Dispatches From Birtherstan - 15-16 January 2013

In today's dispatches, I apologize right at the start for the fact I get more than bit cranky with this one. Anyway, the Western Center for "Journalism" manages to disprove their own claim. Boy Defective Mike Zullo appears at a tea party event and doesn't say much.

Dr. Orly is a lying, scumsucking, evil, nasty, piece of human filth who has absolutely no problems with encouraging others towards violence. She has absolutely no regard for this country, the Constituion, the rule of law, the court system, or even basic human decency.

There is a petition to ask the DoJ to seek sanctions and fees against birther lawsuits. Please sign it.

We have anti-semites at Dr. Kate's cesspool, and Dr. Orly has absolutely NO problems dozing up to them.

And finally Padawan Pauly comes back into birtherstan, and he's codified his "Sacred Sperm of Citizenship" theory into a lawsuit that combines breathtaking arrogance with mind-numbing incoherence and incredible levels of insanity.

14 January - The Western Center for "Journalism" seems to think that Dr. Orly's planned protest at the Inauguration is just a spiffy idea.

"Those who support Attorney Orly Taitz’s challenge to Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility to serve as President are being urged to protest peacefully at inauguration proceedings on January 21, (the MLK, Jr. holiday,) and in front of the Supreme Court itself on February 15th when Justices will decide the merits of the challenge. Those making this unnecessary plea seem to forget that conservatives are always peaceful, even when confronted with the most inexcusable of antics by the other side"

O RLY?? It seems so funny then that I keep seeing calls for violence, armed revolt, and bloody civil wars by your fellow birthers. Not to mention the death threats I routinely get from your "peaceful conservatives".

And in comments:

"ONTIME says:
January 14, 2013 at 1:56 pm

I hope a couple million show upto expose this Faker in the WH and throw his butt out in the street."

What was that about "peaceful conservatives" again??

"Solidspine says:
January 15, 2013 at 12:14 am

I can not comment about obama because I hate him,

he has made me hate all negros"

Racist much??

14 January - Dr. Orly is a scumsucking lying piece of filth. (malware and redirect warning, and I apologize for the language I'm about to use.)

"Not only Obama regime removed my petition after a 1,000 people signed it within hours, but [highlight]a group of Obama’s operatives[/highlight] created a petition asking to deport Attorney Orly Taitz for incivism. Here is a definition of incivism. . . . n. 1. Lack of civism; lack of patriotism or love to one’s country

In case Obama’s thugs do not understand it, let me explain it to them slow-ly, so even they can understand. The love for one’s country does not mean the love for a criminal usurping the highest position in the government of the country, while using forged IDs and a stolen Social Security number. The love for the country demands one to expose such criminal and send him to prison for the rest of his life for the biggest case of fraud and forgery in the history of this country"

Dear Dr. Orly:

May I kindly invite you to GET THE HELL OUT OF OUR COUNTRY YOU GODDAMN FUCKING SEDITIOUS BITCH!!!!!

No, seriously, GET THE HELL OUT.

This country has given you chances and opportunities you never had growing up. You came here, set up a dentistry practice and got a law degree. Your husband set up a successful software company. Your children are having educational chances and academic freedoms you could have only dreamed of growing up.

And just how do you repay this country back?

You spread lies and falsehoods about the President.
You claim voter fraud where there is none.
You claim the justice system is corrupt.
You claim the media is corrupt.
You claim the House and Senate is corrupt.
You encourage violence against elected officials.
You call for coups, revolts, and armed uprisings.
You preach sedition and treason.
In short, Ms. Dr. Orly Taitz, DDS, Esq, PDQ, XYZ, BBQ, you are NOT an American.

You don't act like one. You don't behave like one. You're a paranoid racist lying ball of filth. For four and a half years we've been treated to you taking a great big steaming dump on every single thing this country stands for and was founded on.

Lady Liberty?? Oh give me a fucking break. You're no more "Lady Liberty" than Mildred Gillars was, and you're about as much of a patriot as well. Every single word out of your mouth is an insult to 237 years of American History. You're so goddamn fond of comparing this President to Stalin, Lenin, Hitler, or the despot du jour, and the United States to the old USSR. Guess what you peroxide-poisoned harpy?? If this WAS like the USSR and President Obama WAS like Stalin, you wouldn't be free to waste taxpayer money and the courts time on your delusional little jihad.

No, you would be rotting in a Gulag or buried in a shallow unmarked grave somewhere. You wouldn't be allowed to prattle on like you have anything even close to a clue about this country and how very special and wonderful it is. Because it's obvious you Don't Have A Single Goddamn Clue About ANYTHING to do with the United States, Democracy, or Freedom.

Yes, we get it, you don't like the President of the United States. Your fear and hatred of him is so pronounced and so vivid that you've created a tapestry of lies, myths, and outright falsehoods not just about the President, but about the Constitution, the House, the Senate, the Judicial system, the Military, and very other institution that refuses to buy into your fucking delusion.

And you're upset now that some people may want to see your US citizenship revoked?? Well, Boo--Fucking-Who. Guess what?? If you don't like this country, then LEAVE! Because that's another freedom you didn't have back in the USSR. But no, here you can leave if you don't like it here.

And it's obvious you don't. When every word out of your mouth is a lie, when every breath you take spews forth more filth and treason, when every action you take is a disgrace to you, your supposed faith, and your so-called "love" for this country.

You're a filthy, seditionous, treasonous, lying bitch. And quite frankly, I'd love to see your US citizenship revoked and see your traitorous ass deported out of this country, never to sully our air and our liberty again. Because you're an insult to everyone who actually does love this country and what it stands for.

So go on. Leave. Go to whatever country will have you, and take your seditious lying shit with you.

Because you aren't an American, and you don't DESERVE to be an American.

14 January - Once again, Dr. Orly doesn't have any problems promoting violence or assassination in the comments on her page (malware and redirect warning)

(Bold face mine)

"11. Doug Anderson
January 14th, 2013 @ 7:39 pm

Your right, the low life scum of the toilet bowl did remove your petitions. I know orly that you are an officer of the courts and you can’t advocate violence. I’m all for that but at this point in time that when they blatantly ignore every request that we the people are being denied that request. What other options do we have. I’m a US Veteran of the army and out motto says “This we’ll defend”. If it ever came down to this I cannot fathom the amount of chaos, mayhem and deaths that will occur all while these poli’s get there protection while we have nothing. this will be a war of biblical proportions. The only thing I can do right now is offer the lords prayer and I’m not a religious person but it’s all I have at this point. I at this point am going to ask for forgiveness from the lord for whom I have to take out who threatens my life!! It’s the only thing I’m asking for if this justice system fails to hear us. There will be mayhem if he’s gonna do what I’m thinking he’s gonna do!! I can also pray to that someone will take him out for the sake of saving thousands possibly millions of people and that will be shuffled under the rug where it rightfully deserves to stay."

And today's visit from the Secret Service goes to……. (and remember, she approved this and allowed it though her moderation.)

14 January - The Daily Kos talks about the petition to ask the DoJ to seek fines and sanctions against birthers in their lawsuits.

"You may be thinking these cases are no big deal because the public by and large considers the birthers to be ludicrous, with Taitz the biggest joke of all, but they are diverting time away from more serious cases and adding to a backlog of cases assigned to short-staffed judges. In California, Judge England was recently forced to delay a hearing on human trafficking to hear an "emergency" petition by Taitz.

The only way to stop birthers from wasting the court's time is to hit them in the pocketbook. Please sign this petition:

WE PETITION THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION TO: Mandate the AG to seek sanctions, costs, and attorneys' fees to recover taxpayer funds used to defend birther lawsuits. Hundreds of repetitious and frivolous lawsuits have been filed challenging President Obama's status as a natural born citizen. These lawsuits have clogged up the courts and cost the taxpayers millions of dollars in court costs and attorneys' fees.

We, the taxpayers, respectfully petition for an Executive Order or directive to the Attorney General to seek to recover taxpayer funds expended in defending frivolous Birther lawsuits by requesting sanctions, costs, and attorneys' fees in each and every pending or future case.

In case you need more justification, Taitz has committed a number of unethical actions, including asking supporters to harass the families of those who died in Benghazi and the parents of an infant with the last name of Obama who died. She has accused republican- and democratic-appointed judges of treason for not finding in her favor and threatened judges assigned to her cases with treason -- punishable by execution -- if they do not find in her favor. She has outright lied in court, most recently at a January 3 hearing in which she swore to the judge she had served the president and then filed proof of service dated January 4. She has published the names of electors and court administrators on her blog and demanded her supporters harass these people. She has filed frivolous bar complaints with false accusations against government attorneys representing her opponents.

Frankly, Taitz and those engaged in her money raising scheme of filing frivolous birther lawsuits should have to pay. Unfortunately, most judges and attorneys just try to disentangle themselves as quickly as possible, without considering the cumulative effect of the birthers' harassment.

If you can find two minutes to sign this petition, I would be grateful. And if you would not mind recommending this post to keep it visible for a bit, I would also appreciate it."

The petition is here. Please sign it.

14 January - It's so fun when birthers turn on each other.

"Bildo
January 14, 2013 at 6:36 pm

Sooo, Orly is an attorney. A member of the BAR? A British agent? Controlled by the Lawyer’s Guild of Great Britain? How a-musing. I hate to be negative but don’t we all know about the lawyer/attorney thing?
I’d like to see her “License to practice Law”. I asked our DA for his and he handed me his BAR card. I laughed at him. I love making those jerks squirm. Our DA has NO license to practice law!!! Does Orly?"

"drkate
January 14, 2013 at 6:52 pm

or a Mossad plant?"

"Bildo
January 14, 2013 at 8:12 pm

Could very well be. Those creeps are everywhere."

Hey, Dr. Orly. These are your fellow birthers. How does it feel to hang around people as anti-Semitic as Dr. Kate and her septic tank of floaters??

Oh, that's right. You don't care that they hate you for the religion you claim to follow and see you as part of some deep dark conspiracy. They hate Obama too, and that's all that matters to you.

15 January - The Huffington Post reports on Dr. Orly's stupid petition.

"Her plan includes six hours of picketing the White House on Sunday during Obama's private inauguration in the building. She did not indicate where at the White House she would be meeting supporters.

On Monday, Taitz asked her followers to join her for another six hours of picketing in front of the Supreme Court. Taitz has a petition before the court demanding that it invalidate Obama's victory, which the court is scheduled to discuss during a Feb. 15 conference session. The Monday protest will occur at the same time as Obama's public inauguration at the neighboring Capitol. The Supreme Court is on the opposite side of the Capitol from Obama's swearing in and speech.

"Corrupt officials and judges are committing treason and criminally complicit in cover up of forged IDs for Obama. Regime propaganda media is not reporting," Taitz wrote on her website. "The only way for us to spread the word is by being there in Obama’s face with signs 'Squatter in the WH with forged IDs and a stolen Soc. Sec number'. 'Obama using forged IDs, Supreme Court to decide February 15th.'"

Taitz also announced a new petition on the White House website demanding Obama's resignation for using what she calls forged identification. The petition reiterates previous Taitz claims that Obama is using a false Social Security number issued in Connecticut, along with a false last name.

As of Tuesday morning, Taitz's petition had less than 100 signatures on the White House petition website. She said a previous petition she posted on Monday had close to 1,000 signatures, but was removed from the website, for what she said were terms of use violations. The White House petition website includes a series of terms of use, including prohibiting the disclosure of information that would violate a person's privacy."

15 January - Petition to deport Dr. Orly here.

"The so-called dentist/lawyer/realtor Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., has made a career of attempting to undermine the United States Constitution and our rightfully elected President, Barack Obama. For her seditious actions she no longer deserves the coveted citizenship that the United States has granted her."

15 January - Haven't seen much from Paul Guthie, AKA "Padawan Pauly" of late. Well, Arnie Rosner posts a PDF of what he calls a "historically significant document". The mind reels at the thought.

Padawan Pauly is, of course, the birther who seems to have this fixation for the "Sacred Sperm of US Citizenship" theory, that a mother's citizenship counts for naught and only good old fashioned Red White And Blue spermies can make a natural born US citizen.

So what is this PDF? Well, if you go to his website, you find this:

"January 14, 2013

From: The Office of General Jedi Pauly

To: My fellow American Patriots

Since 10 days after the inauguration of Obama in 2009, I had realized that Obama was not a natural born Citizen since he was born to a foreign father who was never a U.S. citizen. Those who qualify for the Office of President must be born to a U.S. State citizen father, because both the place of birth of the offspring and the political condition of the mother are irrelevant in determining natural born Citizen status.

I made a promise 4 years ago to Reverend Doctor Manning that I would not stand by and let Obama get away with enslaving the natural born Citizens of the United States. I now have made good on that promise. As of January 14, 2013, 10:45am Eastern Time, I have filed a civil suit against the United States and Obama and various defendants, naming them in a criminal conspiracy to overthrow the United States government and enslave Her People.

It is now an established fact in official government court records that Mr. Obama does not qualify for his Office because he is not a natural born Citizen. I invite you to read the proof of the claim above.

As of January 14, 2013, 10:45am Eastern standard time, I, Paul Guthrie, (a.k.a. Jedi Pauly) have established a copyright claim in court by this filing, as the sole discoverer of the true objective meaning and definition of natural born Citizen."

Yes, Padawan Pauly has his very own birther lawsuit. Complete with legal threat.

"This document that I am making public on my site jedipauly.com is putting everyone on legal notice. Be very careful how you treat me from now on, as I am very angry and am liable to vent it upon anyone who does not accept the objective truth and facts as are established in law in the U.S. Courts and under the Constitution. Now that the facts have been established and public notice has been given, if you continue to impugn or libel Mr. Guthrie, he will amend his complaint and add you to his 50 million dollar suit and report your seditious criminal Hate Crime activity to the Federal authorities who are responsible for prosecuting Hate Crimes and other violations of Title 18 U.S. Criminal Code, such as Title 18 USC § 2381 - Treason, Title 18 USC § 4 - Misprision of Felony, Title 18 USC § 2383 - Rebellion or Insurrection, Title 18 U.S.C. § 2382 - Misprision of Treason, Title 18 USC § 2384 - Seditious Conspiracy."

As for the lawsuit itself, it was filed 14 January 2013, in US District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. Case number 1:12-CV-0080 JMS-DKL

(Scribd link here)

"Paul A. Guthrie, in propria persona, (A.K.A. General Jedi Pauly)"

OMG. He actually called himself "General Jedi Pauly" as the PLAINTIFF!!

As for the Defendants?

"United States of America; I: I 3 -cv- 0 0 8 0 JMS -DKL
Barrack Hussein Obama II, the alleged President of the United States, of America, and individually;
Joseph Robinette Biden Jr., the alleged Vice President of the United States of America, and individually;
Martin Dempsey, the alleged Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to the Office of the President of the United States of America, and individually,
Eric Holder, the alleged Attorney General of the United States of America, and individually,
Hillary Rodham Clinton, the alleged Secretary of the United States of America, and individually,
Elena Kagan, the alleged Supreme Court Justice of the United States of America, and individually,
Sonia Sotomayor, the alleged Supreme Court Justice of the United States of America, and individually,
United States Congress;
United States Senate;
U.S. House of Representatives; et al.;"

And a partridge in a pear tree.

"2) The fraud mentioned above is a conspiracy to permit a foreign political invasion, the result of a failure to apply the Title of Nobility provisions of the Constitution to U.S. citizen mothers who give birth to the offspring of foreign fathers in order to prevent those offspring from acting like Royalty who will be politically competing with the native U.S. citizen offspring for the Office of President of the United States.

3) The fraud perpetrated by the defendants has caused the native government of the People that is established by the Constitution, to be replaced with a Monarchal- Religious government that is foreign to the United States of America, which places her native citizens under unlawful military occupation to a foreign King and his government that enslaves the natural born U.S. Citizen to a foreign power and authority which deprives the plaintiff and his fellow native citizens of their Liberty and Freedom and Legislative Powers."

Oy vey….

"Yet, the controversy will not go away and is now only growing worse due to the defendant Mr. Obama being selected to the Office of President once again, thus more cases are now being filed. The discovery made by the plaintiff Mr. Guthrie in this case before the court will stop all the controversy in the courts and settle this issue once and for all time."

So what is this shocking discovery??

"9) The fact is that natural born Citizen is fully defined within the Constitution of the United States of America, not by words, but by Intent and by Political Context which does not actually require one to look to foreign sources outside of the Constitution for meaning, as one only needs the Declaration of Independence for a little guidance with comprehending the legal and Historic Political Context in Article II, but it does require one to apply the mechanisms of the Constitution itself (the Titles of Nobility provisions, the First Amendment in the Bill of Rights, and the Equal Protection Clauses), which when applied, actually define natural born Citizen meaning. No one has ever done this in 222 years as far as the plaintiff Guthrie has been able to determine, and certainly no one has done this yet in any matters in controversy regarding Obama, or else the courts would have granted subject matter jurisdiction by now, as the courts would be able to take cognizance of a specific, non-general grievance, injury, and remedy.

So I presume this is only because nobody else stood on their head and looked at the Constitution cross-eyed while doing Thunderbird and NyQuil jello shots before Pauly.

"12) Further, the discovery by plaintiff Guthrie will prove to the Court that his case is distinguished from all others so far regarding Obama and his eligibility in that plaintiff's case does have subject matter jurisdiction and standing because the discovered definition of natural born Citizen is a self-evident truth of Nature and natural reality that is beyond the subjective beliefs of Judges or Kings, which allows the court to take cognizance of an objective injury that arises under the laws of the U.S. Constitution that is not general in nature, or that effects everyone equally, or is just a general grievance. The discovered definition of natural born Citizen shows the Court that there is a need for a remedy and that the remedy is well within the court's jurisdiction and power to provide."

I am suspecting the court may disagree with his novel approach.

19) Defendant Barack Hussein Obama II, [hereinafter referred to as Obama or King Obama]"

Somehow I'm suspecting the judge is going to be rolling their eyes at this one.

"34) Plaintiff Paul Guthrie is the only person alive who has cracked the code of the Constitution and has discovered the objective definition of Article II natural born Citizen."

See above comment about Thunderbird and NyQuil jello shots.

"39) Due to 31 through 38 above, the defendants have all overthrown the native People's government that was established by the Constitution of the United States, and they have established a Monarchy-Religion for a government with a King that they call President. The government now operates strictly like a religion with the laws based upon purely subjective beliefs, with nothing objective and tangible to prove that the country is governed by any established objective standard rule of law, or that the People are bound to accept that the laws are valid and must be obeyed, as no consent can be shown to have been obtained from the People by the three branches for any laws that they have passed since Obama has been in power.

40) As a result of 39, the current three branches of the U.S. government form a non-Representative, non-elected foreign government that bases the source of its authority for its laws to come from the foreign country of Kenya."

What the hell is this crap??? Does Padawan Pauly actually think that anyone who didn't freebase lead paint chips as a toddler is going to buy into this flight of insanity??

"41) As a result of 39 and 40, the plaintiff Paul Guthrie has been a man without a country since the first selection of Obama in 2008, and the situation is still ongoing and growing worse."

More like "a man without a reality" And yes, his psychosis is ongoing and growing worse.

"The plaintiff Mr. Guthrie has been forced by the actions of the defendants to be living in terror like a 'Jew' in Nazi Germany in the 1930's or 1940's, or like a black slave during slavery in the South. The actions of the defendants have stripped Guthrie of any recognition or protection of his citizenship status and the political rights that are attached to that status."

*Faceplant* He actually went there. The sick, twisted delusional son of a bitch went there.

"52) Mr. Obama is the offspring of a U.S. citizen mother and foreign father, making him a naturalized-at-birth U.S. citizen (Positive Law only, adopted citizen), the opposite of a natural born U.S. Citizen. (Natural Law only, born to a U.S. citizen father from a State, inherited right of citizenship ) (natural fact)

53) Due to 49, 50, 51, 52 above, Obama is not a natural born Citizen and is barred by the Constitution from serving as President and has no natural right or legal right claim to that Office. (logical deduction natural fact)"

You use that word "logic" I don't think it means what you think it does.

"Those that are born under the 14th Amendment are natural born citizens with a lower case 'c' of some country as is determined by the offspring's paternal parent (male father) and the codes of his foreign country. His offspring are just not natural born citizens (synonymous with 'native offspring of a native father') of the United States under Article II meaning (from a State of the Union). If they were, that would make them natural born Citizens, and not natural born citizens, a term which means native members of some other political society at the time of birth other than the United States of America. The United States positive law authority does not apply in order to define the offspring of foreign fathers and their natural born citizen status as to not interfere with that native right that exists in the foreign jurisdiction of the father. This is one of the effects of the Title of Nobility provisions of the Constitution upon the offspring of male fathers. Those who rely upon the 14h Amendment for the definition of their citizenship and political rights within U.S. society have all of the same rights as a native U.S. natural born Citizen with the exception of the political right to be President or Vice President. The Constitution was not created to recognize and protect such a natural political right for a male foreign citizen and his offspring, as their natural political rights are already defined and secured in the native society of the foreign father."

So here he's mixed together his "sacred sperm of citizenship" theory with the "only a 14th Amendment citizen" theory beloved of white nationalists and people like Gordon Epperly (who Padawan Pauly has cited in the past).

"C) Obama's father was an alien to the United States, so Mr. Obama does not possess the right to be President of the U.S., nor can he claim a natural right to citizenship, as his father cannot pass on that right to his offspring, given that rights only come from male U.S. citizen fathers who are State citizens and given that we do not recognize Titles of Nobility under our Constitution, which prohibits their creation. This is a natural fact."

No, this is a freaking delusion.

"D) Nature binds a male to only his own political society of which the male is a member, so that he can only create natural members of his own society, regardless of his choice in female mate and her political condition (citizenship), and only by the male's own authority and voluntary consent. Males never have to submit themselves to an authority other than themselves in order to create natural members of their own political societies. Only the male possesses the natural right to pass on natural membership and natural political rights to the offspring by his own authority. This is a universal natural law."

"…..every sperm is sacred, every sperm is safe. If a sperm gets wasted, Emerich gets irate…."

"E) Female citizens are not naturally politically bound to any one society, and can create natural members of any society, or even several different societies, regardless of her political condition (citizenship), which is irrelevant in determining the natural born status of her offspring, and regardless of her consent. Females do not possess the natural right to pass on natural membership and natural political rights to the offspring on their own authority since they are not hermaphrodites, and are required to submit to a male authority in order for them to secure the ability to be able to create natural members of any one particular society. This is a universal natural law."

Why do I get the feeling that Padawan Pauly hasn't had a date or steady relationship in a decade or so??

"THIS ENDS THE DEFINITIONS SECTION"

But not the bullshittery.

"63) Due to 61, the freedom, or natural right, for female U.S. citizens to voluntarily choose in which political society to create natural born members is unsecured by the Constitution which exposes females to rape by foreign males who can create offspring that can become President.

64) Due to 63, the male U.S. citizen is forced to compete with foreign males and their offspring for entitlement to hold the Office of President.

65) The Constitution never intended to, nor does it, secure those political right privileges for foreign males or their offspring."

The Constitution never said any such thing about the horrors of un-American sperm you freaking dolt.

Why do I get the feeling Pauly "lost" a partner to some foreign-born gentleman who didn't treat her like a walking womb waiting for the fertile seed of Pauly's all-American ejaculation? I am SO hoping a female judge gets this case....

"78) The facts related in 77 above indicate a reason for plaintiff Guthrie to be concerned that he is about to suffer an injury to his rights of due process and even physical safety since now Guthrie has objective proof of the definition of natural born Citizen that requires no additional paper trail evidence (birth certificate), since one only needs the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, the rules of jurisprudence, and your reason and five senses to discover whether or not defendant Obama is qualified to hold his Title and Office. "

Somehow I suspect Padawan Pauly hasn't been within parsecs of reason in quite sometime.

"There are only three possible options: (1) the defendant's Positive Law Theory, which violates 51b above, (2) the Unity Theory, of Purpura v. Sebelius, No. 11-2303 (3d Cir. Sept. 29, 2011), 132 U.S. 1631 (2012) rehearing denied, Kerchner v. Obama, 612 F.3d 204 (2010), Taitz v. Obama, 707 F.Supp.2d 1 (2010) and all the 100 plus other plaintiff cases, which violate both 51a and 51b above, or (3) The Natural Law Theory of the Father."

Well, there's also (4) "Plaintiff is a bat guano crazy loon with delusions of adequacy."

"79) Upon filing his case, plaintiff Guthrie is going to automatically run into resistance from those who have much to lose financially and political by having the truth exposed."

I think you're going to run more into resistance from reality.

"Before he even files, plaintiff Guthrie realizes that this case is headed for the Supreme Court of the United States of America and that there are two members already of that court who are not legitimate and who have a lot to lose by having the truth come out."

So we already have a warning he's going to accept "no" for an answer.

Make that a female judge willing to sanction his happy ass.

"Plaintiff Guthrie does not even know if this case will be given to a district judge who is not a magistrate judge, but instead is an Article III judge, and whether or not the judge assigned will be an appointee of the defendant Obama."

Make that a female judge appointed by President Obama, willing to sanction his happy ass.

"80) Due to the facts stated in 79 above, plaintiff Guthrie has been living in fear for over 4 years, like a Jewish person under Hitler in the 1930's and 1940's, afraid to come out and speak the truth and obtain his citizenship rights, and thus other rights of his native society, for fear of bringing the wrath and societal violence upon himself that is being caused by the privileged political society of King Obama and his government, the named defendants."

Oh get over yourself. You've been babbling about your "sacred sperm of US citizenship" crap for years now. The Pest and eFail used to be infested with it, and not even most of your fellow birtherstani bought into it. Which may say something when you're too freaking delusional for even the meth of the month club members at the Pest and eFail.

"81) If the courts and defendants do not immediately recognize plaintiff Guthrie's rights and discovery, and move to protect him from the government of King Obama and his society of privileged followers, then both the courts and the defendants will cross the line from a civil conspiracy to deprive plaintiff of his citizenship status and rights, and will then be engaged in a knowing and purposeful conspiracy to commit fraud in order to deprive the plaintiff Guthrie of his rights, which is a criminal act, and is also a civil act of libel against plaintiff Guthrie ."

Oh now that's novel. Dr. Orly screams "treason" every time a court rules against her, but Padawan Pauly is threatening them with libel charges if they say "no" to him.

"Will plaintiff Guthrie and others in his condition then have to flee for their lives, like a Jewish person in the 1930's or 1940's, and seek political asylum in a foreign country?"

*Snork* I'd like to see you try, Somehow I doubt many countries will accept "Help, there's a scary black man claiming he's president" as a valid excuse for asylum.

Well, not POLITICAL asylum at any rate. Which doesn't rule out the kind of asylum that involves happy drugs and "I love me" wrap-around jackets.

"83) A king's sources of authority for his claim of artificial sovereign political authority, or the legal right claim to be the political head of state for the country or countries via his offspring made with foreign females, are the subjective beliefs in both violent unlawful force known as Might makes Right, and in forced faith, opinion and a belief in God, called The Divine Right of Kings.

84) Due to 83 above, the U.S. citizen is required to accept that King Obama is God's chosen messenger upon Earth with regard to secular and religious political matters of the society and state, which necessarily requires one to believe in God, given that King Obama has no legitimate natural source of native U.S. sovereign political authority to point to in order to objectively prove just what source of political authority entitles him to a lawful claim of a natural right to the Office of President of the United States."

*Blink* *blink* *blink* *BLINK*

"86) Due to 83 through 85 above, petitioner Paul Guthrie who is an Atheist, is required to worship and view King Obama and his government to be God in order to accept that the laws are legitimate and must be obeyed. Guthrie dare not make a public ruckus and expose the truth and try to secure his rights of conscience, or else he might have to endure the wrath of King Obama and his government and their irrational ignorant religious followers who have no clue what a natural born Citizen is and don't care anyway."

Here's a clue (don't be scared, I know you've never seen one before, so it's novel to you). We're not mocking you because of some "religious duty" or other such nonsense.

We're mocking you because you're a screaming lunatic. Got it? Good!

"Guthrie's rights of conscience that guarantee him an objective standard natural order (rule of law) to be recognized as the basis of law and Justice are meant to be secured and protected in the First Amendment, and are meant to be secured by the definition of natural born Citizen as being according to the U.S. State citizen father. This protects Mr. Guthrie's right to be an Atheist and to live by, and exercise his objective beliefs, which includes the recognition in positive law of the natural right to a standard of Law so that he may determine to be governed by an objective rule of law, which is essential in order for him to be able to secure his Atheism. That protection already exists and is already supposed to be provided to him in the discovered objective definition of natural born Citizen that is codified into the Organic law (Article II). If only people would recognize it and enforce it, then plaintiff Guthrie could have his natural right to the free exercise of his entitled beliefs (Atheism) permitted to resume unmolested, that has been unlawfully interfered with by the ongoing actions of the defendants."

Funny, what it sounds like to me is that you're demanding people ignore the law, ignore the Constitution, and be forced to accept YOUR version of what the law and reality means. Basically, you're demanding that people follow your beliefs or else.

And the difference between this and a fundamentalist religion is what exactly??

"88) Plaintiff Paul Guthrie is a pauper. He is too poor to owe any taxes. He is not a taxpayer at this time and is not even required to file a return because he earns under the minimum requirement for tax filing."

Nobody buying your hemp-based artwork anymore?? Or did you lose your day job?

"89) In order to secure his Liberty and not be subject to the slavery of involuntary servitude to a foreign government that is not his government, plaintiff Guthrie has been forced to remain impoverished in order to secure his political freedom and personal liberty, or else not pay taxes that he does not owe to a foreign government and hope they don't persecute him for a crime that is not a crime and for which they have no rightful authority to prosecute him. If plaintiff Guthrie should some day earn enough to be required to file and pay taxes, and he then tries to defend himself against the IRS and raises the truth of the objective definition of natural born Citizen, which is a positive defense, he would then run afoul of the injuries raised earlier in Subsection 2, or be subject to ridicule and attacks upon his character and reputation by the government via IRS proceedings, due to the illusion of legitimacy that the wrongful actions of the defendants are causing."

Hmmmm….wonder if someone is getting paid under the table.

"90) Due to 89 above, the plaintiff Paul Guthrie and all U.S. citizen tax payers are forced to suffer the intolerable injury of being extorted by the King and his government and forced into involuntary servitude via Taxation without Representation to have to give the fruits of their labor to a foreign government and power without their consent, or remain impoverished to avoid this unpatriotic duty and avoid the physical threats to one's personal safety, name, and reputation as directed at Guthrie unlawfully by the defendants, and unjustly by his society, which prevents him from establishing a credible reputation like other normal people."

Got news for you. Your lack of income isn't what's preventing you from establishing a credible reputation like other normal people. The fact that you're not only a few dozen french fries short of a happy meal, but also missing the nuggets, drink, box, AND little toy surprise is what's preventing you from establishing a credible reputation like other normal people.

"91) King Obama, his supporters, the three branches of government, and the Popular Press and News Media coin or use the term "birther" as a label to attach to people like Plaintiff Paul Guthrie, which is an insulting label meant to devalue the reputation of the person and his citizenship rights by discrediting anything a "birther" says regarding the fact that Mr. Obama is not a natural born Citizen and so is not eligible to hold Office.

92) One earns the distinction as a 'birther' by publicly telling the truth that Obama is not a natural born Citizen, exposing oneself to public ridicule by publicly acting like a person who believes that we are supposed to be under a Constitutional government that is limited by the acceptance of Nature and Her Natural Laws, and that we are supposed to be governed by the rule of that law, and that everyone is supposed to be equal and no one is supposed to be above the law. That is enough to be branded and stigmatized with the label "birther" by the government, by the public at large, and by the popular Press and News outlets, and so be disinherited of one's citizenship"

Awww….. The bat-guano crazy birther doesn't like being called a birther. Wahhh.

"Slaves have no political rights recognized, that is why they are slaves. The term 'birther' serves the same purpose, function, and effect in society, to deny rights and to separate slave people non-citizens from Royal privileged political people citizens or institutions (defendants), and to deny the native people non-citizen slave political society any right to citizenship or a government, and thus deny them any ability to secure Freedom, Justice, and Equality, the political and societal rights such as those in the Royal political society have."

He's actually saying that birthers are SLAVES????

Wow, the insanity, it burns.

"94) Ever since the unlawful selection of King Obama and his conveyance into the Office of President, the natural born Citizen 'birther' has been and continues to be a slave without a government, who is outside of the political arena and law due to his beliefs, not based upon skin color, but based upon objective belief in the rule of Law. Those who continue to attach the stigma 'birther' are seen to be purposefully acting to libel and harm and keep the U.S. natural born Citizen 'birther' ostracized and enslaved to the arbitrary unlawful violent authority of a foreign government and power. The effectiveness of this new discriminatory term 'birther' in depriving the native natural born U.S. Citizen of the benefits of his native government is seen to be extremely effective, given that after over 100 attempts in court and over 4 years, the natural born U.S. Citizen 'birther' still does not have his Freedom and Liberty, Due Process of Law, or Government back."

Okay, I'm sane, rational, sober, and haven't smashed my head repeatedly against a brick wall, so it's rather hard for me to follow Padawan Paul's logic here. But what he seems to be saying here is that the fact that every single court has rejected the birthers claims, is de facto proof that the birthers have been enslaved and are lacking any rights to due process.

The fact that they've infested the courts almost 200 times with their paranoid conspiracy theories is proof they have rights to due process and the right to a fair hearing. The fact they keep being told "no" has nothing do with "slavery" or being "outside the political arena", and everything to do with the fact that their conspiracy theories are not supported by law, the Constitution, credible evidence, or reality.

"This is just like how, in the southern States, the black male father slave was denied State citizenship to pass on to his offspring, and therefore deprived of his ability to secure his rightful Freedom and Liberty for himself or for his offspring. The inability of the black slave and of plaintiff Paul Guthrie to secure their political Liberty, Freedom, Justice and Equality to be recognized as coming from a State citizen father is caused by the same type of force that affected the black slave."

Actually the law at the time was that the child partook of the status of the mother. Which is why you had a lot of slave children who looked a lot like their owner or owner's relatives. Funny how those children didn't get the "sacred sperm of US citizenship.

Actually this may be the strongest way to nuke Padawan Pauly's little delusion. Sally Hemings bore children by her owner, Thomas Jefferson. When the children were adult, they were freed by Jefferson himself (Sally Hemings was later freed by Jefferson's daughter). If the "sacred sperm of citizenship" theory was true, these children would have had citizenship - and freedom from birth. And yet their father had to free them - and legally could have SOLD them at auction instead.

The fact he's comparing himself - and birthers in general - to enslaved African-Americans is not only absurd, it's pretty damn offensive as well.

"109) Due to 108 above, plaintiff has no choice but to conclude that the entire Nation must consist either of stupidly or willfully ignorant fools, or of those who are under the influence of some form of mass delusion, hypnotic trance, or threat of violence.

110) As a result of 98 through 109, plaintiff has no choice but to conclude that it is the Patriotic duty of the first person who discovers the true meaning and definition of Article II natural born Citizen to file a petition with the Court, so as to break the spell and illusion, that all may take cognizance of the situation, in order to apply the Constitution to protect the U.S. citizen from being defined by the government's actions to be a George Washington!

(snip)

112) By filing this petition, plaintiff Paul Guthrie is establishing a public record that he is the first natural born Citizen person in the country to rightfully file a claim in Court that establishes objectively in Nature, as a self-evident truth of Nature, what the objective definition and meaning of Article II natural born Citizen is, which is a matter of objective truth, and not plaintiff's opinion, nor anyone's opinion, opinion being only subjective truth and hearsay evidence.

113) Mr. Guthrie proves by his filing of this petition that he is the only person in the country who understands how the government and law is supposed to function, making Mr. Guthrie the last surviving natural U.S. sovereign political authority of the country. This is because you cannot claim to have inherited a natural U.S. sovereign political authority if you don't even know what one is and where it comes from. It is obviously that no one in the country besides plaintiff Guthrie knows, given that so many have been trying to determine it for years now and we still have a King and Monarchy form a government, and not a President and Constitutional Republic of the People.

114) Due to 98 through 113 above, Mr. Guthrie fears that those who are seeking to leave King Obama's army and repatriate themselves with the proper Constitutional government of We the People will turn to Mr. Guthrie to lead them like a George Washington, since by his public filing he is showing the world that he is the only person in the country with sufficient legal, scientific, historic knowledge who is not under the spell of mass hypnosis of the King and his government, who knows what a natural born Citizen is, and what the Constitution means, and how the government is supposed to function."

So basically he's saying that because he found this supposed super-duper uber secret hidden in the Constitution, then he's the de facto leader of the US military and that the US military has to ignore the orders of that scary black man and follow "General" Padawan Pauly.

It's going to take an entire production run of Haloperidol to put a dent in this level of psychosis.

"Nature's political laws, Declaration of Independence: Governments are created by males, and the Constitution: "We the People" which includes the male citizens who naturally create the government since males are naturally territorial creatures who define the political boundaries of a society. It is not the females, who are at a natural disadvantage when it comes to defending any claimed territory or enforcing rules and regulations, so they do not define the secular political boundaries of a country unless they are Queens. Females only naturally define membership for the offspring in a religious political society, the family of mankind. Females naturally fight to protect their children and husbands, males naturally fight to protect their adult females and offspring by defining and protecting some territory and establishing rules within the territory in order that they can protect the females and offspring from foreign males. This is why in the natural state, males create the government not females."

"Dating? Love-life? Companionship?? A Jedi Pauly craves not these things. Alone is he. Always alone….."

"116) Mr. Guthrie resents having this duty thrust upon him and should not even have to be in the Court wasting their time and his…."

But he has no life.

"131) The case must be granted standing and taken up because now that defendant Obama has been selected to another and final term (we may only hope, seeing as the Constitution does not seem to apply to him), if he is not discovered and removed and punished for his actions before his term expires, then a precedent will have been established that will cause the plaintiff and other 'birthers' like him to lose the recognition and protection of their political rights forever, rights that are meant to be secured by the Constitution."

"Wahhh! The scary black man is STILL President!! WAHHHHH!!!! MOMMY!!!!!"

"132) For the reasons and authorities stated in 128 through 131, and for the clear and obvious stated injuries related in 61 through 127 and incorporating the Definitions sections, the Court has standing to hear and judge the case on its merits of facts and law that are stated, and issue the relief that is sought by the Plaintiff(s) in this case, as the likelihood of the plaintiff(s) to prevail on the merits of facts and law as stated, is overwhelming"

I suspect the only thing "overwhelming" is the laughter of the clerks and judges who review this steaming pile o' bat-guano crazy, before dismissing it.

"134) Incorporating all the facts stated in this petition, and as a result of 133 above, by the Presidential Survivability Act of 1947, the current Speaker of the House of Representatives John Boehner is the lawful President. A notice must issue to the Speaker of the House of Representatives John Boehner informing him that there is an incapacity that exists that prevents both defendant Obama and Biden from serving in their official capacities, due to the Congress failing to properly do their job under the Twentieth Amendment, as they failed to discover that Obama is not a natural born Citizen. Defendant Congress must be ordered to take notice of the objective definition of natural born Citizen, so that John Boehner can take the Office of President and then trigger the Twenty-Fifth Amendment to appoint a Vice President. This will then permit Congress to step in under the Twenty-Fifth Amendment and deal with the injuries and damages which they will have created for themselves within the Congress."

"……to dream, the impossible dream……."

"136) A judgment needs to issue declaring that all Acts, laws, rules, regulations, executive orders, etc., passed under the authority of the defendant Obama and Congress etc., since Obama's inauguration in 2009, are null and void."

And, of course, the magic reset button.

"137) Plaintiff Guthrie fears for his safety, name, and reputation, by coming forward to file this complaint which reveals the truth of his discovery of the objective definition and meaning of natural born Citizen."

Don't worry about your name and reputation. Both of them are now "mud".

"Guthrie prays that the court would take note of the objective fact that Guthrie has established the definition of natural born Citizen and as a result he needs the assistance of the court to guide Guthrie in how to word a motion and order which will set off the correct chain of events that will cause the correct responsible actors to correct the ship of state and rescue Guthrie and all the natural born Citizens from their plight."

So let me get this straight. You pull a completely batshit crazy theory theory, completely unsupported by anything even close to facts or reality, completely out of your posterior exhaust port, and now you expect the courts to help you enforce and expand upon it??

What the hell color IS the sky on your home planet anyway???

"138) Guthrie prays the court will award Guthrie his actual damages in the amount of 10,000 dollars due to the loss of income over the 4 years that Guthrie has been so emotionally distressed that he has not been able to effectively make his jewelry or effectively interact with his customers and make sales, plus expenses pertaining to this suit."

So basically his delusion, paranoia, and general freak-out about President Obama has been so intense that he's suffered a complete psychotic break and is unable to function as a productive member of society anymore.

How very sad.

"Guthrie also is seeking compensatory damages of 50 million dollars for the terror and extreme emotional stress and loss of Freedom and quality of life over the last four years that is still ongoing and now growing worse due to the actions of the defendants, and asks the court to consider a punitive damage award for the egregious nature of the offences being committed against natural born Citizens and Mr. Guthrie."

And a pony. Can't forget the pony.

Wow. I have a massive pain in my head after wading though all of that.

Batshit crazy this padawan is, yes?? Full of crazy, full of bantha dodo. I see special jedi robes for young padawan pauly, special robes with long sleeves.....

15 January - Politics USA has an article about the petition to require that sanctions and costs be sought in birther lawsuits.

"One might think that the birthers, since they are a subset of alleged conservatives, would want to repay these costs since they are allegedly against any debt, also against frivolous lawsuits and also against free loaders sucking up government welfare (the patience of the courts notwithstanding, apparently)."

15 January - Dr. Orly throws a fit because her second try at a petition was also found to be a TOS violation (malware and redirect warning)

"AS OBAMA NAZIS REMOVED MY PETITION FROM THE “WETHEPEOPLE@WHITEHOUSE.GOV” TWICE, A PETITION WAS PLACE IN THE CRAIGSLIST. PLEASE, POST IT ON CRAIGSLIST ALL OVER THE NATION. EACH AND EVERY AMERICAN CITIZEN DESERVES TO KNOW THE TRUTH ABOUT A CRIMINAL WITH ALL FORGED IDS SQUATTING IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted on | January 15, 2013"

"Craigslist?" Really??

And there's nothing racist about the term "squatting", oh no, not at all.

What a nasty, evil, bitch.

15 January - The Orange County Weekly comments on the "Birther Sanctions" petition.

"The petition-gathering page at WhiteHouse.gov, which aims to create the appearance of open government and we the people and yadda yadda yadda, rolled into news cycles thanks to the Sandy Hook massacre. Gun control might divide even latte-stained, beret-wearing Weeklings, but a new WhiteHouse.gov petition we all can get behind calls for sticking birthers like Aliso Viejo's Orly Taitz with the government's legal bills to fight their asinine lawsuits.

Taitz, of course, routinely gets rejected in federal courts across the land as she seeks to have President Barack Obama removed from office because, she claims, he was not born in the U.S., and the lawyer/dentist/real-estate saleslady/Arianna Huffington voice coach scores goose eggs about as often as she tries to keep Barry off ballots, get his birth certificate, win the release of his college records or otherwise make Donald Trump hard.

Sometimes, judges have ordered Taitz to pay fees or fines for her judicial missteps, prompting ol' Orl to turn to her nut bar base for donations. But there remains the cost of occupying the time of members of the court system--think judges, clerks and napping bailiffs--and paperwork and other matters with associated costs."

Once again, the link to the petition is here

15 January - Oh please…. (malware and redirect warning)

"EXPOSING A CRIMINAL WITHOUT HIS CONSENT IS AN INVASION OF PRIVACY-
Posted on | January 15, 2013 "

Since you DON'T seem to understand how the American Justice System works, (or ANYTHING else about America), let me explain it to you as simply as possible.

See, there's a couple of concepts that you may have skipped over at Taft Skool o' Law and Stuff.

One is "rule of law".
Another is "innocent until proven guilty in a court of law."
And the final is "burden of proof lies upon the accuser".

Rule of law means there's a set procedure to determine is one is a criminal or not.

See, someone isn't a criminal just because you got a wild hair up your liposuctioned ass and say they are. They are a criminal when they are found guilty in a court of law by a lawfully recognized jury of one's peers.

That's a "lawfully recognized jury of one's peers", not one of your fantasy tiddlywinks pretend juries.

The other thing is "burden of proof lies upon the accuser". Again, someone isn't a criminal just because your rice krispies told you they are. You have to provide actual evidence, the judge has to rule the evidence as credible, the defense has to have the chance to examine the evidence and cross examine the "experts" involved.

In two separate courtrooms to date, your "evidence" has been ruled non-admissible and non-credible. You have a record of complete and utter failure.

You're not "exposing" anyone, except the world to your own stupidity and obsession.

15 January - Oh look. The Terry Lakin Action Fund had an extra-special call with Padawan Pauly.

"January 15, 2013: Special Call with Paul Guthrie

On January 15, 2013, we did a special interview with Paul Guthrie. We are asking everyone to listen to and read what Paul has to say."

(MP3 here)

Padawan Pauly has a particularly whiny, annoying, self-congratulating voice. And damn, he may be as arrogant as Sibley or Klayman, but with even less reason.

Pauly is also firmly convinced that the end result to his lawsuit is that "King Obama will be led off in handcuffs". The delusion is strong with this one.

Oh, and around 15 minutes in, Pauly flirts with the SovCit "the United States is a corporation" party line.

15 January - "Birther Report" chimes in on Padawan Pauly.

"ThomasThePaine · 3 hours ago

Only violence will restore the Republic."

Someone talks an even bigger game than Dealio.

"weknowthetruth · 3 hours ago

SUPREME COURT HAS GONE ROGUE. INFILTRATED BY THE USURPER. IF THERE IS OR WAS AN HONEST ONE ON THE BENCH, THEY HAVE BEEN THREATENED OR OUTNUMBERED. I NOTICED THAT THE TWO INFILTRATORS OF THE SUPREME COURT ARE NAMED.
>>> AND AGAIN I SAY >>>> THANK YOU GENERAL JEDI PAULY GUTHRIE, GOD SPEED."

Nothing like the crazy egging on the crazy.

Oh, and just as an example of how insane and evil Birther Report is getting, they're getting more and more into the whole "Sandy Hook Conspiracy" thing.

Sickening.

16 January - Padawan Pauly's lawsuit shows on PACER.

(Bold face mine)

"U.S. District Court
Southern District of Indiana (Indianapolis)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:13-cv-00080-JMS-DKL

GUTHRIE v. OBAMA et al
Assigned to: Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Denise K. LaRue
Demand: $9,999,000
Cause: 28:1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Date Filed: 01/14/2013
Jury Demand: Plaintiff
Nature of Suit: 540 Mandamus & Other
Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant"

Yes, TWO female judges!!

Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson

"In November 2008, Magnus-Stinson notified Bayh, who by that point had become one of Indiana's two senators, of interest in a district court judgeship. After Magnus-Stinson underwent a series of interviews with officials from the United States Department of Justice and the Office of the White House Counsel, President Obama on January 20, 2010 nominated Magnus-Stinson to the seat on the Southern District of Indiana, to replace Judge Larry J. McKinney, who took senior status on July 4, 2009.[2] On March 11, 2010, the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary reported Magnus-Stinson's nomination to the full United States Senate. The Senate confirmed Magnus-Stinson in a voice vote on June 7, 2010. She received her commission on June 9, 2010."

Magistrate Judge Denise K. LaRue

"Denise K. LaRue was appointed U. S. Magistrate Judge on May 24, 2011. She fills a new magistrate judge position created for the Southern District of Indiana by the Judicial Conference of the United States. "

Two female judges. One nominated by President Obama, the other appointed during his administration.

Yes Virginia, there IS a Santa Claus.

16 January - How did Mike Zullo, Boy Defective, fare at the Surprise! (AZ) Tea Party shindig?

Well, George Miller states:

"We couldn’t get a quorum for our 850 mile R/T carpool from CA, so we didn’t go. Maybe that was a blessing, from what I heard …."

Well, that doesn't sound good.

"After inquiring about the meeting results/video, we received this report from Jeff Lichter of Surprise, AZ Tea Party:"

And what did he have to say?

"George, thanks for your inquiry. Mike Zullo chose not to have the session videotaped last night."

What a surprise….well, no, not really.

"He did give an update on the ongoing investigation and as he said, “just because it is not in the news right now does not mean nothing is happening.”

So he's waiting for Jerome Corsi to make up new stuff or to warm over more debunked birther claims. Got it.

"In fact, he laid out in general terms some real hopeful information. Check out that latest PP Simmons video. I know Mike is connected to that somehow, but do not know the details. He believes their Plan B (Plan A did not happen) is even much stronger, whatever it is."

So blockbuster A didn't happen, but that's okay, because they have blockbuster B all lined up and it's going to be spectacular, honest, no really it is, we promise this time…

And just why is a supposed "law enforcement investigation" sitting on their supposed evidence? Don't you think that if they HAD anything, it would have gone to an attorney general or prosecutor's office by now??

"So, that probably means either they have very little, or are keeping a blockbuster secret"

I'll take "have very little" for $400.

" Enjoy the coronation on Monday, folks."

You mean the inauguration? Oh, I plan to.

16 January - I guess Joseph Farah isn't too crazy for the "Conservative Presidential Inaugural Prayer Breakfast" after all.

"The strange story of Joseph Farah and the conservative Presidential Inaugural Prayer Breakfast has taken a bizarre turn, with the WorldNetDaily birther conspirator returning to the breakfast's list of distinguished guests and its organizer reportedly repudiating her repeated statements to Media Matters that she never intended to give Farah a leading role.

Rev. Merrie Turner, the top organizer for the January 21 event, told Media Matters on January 9 that Farah had been incorrectly listed as a program guest and she would seek to remove him.

"He was not invited to be involved," she said at that time in a phone interview. "He had permission to write an article about it and it's gone much further than that. That was the initial intent, I never met him before and I didn't know anything about his efforts."

Asked then if she would seek to keep Farah, who as CEO of WorldNetDaily has been the driving force behind conspiracies about President Obama's birth certificate, from being among the event's official speakers, Turner said, "Absolutely, this is not going to by any means be an event for anything being said negative about the president, that will not be allowed."

What a difference a few days makes:

"Farah has also returned to the website's list of distinguished guests.

Turner has a record of incendiary commentary that made it surprising that she would have renounced the birther leader. Nonetheless, she repeatedly did so in her interview with Media Matters.

Media Matters reached out to Turner several times, leaving two voice mail messages and two e-mail messages. On a third phone call, Turner answered, but hung up when asked to comment on the situation."

What a coward.

16 January - According to World Nut Daily, it looks like the prayer breakfast organizer did some kissing up.

"She explained, “Joseph Farah was asked for his help regarding the event. He graciously gave it. He never invited himself to the event. Nor did he ever ask or expect anything in return. We affirm that the event is to pray for America at a critical time and juncture, for the American presidency and government. We also want to clearly state and affirm that it would be an honor to have Joseph Farah be part.

“I am truly sorry for anything said or spoken, any confusion and miscommunication, and for any distress this may have caused Joseph Farah,” she said."

I wonder if this had anything to do with the fact that the keynote speaker, Rabbi Jonathan Cahn, is one of World Nut Daily's stable of writers? Or that one of the publicized guests, Pat Boone, is a columnist for World Nut Daily??

16 January - Dr. Orly takes a break from whining about her petitions to file a notion for reconsideration in her electoral college lawsuit. (malware and redirect warning)

"MOTION for RECONSIDERATION of the TRO by James Grinols, Keith Judd, Thomas Gregory MacLeran, Edward Noonan, Robert Odden. Motion Hearing set for 1/17/2013 at 02:00 PM before Chief Judge Morrison C. England Jr.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibits 1-4)(Taitz, Orly)"

So let me get this straight. She files this a DAY before the motion hearing?? Talk about not having even the BASIC level of courtesy to the courts or her fellow attorneys.

Would the California Bar Association please stop dry-humping unicorns and disbar this woman already??

Oh, and she calls this a "Rule 60 B" motion. Here's Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 60, Part B

"(b) Grounds for Relief from a Final Judgment, Order, or Proceeding. On motion and just terms, the court may relieve a party or its legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons:

(1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect;

(2) newly discovered evidence that, with reasonable diligence, could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59(b);

(3) fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party;

(4) the judgment is void;

(5) the judgment has been satisfied, released, or discharged; it is based on an earlier judgment that has been reversed or vacated; or applying it prospectively is no longer equitable; or

(6) any other reason that justifies relief.

I'm going to go out on a limb, and guess she'll be citing parts 2, 3, and/or 6.

16 January - So this is what Dr. Orly filed:

(Scribd link here)

27 pages, 8 different fonts.

"TRO seeking to enjoin Defendant Barack Hussein Obama from taking the oath of office as a U.S. President on the inauguration day due to his lack of legitimacy for office and fraud committed by him, as the citizen of Indonesia Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barack (Barry) Soetoro, aka Barack (Barry) Obama Soebarkah, due to his run for the U.S. Presidency and position of the Commander in-Chief, while using a forged short form birth certificate, forged long form birth certificate, forged selective Service certificate and a stolen Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 as a proof of his legitimacy and fitness for office."

So the normal steaming pile of taitz.

"60 B MOTION IS SOUGHT BASED ON"

Drumroll please…..

"1.FRAUD BY U.S. ATTORNEYS CLAIMING TO REPRESENT DEFENDANTS, COMPLICITY BY THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IN OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, FRAUD, COVER UP OF OBAMA'S FORGED IDS AND STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER"

So Rule 60 (b) (3)….

"2. Error by the court during January 3 TRO Motion hearing"

And rule 60 (b) (1).

"Obamaforgerygate is Watergate on steroids."

Is that like her new catchphrase?? Is that what she's shouting out in intimate moments now?

"Similarly in the case at hand fraud, obstruction of justice and perjury was committed by the employees of the Department of Justice. In the case at hand Department of Justice/U.S. Attorneys claimed to represent defendants who never agreed to be represented by them, had no clue that Obama Justice Department is representing them in a case against Obama and that in their opposition to the TRO US Attorneys alleged the opposite of what was the position of the defendants."

O RLY??

"US Attorney Benjamin Wagner and Deputy Attorney General Edward Olsen submitted to this court opposition to TRO, claiming to represent Presidential Electors, Congressmen, Senators, Obama and Biden. Based on their representation all of the defendants were represented by them and were opposed to the TRO."

Well, they were representing the electoral college as a whole (which Dr. Orly had filed suit against), the US Congress as a whole (which Dr. Orly had filed suit against), and the US Senate (which Dr. Orly had filed suit against).

In other words, they were doing their jobs.

"Plaintiffs found out that US. Attorneys made a representation which was not true. As an example, Plaintiffs are providing a signed verification from the Presidential Elector Don Ascoli, who signed the Certificate of Vote in Arizona. Mr. Ascoli got a copy of the complaint and summons from the plaintiffs. Mr. Ascoli filled out a questionnaire, where he stated that the U.S. Attorney never contacted him and never advised him that Mr. Ascoli, as a Presidential elector, will be represented by Obama administration's U. S. Attorney’s office in a case challenging legitimacy of Obama, Mr. Ascoli never consented to such representation."

That's nice. Did you include him as an elector BY NAME? Or did you sue the Electoral College AS A WHOLE? Because if you didn't include him as an elector by name, then he's not a defendant. Only the Electoral College as a whole is a defendant.

"This obstruction of justice by the Department of Justice is so egregious that not only the decision to deny TRO should be reversed, but this court has to appoint a special prosecutor similar to prosecutors, such as Archibald Cox in Watergate, United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974), or Special Prosecutor Ken Starr who investigated Whitewater, Whitehouse FBI files controversy, TravelGate. and Monica Lewinsky affair. Allowing a foreign national to usurp the US Presidency with forged and stolen IDs is much more egregious than a small burglary in Watergate or a tryst in Monica Gate."

Oh for pity's sake? REALLY???

"Additionally on 01.04.2013 attorney for the plaintiffs Orly Taitz received a call from Mr. Stuart Pigler, aid for Congressman Mike Rogers, chair of the House intelligence committee. Mr. Pigler just received by certified mail a copy of the complaint and summons (Exhibit 2 certified mail receipt of the package sent to Congressman Rogers and signed by Pigler on 01.04.2013). Mr. Pigler stated that he never received any notification from the Justice department, from the US Attorney’s office and had no idea that U.S. attorneys are representing congressman Rogers in the case and did not know anything about the opposition to TRO filed on behalf of congressman Rogers."

That's nice. Did you include him as an Member of Congress BY NAME? Or did you sue the US Congress AS A WHOLE? Because if you didn't include him as an Member of Congress by name, then he's not a defendant. Only the US Congress as a whole is a defendant.

"Additionally, Taitz received a response from Senator McCain after he got summons and complaint from her. On January 4, after the TRO hearing where the US attorneys opposed the TRO on behalf of the Electors, Congressmen and Senators, McCain was completely clueless about the fact that he even was a defendant in this case. Exhibit 3, Letter from Senator McCain"

That's nice. Did you include him as an US Senator BY NAME? Or did you sue the US Senate AS A WHOLE? Because if you didn't include him as an US Senator by name, then he's not a defendant. Only the US Senate as a whole is a defendant.

This isn't rocket science boys and girls.

"Based on the above it is clear that U.S. attorneys acted on behalf of defendant Obama who they had no right to represent in the first place, as he was sued as a candidate for office and in direct conflict with their duty, pursuant to their oath of office to represent the United States of America."

You sued the President of the United States, claiming he's ineligible to hold office. Guess what, it's a Federal matter.

"DEFENSE DID NOT OPPOSE AND THEREFORE ADMITTED THAT BARACK OBAMA IS USING A FORGED SELECTIVE SERVICE CERTIFICATE, NEVER LAWFULLY SIGNED UP FOR SELECTIVE SERVICE AND THEREFORE NOT ELIGIBLE TO WORK IN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT"

They did no such thing. Dr. Orly is lying though her nitrous-scented teeth.

"Defense did not provide any evidence or any argument to counter those affidavits"

Because a) they were inadmissible, and b) had been debunked many times already.

"If Barry Soetoro came back, than the question is, what happened to Barry Obama? Is he even alive? A number of high ranking officials of the U.S. Government and the government of Hawaii are complicit in the most egregious crimes, cover up of the forgery, however it might be more than fraud and forgery. If Barry Soetoro came from Indonesia instead of Barry Obama, this is espionage."

Wow. She's gone completely into cloud coo-coo land here.

"During the January 3, 2013 hearing this court refused to allow an expert to testify regarding forgery in the released copy of Barack Obama's birth certificate."

Yes. As you had been told BEFORE the hearing.

"Prior to the hearing Plaintiff's attorney received a written confirmation from the deputy of this court that witnesses will be allowed to testify. Attorney Taitz paid for an expert Paul Irey to testify and prove to the court without a shadow of a doubt that alleged birth certificate of Barack Obama represents a crude computer generated forgery and cannot possibly be a copy of the genuine 1961 birth certificate."

First off, you were told BY THE JUDGE no witnesses.
Second off, Paul Irey is even less of an document expert than you are an attorney. You at least have mail-order law degree. Irey doesn't even have the equivalent of that.

"Though this court refused to allow expert testimony, attorney Taitz used the exhibits prepared by the expert to show that the image posted by Obama cannot possibly be a genuine birth certificate for a number of reasons, most notably as the letters in the document are of all different sizes, different shapes and fonts."

I don't think the judge is required to take note of your street-side "press conference".

"Additionally, Taitz is submitting as a manual exhibit an audiotape of the sworn testimony of aforementioned witness Paul Irey at the hearing in the Superior Court of Indiana in a related case Taitz et al v Elections Commission 49D14-1203-MI-012046."

That would be one of the cases where the judge ruled your experts weren't credible.

"Based on the above Plaintiffs move this court to reverse prior decision, issue a TRO, staying swearing of Barack Obama as the US President on 01.20.2013 pending production by Obama and the registrar of Hawaii a valid original birth certificate and valid original microfilm, "

And a pony.

"Simple logic states that the only reason Obama provided to the public a forged selective Service Certificate, forged Birth certificate and is using a stolen Connecticut Social Security number, is because he does not have any valid documents and his presence in the White House represents the most serious risk to the U.S. National security in the history of this nation."

Simple logic would state that would be accurate if the evidence to back said claims was both credible and reliable. It is neither, therefore simple logic would state that those claims would have to be discounted due to lack of real proof to back them up.

"IF THE DEFENDANTS AND THIS COURT CERTIFY OBAMA AS A LEGITIMATE PRESIDENT, WHILE POSSESSING ALL OF THE DOCUMENTS AT HAND, THEY MAY BE LATER PROSECUTED AS BEING A PART OF A RICO, RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD AMERICAN CITIZENS AND COMMIT FOLLOWING PREDICATE ACTS:"

Yes, she is actually threatening the judge here.

"As the transcript is not ready yet, the Plaintiffs are filing this motion based on recollection of hat the court stated."

Which means it's factually incorrect and completely delusional.

"During the court hearing on 01.03.2013 this court asked Plaintiff's Attorney Taitz, which part of "second" doesn't she understand, when Taitz stated that plaintiff Grinols has perfect standing, as he is an elector for Romney, who came in a close second. Taitz did understand the meaning of second, but maybe the court did not understand, what she was referring to."

I would love it if Judge England would next ask her what part of "Contempt of Court" or "Order to Show Cause" doesn't she understand.

"Using the example of Lance Armstrong, when Armstrong was found to be committing fraud, he was stripped of his titles and individuals who were second in different cycling events, including Tour De France, were pronounced to be winners."

Actually the Tour De France said that there would be no winners declared for the ones that Lance Armstrong won, and that those tours would be left blank.

Dr. Orly is wrong again.

"Similarly, upon adjudication on the merits the issue of Obama's forged IDs and verification that Obama indeed committed fraud and used forged IDs, Obama's electoral win has to be nullified, which makes the second finisher, GOP candidate Mitt Romney, first."

Doesn't work that way. It's almost like she didn't read the Constitution or anything. Or for that matter, her own goddamn brief, BECAUSE SHE GIVES THE PROCEDURE RIGHT ON PAGE FREAKING EIGHT!!!!!

Constitution hell, she didn't even bother to read the flaming pile of taitz she squatted down and dumped on the court!!!! If President Obama was disqualified for whatever reason, they would be swearing in Joe Biden. End of subject.

There is no way, no way in hell this psycho jackass could have passed her naturalization exam, much less her bar exam.

And in closing:

Part of me feels like I should apologize for my rant / open letter to Dr. Orly. While I've been known to get grumpy, I don't usually lose my temper to the point I basically invite someone to go eat a bowl of sugar-frosted, honey-roasted dicks.

But, for all that it's out of line for my usual behaviour, I find I can't bring myself to apologize. Because I meant every single bloody word of it. Dr. Orly has gone way beyond being cute or a laughingstock, and is now a flat out disgrace.

Yes, I know she's more than likely mentally ill. I know she's got more issues than National Geographic. I simply don't care about that anymore. I want her gone. I want her out of our country, I want her pollution to stop. I want it so on 21 January 2017, she wakes up and gets metaphorically smashed over the head by how she has wasted the last eight years. I want her to see the tatters of every professional and personal relationship and reputation that she's sacrificed on the alter of her delusional jihad.

I want her to fully, completely, honestly, and totally understand the price she has paid in pursuit of her psychotic vendetta. And I want her to live the rest of a long, long life, outside of this country, knowing completely and fully what an absolute failure she's been.

Most of all, I simply want her where she can no longer take a massive steaming dump on the Constitution, rule of law, and every principle this country stands for. I want her to stop wiping her ass with the flag while claiming to be "Lady Liberty". She's proven herself to be unworthy of US Citizenship, and I consider her in violation of the oath she took when she naturalized as a US citizen. And as she's broken said oath, I want to see her out of our country.

Comments

[Thomas Brown]

You need never apologize (nor should anyone) for expressing any form of negative opinion about Orly Taitz. She is beneath contempt. Nothing about her suggests a human being dwells within. She would put broken glass in baby food if it would even momentarily slake her burning insatiable hatred for our freely and fairly elected President. She is foul beyond measure; an execrable, wretched harridan. If one could combine Medusa, Countess Bathory, Lucretia Borgia, Hetty Green and Leona Helmsley, the resulting creature would still be more pleasant, competent, honorable and appealing than Orly Taitz.

[SuzieC]

Part of me feels like I should apologize for my rant / open letter to Dr. Orly. While I've been known to get grumpy, I don't usually lose my temper to the point I basically invite someone to go eat a bowl of sugar-frosted, honey-roasted dicks.

DO NOT apologize for your rant. It was awesome. Rant Away. Rant some more. It can never be enough to deal with the evil scumbag that is Orly Taitz.

[Greg Brown]

Patrick, your rant is surprising only in that it took this many years for her to finally drive you to it. You have had way more patience, or forbearance, than most of us would have had. Signed the petition, by the way.

[Shay]

"Why do I get the feeling that Padawan Pauly hasn't had a date or steady relationship in a decade or so??"

I hope his mamma finds out about this and slaps him into the middle of the next milennium.

[Estiveo]

I didn't see a rant in there. Just a frustrated American being frustrated by an un-American whack-job.

[MaryRC]

Congratulations, Patrick! Your open letter to Orly was awesome and no more than she deserves. How much public time and money has this woman squandered over the years? She owes the taxpayers of America an apology and a big check.

[The Magic M]

> I hope his mamma finds out about this and slaps him into the middle of the next milennium.

I suppose he harbours a deep hatred for his mother which caused him to jump on the "only the man counts" bandwagon. I fully expect him to go off the rails if his lawsuit is assigned to a female judge. Is Pauly one of the "wimmin can't legally hold office" peeps as well? I didn't read his entire pile of taitz.

[Donna]

Sorry to be a cynic, but Orly and her husband are wealthy and we all know that wealthy people can do things us "peasants" can't. Like buy US Citizenship or not get charged with murder (a la OJ Simpson).

[Glix]

Righteous rant, Patrick! And Orly so deserves it.

I imagine if her deportation were put to a vote of the real We The People, she'd be on the boat back to elsewhere the next day.

[Greg Brown]

Uh, Donna, point taken, but I think you meant to say "get away with murder." There was that little thing of "the trial of the century."

[democratista]

Patrick...I read it all, but don't comment often. However, you earned it. Not only was the rant very satisfying (and true) but how you got through Padawan Paul's self serving piece of crap is beyond belief. Did he actually say he wasn't allowed to be an Atheist? WTF...

[MTinMO]

Completely agreed with your letter to Orly. You are only saying what many of us want to. She is indeed a blight on everything good about these United States. I'm sick of her wasting taxpayer dollars with her complete BS she infests our courts with. I've signed both petitions- to charge birthers for all the wasted money on their frivolous lawsuits and to deport Orly. I am tired of her getting away with trying to incite people to take up arms against the legal US government (I know those videos are still out there) and I am sick of her constantly harping on our legally elected, natural born US citizen president.

As to the Jedi- I have a serious headache trying to get through that tripe. I would love to be able to tell him where to put his "citizen only through the father" crap. His insanity I think might even take him over Orly's level of BS. Can't we deport him too? He says he isn't part of this country! He sure isn't a tax paying citizen.

PS Patrick- Has something changed that I'm not getting the latest posts in my RSS feed emails? I have been getting them all along, and suddenly the last two haven't come through.

[AC180]

Years of toxic abuse from the birthers/ right wingers is definitely starting to have it's effect.

Orly is just a dishonest disgusting person taking advantage of the millions of disgusting, dishonest people who happily support her. If it wasn't for her, someone else would fill the vacuum and take the limelight. She's nothing special and nothing to be angry about -- Be angry that there are just so many clueless and hateful people out there. Just don't let their venom consume you - You're a great guy and better than that!

[DaveH]

Patrick. I don't know how you managed to wade through the cesspool of birtherism day after day. You deserve some sort of an award for venturing where no sane human has been able to go. It's like you have some sort of super human powers!

[Feinne]

Seriously does he not get that for most of human history it was effectively impossible to know who the father of a child was with certainty but quite easy to know who their mother was?