitter all over the place.
"You will denote each Elector's name and contact address who you have contacted and informed of this demand and action and reply back to this correspondence by Dee 31, 2012 after receipt of this notice that you have done so."
Why do I get the feeling that his mailbox remained as empty as his thoughts?
"A non reply will indicate your perjury of oath for willful failure to uphold the Constitution and failure to notify and act to stop a war harm from occurring to we the people pursuant to the writ and will indicate a breach /perjury of your Oath and fiduciary duty for dishonest services fraud and I will put on record your willful act as your complicity to aid and abet the crimes of Obama et al for treason, perjury of oath and RICO."
You know, there is a part of California's legal codes that does cover his demands….
31 December - In Voeltz v Obama v3.0, short, sweet, and to the point.
(Scribd link here)
"THE SECRETARY AND CANVASSING COMMISSION’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S EXPEDITED MOTION FOR REHEARING
Defendants, Florida Secretary of State Kenneth W. Detzner (“Secretary”) and Florida Elections Canvassing Commission (“Canvassing Commission”), state that Plaintiff’s Expedited Motion for Rehearing should be denied for the reasons set forth in Defendant Barack Obama’s Response filed on December 26, 2012 and incorporated herein."
31 December - In Voeltz v Obama v3.0, long, whiney, and irrevelant.
(Scribd link here)
"Plaintiff is available January 2 or 3, 2013 for a telephonic status conference to set the date for a specially set evidentiary hearing on the merits, as the law is now clear that one is required and that the prior dismissal order should be immediately vacated and set aside, as it was legally in error. Late Friday, on December 29, 2012, the court’s scheduling clerk advised that this telephonic status conference could be held on Thursday, January 3, 2013; however Plaintiff respectfully requests an earlier date of January 2, 2013 as time is of the essence."
I'm sure Klayman is sitting by his phone waiting for the judge to call……
As for the "new evidence" he sites, it's not very new at all. Defense cited it on 12 December 2012 as a reason to dismiss the case.
31 December - Stephen Pidgeon's "North American Law Center" issues an "Important Notice" to the Congress and Senate that they better not certify the election results for that scary black man, or else.
"BE ADVISED, your Oath of office requires you to act in a manner which upholds the United States Constitution, our State Constitutions, and the Rule of Law. This shall serve as Notice to you of the massive fraud which has occurred in the 2012 election. As a public servant, your highest duty is to the people of the United States. Failing to do your duty, after having been so noticed, will be a direct violation of your Oath, with malice aforethought."
Funny, I can't think of anything in the Oath of Office that requires a Senator or Member of Congress to do the bidding of a batch of delusional conspiracy creeps.
"The evidence is overwhelming that the 2012 President elect Barack Hussein Obama is not a natural-born citizen of the United States, as defined by The Law of Nations – Book 1 – Chapter 19 – Sections 212, 213, 214 and 215 – or the United States Supreme Court in Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874) and U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898). Since the Supreme Court in Minor directly construed in the Article 2, Section 1, natural-born citizen clause to determine the citizenship status of the petitioner, the Court’s definition of the natural-born citizen class is binding precedent."
Translation - "Here's a bunch of made up stuff that has been rejected by every courtroom it's appeared in, but we DEMAND you take it seriously, or else!!"
"In addition, there is significant evidence of election fraud throughout the 2012 election process, rendering the alleged outcome of the election null and void until such time that a full investigation can be carried out."
On other words, "Wahhh! The White guy didn't win!!!"
"Secretaries of the numerous states were duly NOTICED prior to placing the name Barack Hussein Obama on the 2012 ballot."
"Wahhh! A scary black man was on the ballot!! WAHHHHH!"
"Please govern your actions accordingly.
Ms. Barbara Ketay
The North American Law Center
P.O. Box 783 – Hermitage, TN 37076-0783"
Okay, this is odd. Barbara Ketay was the domain register and President of the SovCit-friendly "U.S,. Bar Association" in Florida. She has a resume at the "Restoring America Network". She's also the host of the "Liberty and You" morning radio show heard in Brockport/Rochester, New York. And she's also the Chair of the "United States Patriot Union Justice Division" (She gave a rather interesting speech on Veterans Day 2011, when the US Patriots Union had a sparsely-attended rally demeaning President Obama's immediate resignation)
She had two and a half years at Chase Law School, and then a paralegal correspondence course though Blackstone School of Law.
So why on earth does a Tennessee-based "Law Center" have a Washington State attorney as their legal team?? Surely they could find someone crazy enough in Tennessee?
31 December - At World Nut Daily, Larry Klayman goes into an extended whine that wahh, the courts haven't removed that scary black man, wahhh."
"Barack Hussein Obama is “eligible” for only one thing: to deceive the American people and the world community into believing he is a legitimate president of the United States."
Yeah, funny how he's also deceived the US Constitution and US law as well.
"In practice, that is according to all of the judges who thus far have ruled in lawsuits concerning his lack of legal status under the U.S. Constitution as a “natural born citizen.”
Yeah, how DARE they stick to established law, the US Legal code, and US law!
"As you know, to qualify for the office of president, the law, plain and simple, requires that a person be born in the United States or one of its territories, to two American citizen parents."
And yet, after four years of making this claim, absolutely no birther can point out where in the US Constitution OR the US legal code it says such. All they can do is claim the Constitution is based on an English translation of a Swiss legal treatise that post-dates the Constitution.
"I was starkly reminded why the framers of the U.S. Constitution inserted this special requirement for the highest offices in the land – president and vice president – into our body politic. This was because there were those persons around them, such as John Dickinson, the colonial delegate and a Tory from Pennsylvania, who to the end advocated against independence from King George III and had remained loyal to the British crown, even when it was clear that the crown was no longer “loyal” to the colonies."
Klayman needs to check his history. John Dickinson (also called the "Penman of the Revolution") felt his objection was to Parliament and not the Crown. Even though he refused to sign the Declaration of Independence, he DID become part of the Pennsylvania militia, where he held the rank of Brigadier General and lead over 10,000 troops. Later he served as a delegate from Delaware, President of the Delaware State Senate, President of the Pennsylvania State Senate, and served on the Constitutional Convention of 1786.
"These types of individuals clearly were a risk to the new nation."
What, well read honorable gentlemen who tried to exhaust all avenues of appeal left before changing their allegiances and honorably serving their country during it's founding?? Oh, woe is us that we would suffer such men!
"Thus, all foreign influences were designed to be removed in the future from even getting close to the presidency."
This from the same man who thinks the entire US Constitution was based on a Swiss legal book written in French.
"By contrast to Barack Hussein Obama, whose Kenyan British-subject father was not only anti-American, but a vehement anti-Semite, anti-Christian Muslim Marxist, John Dickinson was an icon of virtue."
Wow. There's an entire kennel howling at that many dog whistles.
"In the face of clear-cut law, the judges in the various states where eligibility challenges have been filed have dodged and weaved to avoid finding Obama ineligible – or, for that matter, even allow for a full evidentiary hearing on the issue."
That's because, in the face of clear-cut law, they've FOLLOWED clear-cut law. As for a hearing, there's been two now, one of which had evidence presented unchallenged - and it was found non-credible.
"In a recently filed case in Florida, which I timely filed for Democrat Michael Voeltz, following Obama’s latest fraudulent caper in the Nov. 6, 2012, presidential election..,"
That would be the case where you filed the same swill you filed in two OTHER, dismissed cases in Florida.
"…the Leon County Circuit Court judge, the Honorable (sic) Kevin Carroll, even said as much in his week-old, two and a half page, hastily written order dismissing the case – where he made reference to his former Circuit Court “judicial buddy” having been recently nominated and sworn in by Obama as a federal court judge to preside in a courthouse down the street. Carroll obviously hopes that his largesse toward Obama will someday similarly reward him with a federal judgeship as well."
Because accusing the judge of corruption ALWAYS goes well for the plaintiff.
"As of last Friday, despite the urgency of resolving Voeltz’s presidential election challenge, Judge Carroll was still sitting on our motion for rehearing, despite our renewed emergency request to grant us a hearing, vacate his dismissal order and allow my client Voeltz due process of law."
Translation - "Wahhh! That big ol' nasty judge is still a poppyhead who won't do what what I tell him to do!!"
"According to his assistant, with whom I spoke late that day, the judge was indeed in his office all week, perhaps now hiding under his desk for cover."
Can we have contempt charges now please??
"Unfortunately for Judge Carroll, it’s only a matter of time when he can no longer run and hide from the law or, if that doesn’t work, the wrath of those patriotic Americans who will call him to legal account in an appropriate, peaceful way."
Oooh, nice threat, with a cute little CYA comment at the end to try to make it look like you're not ACTIVELY threatening the judge.
Except then you follow it with:
"The time for revolution is upon us, and Judge Carroll’s and his colleagues’ deceitful if not traitorous actions remind us why our Founding Fathers and, ironically, their “sunshine patriots” were also forced to take action when the “legal system” of King George III continued to feather its own nest at the expense of the people and behaved similarly."
Nothing like threatening the judge AND demanding a civil war unless you get your way.
And in comments:
" Dawg_em • 12 hours ago
There is a great need for citizen grand juries and the appropriate trials to bring justice to the land. Unfortunately, too many Americans are too stupid or distracted to care. It's up to those of us who are awake to give them a shake and snap them out of it."
2009 called, they want their stupid ideas back.
1 January - We already knew that World Nut Daily writer Erik Rush wasn't exactly sane. The fact he hangs around Martha Trowbridge is evidence of that.
But thanks to Right Wing Watch, we have a bit more evidence of his lack of sanity, not to mention his love of the Constitution and regard to his fellow citizens.
(Bold face mine)
"It is improbable that the framers of the Constitution anticipated a situation in which the press were entirely given over to seditious, anti-American policies. If they had, it is likely that their modus operandi would be similar to that for any faction found guilty of high crimes. Trials for treason and the requisite sentences would apply, and I would have no qualms about seeing such sentences executed, no matter how severe."
So much for that pesky First Amendment. Except, in Erik Rush's mind, the First Amendment only applies towards CONSERVATIVE free speech.
"Those whose speech and actions impinge upon the God-given rights set forth in the Declaration of Independence and codified in the Constitution are, by definition, excepted from protection under the First Amendment (as well as the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment). This is a very important concept to consider, because it is based on these presumptions of protected speech and equal protection for all that progressives and socialists have engaged in their predation upon our liberties.
If these truths can be acknowledged and widely accepted as such (as opposed to progressives’ Orwellian interpretations), then the political disenfranchisement of liberals, progressives, socialists and Marxists can begin in earnest, and in the open."
What is it about birthers and people like Erik Rush?? They claim to be such stanch, freedom-loving Americans, and then they turn around and demand restrictions of the freedom of speech, disenfranchment of political opposition, and the restriction of civil and personal liberties for people they don't agree with. Not to mention demanding "guilty until proven guilty" star chamber court trials in which only their evidence is allowed to be presented and the accused isn't even allowed the courtesy of an attorney.
Their idea of the United States of American has more than a slight resemblance to Stalinist Russia. Or Germany in the mid to late 1930's.
"It is of the utmost importance that Americans become aware of the dedicated efforts that are being made to transform us from citizens into subjects, and that we are already at war. This is a war we have not seen the likes of previously and that will challenge notions of war for centuries to come. Even if we did not have the Second Amendment to stand on, I would still support gun rights, because guns are not the issue – power is. Next will come edged weapons control, then blunt weapons control, then compulsory periodic assessments of citizens by government psychologists.
There are millions of Americans for whom “it can’t happen here” has been well-inculcated into their worldview; these have been conditioned to operate at the basest of intellectual levels. They are also the ones who will blindly obey any laws enacted by government, whether these imperceptibly erode their liberties, or require their reporting neighbors to secret police.
There are also Americans – some misguided, some ideologues – who work every day of the week in the cause of compromising our liberties. They are just as dangerous and criminal as those who would stifle any of the liberties contained in the Bill of Rights.
I suppose suggesting that we shoot them wouldn’t be taken very well – although that is precisely what it came down to 236 years ago."
Yes, you see a World Nut Daily writer openly calling for his fellow citizens to be shot out of hand if they don't agree with him about firearms.
Says something about the quality of their "journalism", doesn't it?
1 January - Birther Report rides Klayman's coattails. Again.
" hawk · 7 hours ago
Four years ago, I personally called the Supreme Court & spoke with a female agent named Ms. Giaccio - informed her millions of Americans were backing Taitz's investigation into a National Security Breach of BHO(muslim foreigner) - told her the Supreme court MUST abide by the people's constitution or risk a possible uprising from 250 million EXTREMELY ANGRY US CITIZENS…………here we are 4 years later & report SCJ roberts has a billion dollar account in the Vatican bank vault…………
we sent certified/return receipt signature to our regional FBI office - got NOT RESPONSE………..d.c. know everything before we hear it on the arab owned news…………….we called a boycott of Fox & all T.V. news stations……….there are still a few million sheeple who could care less our country is being destroyed………………we the people care. God bless America!"
Yeah, about that "uprising from 250 million EXTREMELY ANGRY US CITIZENS". What happened to it??
" hawk · 3 hours ago
Does anybody think this imposter is going to stand down now that communists easily handed him a powerful position? No. Anybody who expects that hasn't fought hard these last 4 years.
Communists threatened everybody who dared question this imposter with job loss - media had "screeners" answer phones to shut us down the last 4 years……….communists knew Americans would NEVER agree to a dictatorship, hence the racist BS……
FORGET the SCOTUS they have been bought off - they turned their backs on our constitution - Kagan/Sotomayer MUST be removed - obama cannot legally appoint ANYBODY - HE IS ILLEGALLY occupying our White House.
It is not about d.c. ignoring us these last 4 years - AMERICANS HAVE A DUTY TO PROTECT OUR CONSTITUTION! It is in our blood. BLOOD & SOIL! obama will NEVER understand that concept - he is a foreigner!"
If you're going to use "Blood and Soil", at least use the original German.
1 January - I'm not going to say "Dealio" is chicken, but he might want to make sure he doesn't go near a Popeye's.
" Dealio · 33 minutes ago
The question is, when do we storm the capitol? If the tea party really, and/or truly exists, they need to immediately call for an encirclement of Washington. No one leaves. There is absolutely no point in allowing this to continue one moment longer. In other words, and/or in my mind, the jig is up."
So why haven't you??
2 January - Dr. Orly boasts about harassing people all over the world (malware and redirect warning)
"I paid someone, who is a licensed barrister in GB to get docs, he sent a freedom of information request similar to our FOIA, but did not get an answer. I personally visited one of the British consulates in Europe and spoke to an attache. She told me that when GB left colonies, they left all the documentation behind and did not make any copies. I believe she was lying, but there is nothing I can do about it at the moment."
I'm sure the attache was wondering "who the hell is this wanker??"
"Interesting detail is the fact that when Chris Strunk asked for records, his request was forwarded from the department of foreign service to the home service, from MI6 to MI5. If Obama was never a citizen,why would it happen."
Considering Christopher-Earl:Strunk babbles about a Islamo-Jesuit conspiracy to take over the world on behalf of the Vatican Illumanati, and that the current British Royal Family are allied with the Knights of Malta, I'd take his claims with a truckload or two of Mortons.
"I also visited one of the Kenyan embassies. The individual, who was replacing the cousul told me: where are you from? I told him. His response was; you are an American with your roots in Moldova, Obama is American with his roots in Kenya, let’s just leave it at that, I can’t get hospital records. He never denied that Obama was born in Kenya, he just said that he does not want to talk about it."
I'm willing to bet a) they never claimed he was born in Kenya either, and b) they were trying politely to blow off the crazy woman.
"At this point it does not matter any more. We have all the evidence we need."
"My mind is made up, don't confuse me with facts"
"The evidence of forgery is overwhelming. we need one judge who is not on the take to stop this biggest case of elections fraud, forgery and treason in the history of this nation."
Funny how two courts to date have said your "evidence" and "witnesses" are not credible or valid. Oh, right, you're still looking for that one judge stupid or bigoted enough to buy into your crap.
"I was told that some people are planning to be at the court house with signs. I don’t know for sure."
Oh, I'm sure that will go over well. May have tens of people there.
2 January - Defense files opposition to Sibley's demand for discovery.
(Scribd link here)
"Plaintiff has, from the commencement of this action, engaged in numerous vexatious efforts to obtain discovery, all in violation of the Federal Civil and the Superior Court Rules of Civil Procedure, and all in pursuit of a frivolous — and moot — case.
Almost as if to prove the Government’s point, Plaintiff has now filed two additional frivolous motions. The first, styled as an “Emergency Second Motion for Order to Release Privacy Act-Protected Records and Expedited Consideration Based Upon Prima Facie Evidence
of Destruction of Evidence Related to Obama’s Birth,” apparently seeks an order from the Court requiring the National Archives and Record Administration (“NARA”) to produce and release original I-9 arrival records for Honolulu, Hawaii from August 1961. Dkt. #12. The second, styled as “Plaintiff’s Second Verified Motion for Rule to Show Cause Why Barack Hussein Obama, II, Should Not Be Held in Contempt of Court,” re-hashes Plaintiff’s prior motion concerning Plaintiff’s misguided efforts to serve a subpoena on the President. Dkt. #16. Both of these motions should be denied and the subpoenas quashed."
They sound grumpy.
"First, as set forth previously, Plaintiff has engaged in discovery that demonstrates an intent to harass numerous institutions and individuals with ill-conceived discovery requests and premature motions, with little regard for the rules of procedure, much less for relevance and need"
They are grumpy.
"A stay is warranted because the discovery Plaintiff has sought so far is wholly frivolous, and there is reason to suspect that yet more improper attempts to seek discovery and other relief may be forthcoming. This harassment should be stopped."
Yes. Yes it should.
2 January - One gets the feeling that the judge is less than impressed with Dr. Orly. (Malware and redirect warning)
9:20 AM (10 minutes ago)
to me, edward.olsen, george.waters
Good morning again and thank you for your question. The Court will permit each side twenty minutes total to present their arguments, which includes any and all witnesses.
Stephanie Deutsch, Courtroom Deputy to Judge England
United States District Court
501 I Street, Suite 4-200
Sacramento, California 95814
Some of Dr. Orly's supporters are less than happy.
"Rod Riddle January 2nd, 2013 @ 9:46 am The biggest crime against America since its founding and this crackpot is only allowing you 20 min???!!!!!! This shows it’s another dog & pony show. If the guy was serious about getting the full story he would ask you how long you think it would take to present all evidence with expert witness testimony and atleast give you close to that guesstimated amount of time. He’s in on the cover up. I’ve already added his name to the list!"
2 January - Dr. Orly tries to get more time, and then throws a fit when the defense tells her they would object.
"UNBELIEVABLE AND OUTRAGEOUS! U.S. ATTORNEY, WHO IS SUPPOSED TO UPHOLD THE LAW AND STOP FORGERY, PARTICULARLY IN THE WH, IS STRONGLY OPPOSING MY REQUEST FOR MORE TIME FOR WITNESSES TO TESTIFY ABOUT EVIDENCE OF FORGERY IN OBAMA’S IDS. THEY WANT EVERYTHING QUICKLY COVERED UP. WE HAVE NOTHING OR NOBODY TO PROTECT US AGAINST THIS CHICAGO MAFIA
Posted on | January 2, 2013"
2 January - And since Dr. Orly posted Judge England's clerk's email address, Dr. Orly's cavity creeps have no problems harassing the clerk. Which Dr. Orly tacitly supports by reposting the emails on her blog (malware and redirect warning)
"Dear Stephanie, I am an older American & I am re-emerging (as in worn out) after almost 3 straight days of babysitting. I am tired and did not “keep up” with normal Internet news cycle.
I believe that I read this morning (1/2/13) on the Orlytaitzesq.com website that the Judge (England) decided to allow ONLY ( ONLY) 20 minutes for each side to present witnesses and evidence in the Grinols case. I know ALL people are keenly aware that Sheriff Joe Arpaio (he is a Constitutional elected law officer), has performed a year long in-depth criminal investigation into Mr. Obama including, but not limited to — the proven forgery of a birth certificate posted on the WH website in April 2011 ; the proven falsified / tampered with Selective Service card regards Obama ; the proven stolen SS # that Obama uses (it is a Connecticut number & Obama was never in Conn. at the time of issuance) ; it was stolen from a dead person – born in 1890 in Conn. – who died in Hawaii around 1975 (my estimate — others have submitted actual specific correct dates) with no known relatives; therefore, this stolen SS # was hanging there to be plucked, like an apple in the Garden of Eden. To be brief, Law enforcement officer has submitted MORE THAN PROBABLE CAUSE ( some call it absolute proof) of felonies , fraud, forgery, and more. Arpaio and M. Zullo have fully explained the findings of criminal conduct in very long videos / films, that are widely available in the public domain. Orly Taitz, I believe , has submitted these lengthy Arpaio videos to the court as evidence.
Question: Will the Joe Arpaio videos be fully considered by the judge ? (again – Arpaio is a constitutional law officer; the findings are compelling). The videos ( est.) run over an hour; they certainly exceed 20 minutes. I would hope the Judge reviews these public domain law enforcement findings in Chambers, and gives them full consideration.
…… Because there are many other witnesses that Mz Taitz can attempt to cover in 20 or 30 minutes, if the Arpaio findings are stipulated to as “official law enforcement work”.
Is this a question that you can answer to a measly, old, patriotic, tax-paying, God-fearing citizen. Or do I lack standing?? Please reply at your earliest convenience.
2 January - So with 20 minutes total, what does Dr. Orly plan to do?? (malware and redirect warning)
"JUST GOT WORD FROM THE CHAMBERS: JUDGE ENGLAND WILL ALLOW ME TO MAKE AN ORAL MOTION AT THE ONSET OF THE HEARING ASKING FOR MORE TIME FOR THE ARGUMENT AND WITNESSES, NO GUARANTEE THAT HE WILL ALLOW MORE TIME AS THE FEDS OPPOSE
Posted on | January 2, 2013"
In other words: "Let me fenish, let me feeeeennsh!!!!"
I suspect the answer will be "no".
2 January - Drunk and delusional is no way to run a revolt, son.
"Dealio · 3 hours ago
There are no courts. The judges are puppets. Pour a stiff one, start lacing up those boots, and head towards the capitol. We must show up in the millions. There is no other way. No other way. If that can't be had, and/or we're too fucking useless, well, then, we're fucked. The illegal and co. have sent us a message time and time again- come get us, if you dare. We have as much to gain, as we do to lose. I apologize for the profanity, but we don't have time to fuck around."
2 January - Looks like Dr. Orly's Florida witness is Paul Irey and he's NOT happy (malware and redirect warning)
When did you figure this out? I just finished pasting up the 13 exhibits on foam core. 15 minutes is not nearly enough … nor is it worth flying across the country and back for 15 minutes total time to testify. "
Oh wahh freaking wahhh.
And seriously, did you think for a second that Dr. Orly had any concern about your schedule or life or anything else?? Remember, in her mind, you're simply a tool and another courtroom prop, and SHE'S the star of the show.
"You probably have 2 hours and the attorneys are going to spent that time objecting to the hearing … simply because they don’t want the evidence presented. Why can’t you stop them? That’s what they did the last time."
As much as Dr. Orly would like to the be supreme authority and dictator in the courtroom, that's not how the US court system works.
" I spent over a week preparing for 15 minutes??? Sure … the less testimony the better … for the criminals avoiding conviction. I’m going to run everything that I can’t testify to on WND and say so. Judge did not want to hear it. Obama’s attorneys do not want to hear it. I was ready to prove the forgery about 15 different ways … but now we can say that the courts run us out before we can present the testimony … then the press censors it and the congress does nothing."
Wow. He's almost as much of an attention whore as Dr. Orly. And I'm sure the court will take seriously the ravings of a so-called "expert" who claimed the long form was a forgery BEFORE HE EVEN SAW IT! Somehow I doubt the foam-core science fair project will help much.
Maybe the judge can ask him for the name of the "Secret Service agent" who supposedly told him it was a fake
" I am getting out of this country where Mickey Mouse can run for president because there are no laws against it … and no one has “standing” to challenge treason."
Such a patriot you are Mr. Irey. Can't stand the idea that there's a black man as President and that almost nobody takes your paranoid conspiracy theories seriously, so you want to go somewhere else. Maybe Lawrence Sellin can help get you a job in Helsinki, Finland.
2 January - Looks like we have some more of Dr. Orly's freak show attendees tomorrow (malware and redirect warning)
And which courtroom props are attending? We already knew about Paul Irey, but we also get:
"2. Pamela Barnett U.S. army intelligence officer seeking to authenticate a FOIA response from the state department as was received by Chris Strunck (you have FOIA in exhibits)
3. possibly former senior officer of Scotland Yard elite unit of anti Communist Proliferation and anti organized crime Neil Sankey"
So a fake black former army captain (seeking to prove something provided by a VexLig and known nutcase) and an unlicensed private investigator.
This is going to be festive.