In today's dispatches, a motion to dismiss in Dr. Orly's Grinols v Everyone+Dog lawsuit. And it looks like the US attorneys office may have just done their homework, as the arguments are a condensed history of birther fail. The Supreme Court releases their decisions, and much to the surprise of nobody in the reality-based community, neither Dr. Orly or Montgomery Sibley got the ponies they wanted.
The failure to be given ponies, curiously enough, cause both Dr. Orly and Montgomery Sibley to release vast amounts of horseshit upon the world at large.
The comments section at Birther Report are their usual frothy mix of hatred, sedition, death threats, and racism as a result of the Supreme Court's decisions, while Dr. Orly tries to blame the decision on those dusky types she saw working for the Supreme Court as clerks. Dr. Orly gets another fail, as the court in Mississippi tells her no default for you! Yes, once again Dr. Orly proves to the world that the last time she got service right was with CEL3.
But wait, the fun continues as Dr. Orly tries to bring her bat guano crazy tripe to the international stage, begging the world to come rescue her from the scary black man. A birther tea party group wants to protect the winner of a legitimate election, causing a mass blowout in national irony meters. Rudy enlists the help of his cat. And Montgomery Sibley demands Congress call him, soon, please?
15 February - Motion to Dismiss in Grinols v Electoral College.
(Scribd link here)
"PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT on March 21, 2013, at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 7, 14th Floor, before the Honorable Morrison C. England, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento Division, federal defendants will and hereby doe move to dismiss plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Federal Defendants’ motion is based upon this Notice of Motion and Motion, the accompanying Memorandum of Points and Authorities, all records in this action and matters of which the Court may take judicial notice, and any argument to be heard by the Court.1"
Footnote 1 suggests they already know what Dr. Orly is going to claim.
"1 The undersigned represents the United States, Congress, and any federal employees and officials named in their official capacity. In addition, the undersigned appears here to “attend to the interests of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. §§ 517, 547. Plaintiffs do not appear to have properly served President Obama in any capacity under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i). According to Plaintiffs’ “Notice of Default. . . Request for an Expedited Default Judgment and a Proposed Default Judgment,” the President was served on January 4, 2013. Docket No. 64. However, plaintiffs’ proofs of service indicate that plaintiffs served only the Department of Justice at 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C., and the United States Attorney’s Office in Sacramento. Docket Nos. 49, 50."
Ouch!
The memo in support of the motion is pretty fun.
(Scribd link here)
The federal case list includes:
Barnett v. Obama,
Berg v. Obama,
Cohen v. Obama,
Drake v. Obama,
Holister v. Soetoro,
Hollander v. McCain,
Hollman v. United States Electoral College,
Kerchner v. Obama,
Robinson v. Bowen,
Sibley v. Alexander,
Sibley v. Obama,
Taitz v. Ruemmler,
Taitz v. Obama.
It's like "K-Tel Presents, greatest birther failures of 2008-20013!"
And just to rub things in, they also include:
United States v. Wong Kim Ark,
Jack Maskell, Cong. Research Serv., R42097, Qualifications for President and the "Natural Born" Citizenship Eligibility Requirement 11-14 (2011),
Jack Maskell & Elizabeth Rybicki, Cong. Research Serv., RL32717, Counting Electoral Votes: An Overview of Procedures at the Joint Session, Including Objections by Members of Congress 2 (2012).
And then down to the memo:
"Plaintiffs – one of whom is currently serving a 210-month sentence for extortion at the Federal Correctional Institution in Texarkana, Texas"
*Chuckle*
"The Amended Complaint lists three candidates for President as plaintiffs – Edward Noonan (alleged to have won the American Independent Party’s presidential primary in California), Thomas Gregory MacLeran (alleged to have been a candidate for President), and Keith Judd (alleged to have been a Democratic Party candidate for President). The Amended Complaint does not allege that any of these candidates were actually on the ballot in any state in the General Election on November 6, 2012. A review of the California Secretary of State’s Statement of Vote for the November 6, 2012 General Election reveals that none of these candidates received a single vote for President in California."
*Snicker*
"Although the Amended Complaint alleges that Edward Noonan was the winner of the American Independent Party primary, an individual by the name of Thomas Hoefling was actually nominated as the American Independent Party’s candidate for President, not Mr. Noonan. "
And it must grate Noonan every time that's brought up.
"The Amended Complaint does not allege with which party Thomas Gregory MacLeran was affiliated, nor does it provide any other details regarding his candidacy for President."
Well, that may be due to the fact that, other than "deport all Muslims and overthrow the Government", he really had no details other than being a courtroom prop for Dr. Orly.
"Although the Amended Complaint alleges that Keith Judd received forty percent of the vote in the West Virginia Democratic Party Primary, Judd is currently serving a prison sentence at the Federal Correctional Institution in Texarkana, Texas, and is not scheduled for release until June 24, 2013."
Which makes campaigning awkward.
"In light of the fact that all of the events leading up to, and including, the President’s inauguration to a second term as President have already occurred, plaintiffs’ claim that Barack Obama is not eligible to run for the Presidency is moot.3 See Sibley v. Alexander, No. 12-cv-1984 (JDB), 2013 WL 76286, at *1 (D.D.C. Jan. 8, 2013) (dismissing as moot an action challenging President Obama’s eligibility to hold office on the ground that plaintiff “sought to enjoin the electors from casting their ballots, which has already occurred”)"
Once again the birthers are their own worst enemy.
"3. To the extent plaintiffs seek to amend their Amended Complaint either explicitly or sub silencio to obtain relief other than that explicitly requested in their Amended Complaint, the United States opposes such amendment. As has previously been explained to plaintiffs’ counsel, with President Obama’s January 20, 2013 inauguration to a second term as President of the United States, any conceivable declaratory or injunctive relief that plaintiffs could now seek would run “not merely against [Barack] Obama as a political candidate but against President Obama, this country’s sitting president . . . [and] the Court would need to wade deep into the waters of the President’s official duties [and] declare that the President could no longer perform any official duties.” Barnett v. Obama, No. 8:09-cv-00082- DOCAN, 2009 WL 3861788, at *11, *13 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2009), aff’d sub. nom. Drake v. Obama, 664 F.3d 774 (9th Cir. 2011), cert. denied, 132 S. Ct. 2748 (2012)."
Once again Dr. Orly is her own worst enemy.
"Lower courts, likewise, have uniformly dismissed for lack of standing challenges to the qualifications of a candidate for President of the United States. See, e.g., Kerchner v. Obama, 669 F. Supp. 2d 477, 483 (D.N.J. 2009) (dismissing for lack of standing a challenge to the President’s eligibility for office because “the injury, if any, suffered by Plaintiffs is one that would be shared by all the American people” and “this generalized harm is not sufficient to establish standing under Article III”), aff’d, 612 F 3d 204 (3d Cir. 2010) (dismissing appeal as frivolous), cert. denied, 131 S. Ct. 663; Berg v. Obama, 574 F. Supp. 2d 509, 518 (E.D. Pa. 2008) (dismissing for lack of standing an action challenging the President’s eligibility for office because “[t]he alleged harm to voters stemming from a presidential candidate’s failure to satisfy the eligibility requirements of the Natural Born Citizen Clause is not concrete or particularized enough to constitute an injury in fact sufficient to satisfy Article III standing”), aff’d, 586 F.3d 234, 239 (3d Cir. 2009); Hollander v. McCain, 566 F. Supp. 2d 63, 68 (D.N.H. 2008) (dismissing for lack of standing a claim that Senator John McCain was not eligible to be President because the alleged ineligibility, even if true, “would adversely affect only the generalized interest of all citizens in constitutional governance, and that is an abstract injury”); Cohen v. Obama, No. 08-2150, 2008 WL 5191864, *1 (D.D.C. Dec. 11, 2008) (dismissing for lack of standing an action seeking to enjoin President Obama from taking the oath of office in 2008 because the claim presented only a generalized grievance); Jones v. Bush, 122 F. Supp. 2d 713, 717 (N.D. Tex. 2000) (dismissing for lack of standing a challenge to the eligibility of George W. Bush and Richard Cheney for President and Vice-President because “plaintiffs conspicuously fail to demonstrate how they, as opposed to the general voting population, will feel its effects”), aff’d without opinion, 244 F.3d 134 (5th Cir. 2000)."
Oh good. Someone did their homework….
"None of these plaintiffs alleges that he was on the ballot in enough states in the 2012 Presidential election to even hope he could gain the requisite 270 electoral votes to win the Presidency. None of these plaintiffs can plausibly argue that he would have been elected President if Barack Obama had not participated in the election process. As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia recently held in affirming the dismissal of a similar challenge to the qualifications of the President brought by a write-in candidate for President:
As the district court said, “self declaration as a write-in candidate” is insufficient, Sibley v. Obama, 866 F. Supp. 2d 17, 20 (D.D.C. 2012),—both because if it were sufficient any citizen could obtain standing (in violation of Article III of the U.S. Constitution) by merely “self declaring,” and because the writ is only available for someone who would obtain the office if the incumbent were ousted, see Newman, 238 U.S. at 544, 547, 550–51.
Sibley v. Obama, 2012 WL 6603088, at *1 (D.C. Cir. Dec. 6, 2012); see also Sibley v. Alexander, No. 12-cv-1984 (JDB), 2013 WL 76286, at *2 (D.D.C. Jan. 8, 2013) (“Sibley’s status as a write-in candidate is insufficient to confer standing because there is no evidence, nor authority, that Sibley points to which would indicate that the electors would otherwise have cast their votes for him”)."
Montgomery Sibley is really the gift that keeps on giving. If it wasn't for the fact he's already disbarred, I'd say he's trying to take the title of "The Worst Attorney in the Universe" away from Dr. Orly.
"E. Plaintiffs’ Claims Lack MeritEven if this Court were to address the substance of plaintiffs’ claims, they are frivolous and have been consistently rejected by every state and federal court that has considered them to date. See, e.g., Drake v. Obama, 664 F.3d 774 (9th Cir. 2011), cert. denied, 132 S. Ct. 2748 (2012); Sibley v. Obama, 866 F. Supp. 2d 17, aff’d, 2012 WL 6603088 (D.C. Cir. Dec. 6, 2012) (per curium); Taitz v. Obama, 707 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2010); Kercher v. Obama, 669 F. Supp. 2d 477 (D.N.J. 2009), aff’d, 612 F.3d 204 (3rd Cir. 2010); Holister v. Soetoro, 601 F. Supp. 2d 179 (D.D.C. 2009); Berg v. Obama, 574 F. Supp. 2d 509 (E.D. Pa. 2008), aff’d, 586 F.3d 234 (3rd Cir. 2009)."
Just to underscore the birther failure parade.
"Moreover, Plaintiffs have not claimed, much less provided any evidence, that President Obama was born anywhere but in the United States, and it is well settled that those born in the United States are considered natural born citizens. See United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 702 (1898); Jack Maskell, Cong. Research Serv., R42097, Qualifications for President and the “Natural Born” Citizenship Eligibility Requirement 11-14 (2011)."
And let's poke the de Vattelists with a sharp stick, shall we??
19 February - The Supreme Court releases their orders.
(PDF here)
"ORDERS IN PENDING CASES
(snip)
12A606 - NOONAN, EDWARD, ET AL. V. BOWEN, CA SEC. OF STATE"
And
"CERTIORARI DENIED
(snip)
12-736 - SIBLEY, MONTGOMERY B. V. OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF U.S., ET AL."
19 February - Supreme Court docket for Noonan v Bowen:
"Feb 19 2013 Application (12A606) denied by the Court. "
19 February - Supreme Court docket for Sibley v Obama:
"Feb 19 2013 Petition DENIED. "
19 February - "Reality Check" makes note of the Supreme Court decision.
"Today the Supreme Court issued a ruling in the Noonan v Bowen case that clears President Obama on claims made by Orly Taitz of identity theft and serving while ineligible to be President. Taitz had used this case to dump mounds of “evidence” upon the court including a last minute supplement brief with an affidavit from another of Taitz’s stable of Keystone-Kops-like amateur sleuths one Albert Hendershot from Alabama. The court found it was not compelling and issued the one line denial just minutes ago.
Taitz’s motion requested that the certification of the electoral votes in California be stayed as well as the certification by Congress. Both event have long since occurred as well as the Inauguration of President Obama."
19 February - SCOTUSblog also makes note of it.
"9:50
Lyle:
In answer to a question, the Court denied a stay in the case of Noonan v. Bowen (12A606), but did not act on any other aspect of that case. "
19 February - Denial, thy name is Orly Taitz (malware and redirect warning)
"02.19.2013 order from the Supreme Court of the United States does not state whether the case was granted or denied, no answer yet, no treason yet by the justices of the Supreme Court. See the order at link below
Posted on | February 19, 2013 "
Funny, the docket says, quite clearly, "denied by the court".
And the "no treason yet" comment is actually quite offensive.
19 February - Birther Report tries to spin the response on Dr. Orly's denial.
"The U.S. Supreme Court in typical fashion denied without comment Dr. Orly Taitz's application for stay for the California electoral challenge Noonan v Bowen. Dr. Taitz sought to strip California's electoral votes from Barack Obama based on his Article II ineligibility, his forged birth certificate, his forged Selective Service, and his Connecticut Social Security Number. Included were Affidavits from DHS Special Agent Stephen Coffman and Debt Collector Albert Hendershot attesting to Obama's identity fraud.
It is reported that the U.S. Supreme Court Law Clerks did not even forward the pleadings to Five of the justices.
And as usual SCOTUS Squatters Sotomayor and Kagan did not recuse themselves. No conflicts of interest there, right?"
"Good morning birtherstan! It's Cranky and Bitter on your morning commute….."
The comments are pretty much a prolonged tantrum.
" Steve Pritchard · 2 hours ago
I'm going to stock up the bunker and go literally underground for four years. Cut myself off from the television and the internet. There is nothing on the horizon to give me hope."
" Ed K · 21 minutes agoactually don't cut the internet, when the govt cuts the internet, thats the signal to lock and load, and turn on the ham radio."
I suspect Ed's neighbors are hoping he keeps his ISP bill paid up.
Not to mention racism and conspiracy theories:
" Joe Mannix · 2 hours ago
The five SCOTUS law clerks that didn't forward Taitz brief to the justices were all African American Obama supporters. Even if they were reprimanded, they did the damage to Taitz case. Her case is over with."
" Ed K · 22 minutes agothey should be strung up first"
Nothing like a good ol' fashioned "ni**er necktie" party like your granddaddy threw eh?? Gotta keep those uppity darkies in line, don't cha know.
Once again, they're not even trying to hide it anymore.
And calls for revolt and violence:
" ★FALCON★ 128p · 2 hours ago
Torches and Pitchforks, folks."
" ThomasThePaine · 42 minutes agoGod only helps those who help themselves: NOTHING is going to change until we storm the Capitol. . ."
" ThomasThePaine · 10 hours ago
It's overdue time to turn Washington DC into a wasteland and put troops on the Potomac."
You really are a keyboard commando, aren't you?? Maybe you and Dealio need to get together for some quality time.
" keymanjim · 2 hours ago
We've tried a first Amendment solution to the problem.
Time to move on to the next Amendment."
" Matt · 5 hours agoSoft targets."
Charming.
"redrock · 6 hours agoSCOTUS SUCKS!
All of these judges are traitors and need to be executed as such with sotero mccain graham rockefeller and the rest of the new world order puppets!"
And today's visit from law enforcement goes to….
19 February - Looks like it's full steam ahead on the "clerks ate my homework excuse". (malware and redirect warning)
"Attorney Orly Taitz continues with the demand for the Judiciary Committee to investigate the fact that 5 out 9 Justices of the Supreme Court never saw the case supposedly heard in conference by the Supreme Court and all 9 never saw the supplemental brief filed with SCOTUS, as 5 original sets of briefs were sent back and all supplemental briefs were sent back and never docketed.
An order by the Supreme Court shows a notation after case 12A712 applications denied, which appear to relate to case 12A606, however evidence shows that the case was not heard at all as 5 out of 9 Justices never even got a packet with pleadings.
There are 7 other cases that are proceeding in other courts.
While a part of those cases might be considered moot, such as stays of certifications, the bulk of the cases is not moot, such as Declaratory Relief and RICO (racketeering) cases."
Some of the Cavity Creeps are cranky.
" Treasonous Basterds
February 19th, 2013 @ 10:08 am
Which 4 Justices heard and denied your case? Are they the liberal ones? Can you contact the Supreme Court and demand that all 9 Justices sign a declaration that they reviewed the case? If they don’t agree to do so, then it can be safely assumed that they are all guilty of treason and high crimes and misdemeanors.
Dr. Taitz, be safe. Aren’t you afraid that you might be thrown into a gulag any day now? How do you deal with all the attempts on your life and still manage not to fear for your safety?"
10. FreemanPaul
February 19th, 2013 @ 10:12 am
This is supposed to be a CONSERVATIVE COURT!!
Why are they ruling against us??
The Conservatives are led by their brains, Anton Scalia. They do what he tells them, especially Thomas.
What is the matter with Scalia??? What is the matter with these so-called conservatives?
We expect that the Obot-Justices will vote against us. But the majority? They are very right wing. Where is their duty? Their courage?
There is something wrong with these so-called conservative justices. There is a screw loose somewhere. Rush better attack them, and soon"
19 February - And in Mississippi, the court tells Dr. Orly "No, you can't have default judgement, not yours".
(Scribd link here)
"Plaintiff Attorney Taitz provides, as proof of service, the affidavit of a process server who affirms that he has served process “upon [the] United States of America, by serving [the] Department of Justice, at 950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C.20530.” Same Day Process Service, Inc. aff., docket no. 54-1. The affidavit states in part:
I, Daniel Williams, swear and affirm that on October 9, 2012 at 1:16 p.m., Idid the following:Served Government Agency by delivering a conformed copy of this 60 B Emergency Motion for Reconsideration of the Motion for Preliminary Injunction Due to Error; Motion to Augment; Reconsider Motion forPreliminary Injunction; Exhibits; First Amended Complaint–Petition for an Emergency Injunction From General Election, PermanentInjunction, Declaratory Relief, Treble Damages in RICO; to DONNA WHITLEY as Mail Clerk & Authorized Agent at 950 Pennsylvania Ave.,NW, Washington, D.C. 20530 of the government agency and informing that person of the contents of the documents. Docket no. 54-1.
This proof of service indicates, at most, that Attorney Taitz has attempted to serve the Attorney General of the United States in Washington, D.C. In addition to theAttorney General, however, Rule 4 requires Attorney Taitz to serve “the United StatesAttorney for the district where the action is brought” and “also send a copy of the summons and of the complaint by registered or certified mail to the agency, corporation,officer, or employee.” Rule 4(i)(2). Attorney Taitz has provided no record evidence to show that she has attempted to serve the United States Attorney in the Southern District of Mississippi or Commissioner Astrue."
So in other words, Dr. Orly screwed up service. Again.
" Plaintiff Attorney Taitz has moved this court to enter a default judgment against defendant Commissioner Astrue. This plaintiff, however, has provided no evidence that she properly served Commissioner Astrue in his official capacity, and has not even alleged that she served Commissioner Astrue in the manner necessary to prosecute an individual capacity lawsuit.
Because Attorney Taitz has failed properly to serve process on defendantCommissioner Astrue as required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this court finds that it lacks personal jurisdiction to enter a default judgment. Accordingly, plaintiff Attorney Taitz’ motion for default judgment [docket no. 87] is denied."
She's not having a good day, is she??
19 February - Add Nathan M. Bickel to the list of butthurt birthers today.
"Even though the Supreme Court justices owe their very lifetime appointment livelihoods to the cherished US Constitutional document, they (apparently) did not deem it necessary to do their job and enforce the Constitution. This Supreme Court had a golden opportunity to rid America of its usurper unconstitutional White House occupier; but, they blew it!
This Court, has in effect, opened the floodgates to Obama’s ever increasing dictatorial rule. Evil days loom ahead for America. Those influential in places of authority have shirked their duties; and because they have failed to responsibly act; they have now ushered in a new era for us all, where the rule of one has replaced the world’s best form of government – a Constitutional Republic.
Those of you who love America had better cherish your old history books. Those books will be the only few historical records to evidence your sweet reminiscing memories, as the Muslim bent Obama regime continues to scrub online Internet traces of his Constitutional illegitimacy."
Paranoid much?
19 February - Add George Miller tvo the whiney butthurt birther brigade.
"The “Emperor has no clothes. The townspeople won’t even look.
No surprise here, they have failed multiple times before to act on the biggest political scandal in history and a huge violation of the Constitution. Clarence Thomas even joked that “we’re avoiding it.” Har-har-har. Not only does Obama violate constitutional presidential eligibility law, but he helped hide via multiple vital document forgeries, of a “birth certificate,” Selective Service registration and stolen Social Security numbers- all well documented, via official and private investigations."
Well, except for that whole problem of having absolutely no credible evidence to support these claims.
19 February - And Birther Report notices Dr. Orly being told "no default, learn to serve someone properly for once, harridan".
" Joe Mannix · 2 hours ago
They are celebrating over at the Fogbow and Dr, Conspiracy's."
I suspect laughing.
" Don't Mention It · 1 hour ago
And at Badfiction too."
Awww. I has a fan.
"Joe Mannix · 2 hours ago
The Judge says:
" Because Attorney Taitz has failed properly to serve process on defendant Commissioner Astrue as required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this court finds that it lacks personal jurisdiction to enter a default judgment"
Why the hell does this woman not know how to properly serve someone according to rules? This is a total embarrassment. Why can't she ASK legal assistance just for clarification to see if she is doing the right procedures? Something isn't right with this situation with her. For 4 years, she had made to many simple mistakes and the result is all these cases thrown out on technicalities. Simple law students do not make these type mistakes."
Yeah, but you forget, she's an on-line law school graduate who's legal incompetence is only surpassed by her arrogance.
" ohhhdear · 2 hours ago
She needs a paralegal."
Yeah, the Dental Chair o' Luv may need another workout.
" Guest · 2 hours agoSo Orly can't be bothered to learn how to properly serve someone… Wow. This is frankly embarrassing and makes her look terrible. Don't we have competent attorney on our side? Where is Berg on this?"
Berg's been off the birther radar of late.
20 February - Communicating with foreign governments to try and in fluence their actions towards the government of the United States? Dr. Orly has that one down, as she sends a letter to Israeli President Shimon Peres. (Malware and redirect warning)
"Dear Mr. Peres,
I understand that recently you decided to reciprocate the Medal of Freedom that was given to you by Mr. Obama and give him a Presidential award of Distinction.
Please, see the attached briefs and documents that show that Mr. Obama is engaged in the most serious crimes of elections fraud and use of forged and stolen IDs for the purpose of the elections fraud."
Oh dear. Dr. Orly seems upset that her other country is planning to honor President Obama.
"Today in the United States of America we reached the level of corruption and lawlessness which resembles Nazi Germany in the 1930s or Stalinist Soviet Union of 1917-1977 or Jihadist Iran today."
You damned un-American traitorous fool. You have the utter gall to prattle on about how you think this country has become like Nazi Germany or the USSR under Stalin, when the very fact you can openly and publicly MAKE such claims without getting a bullet in the head speaks volumes about how utterly, completely, and absolutely wrong you are.
"If World Community does not rise in helping the U.S. citizens in fighting this corruption and criminality in the U.S. Government, Congress and Judiciary, USA will become another NAZI Germany of 1940s."
Let's see. Asking for the help of foreign countries to help overthrow the democratically elected government of the United States. Yep, that's sedition.
Can we revoke this idiot's citizenship now. She's just shown she doesn't deserve it.
"You are planning to give Obama a medal of distinction. The question is: distinction in what? In criminality? In using all forged and stolen IDs? In fraud? In usurpation of the constitutional rights of the U.S. citizens?"
No, more than likely for the items he's actually done, not the things that your nitrous-addled brain thinks he's done.
"You came from a family of well known Rabbis. Would they be proud of you giving a medal to a criminal? For 68 years you were married to your wife Sonia, who fought for justice during WW2 and beyond. Would she be proud of you giving a medal of distinction to a criminal?"
I think the only answer that Dr. Orly deserves at this point is "Stom ta jora, mi iten ve kol a haim shelha ye'afhu le ge'inom aley adamot"
"Obama’s presence in the White House is the biggest embarrassment to this nation. You giving him a presidential award of Distinction will be the biggest embarrassment to the state of Israel."
Yeah, she's really upset that someone she thinks hates Israel is getting an award from the Israeli government.
One could also argue that this letter may be a violation of the Logan Act...
20 February - Over at Obama Ballot Challenge, some interesting news.
Seems that a group called "Respect Arizona" are trying to get signatures on a petition to recall Joe Apraio.
And, rather than let the attempt run its course, the members of the Surprise! (AZ) Tea Party - yeah, that group of birther numbskulls, have started a new group "Citizens to Protect Fair Election Results” (CPFER)"
Now, let's pause a moment to notice the utter irony and hypocrisy of a batch of birthers trying to take action AGAINST someone trying to overturn election results…
Anyway, their goal is to take legal action against Respect Arizona and try and stop their efforts to gather signatures and force a recall. Which may be violation of Arizona's anti-SLAPP laws, but minor picky details.
Oh, and their counsel? Larry Klayman....
"Earlier today, it became known that the STPP – which has teamed with Arpaio on his investigation into President Obama’s birth certificate – was planning legal action to stop the recall effort, which began in the end of January and has four months to collect approximately 500,000 petition signatures. It then became known that they had formed a limited liability company (“LLC”) called Citizens To Protect Fair Election Results, LLC (“CPFER”).
The press conference will be at 2:00pm, and Judicial Watch founder Larry Klaymen will be appearing as a private attorney for CPFER. The media advisory claims that the recall is “illegal and unconstitutional”. It then seems to indicate that the grounds for that claim are “(S)ince Arpaio was only recently reelected to a sixth term on November 6, 2012, Respect Arizona’s petition is not only untimely but fails to set forth any valid grounds for a recall so soon after this election.”
(snip)
If the recall organizers fail to immediately cease and desist from their efforts, the advisory notes that “legal actions will be pursued against Respect Arizona and its officers personally.” (emphasis added) The known officers of Respect Arizona are chair William Fisher and treasurer Robert Unferth."
20 February - Dr. Orly continues to call for the overthrow of the Government. (Malware and redirect warning)
"Do we have one single sheriff or police chief of any town or locality, who would effectuate an arrest of a foreign criminal who usurped the U.S. Presidency with forged and stolen IDs, who would arrest his accomplices in high places who commit high treason?
Posted on | February 20, 2013"
Well, assuming you found someone in law enforcement stupid enough to ignore both law AND the constitution, I strongly suspect that the Secret Service may disagree with the soon-to-be former LEO's attempt.
20 February - Rudy Davis realizes more people would rather look at his cat than listen to his blathering.
So he posts a cute cat video of his cat chasing a cat toy, mixed with birther propaganda.
So basically you have a nearly mindless creature futilely swiping at something he's never going to be able to get. Mixed in with video of a cat.
20 February - More threats for revolt from Dr. Orly, as she reposts his Facebook comment in it's own thread, (which is a bit more than simply allowing it though moderation.) (Malware and redirect warning)
" Benjamin Francis Cooley commented on his video of you.
Benjamin wrote: “It’s not over Kathleen, not by a long shot. It just means peaceful redress has been exhausted. Now comes blood.”"
She's really trying to stir up the hate.
20 February - Dr. Orly's latest bright idea (she seems to be on a roll today). Harass SSA judges and clog their systems with meaningless and false accusations. (Malware and redirect warning)
" Please, fill out the SSA fraud reports and sent them to each and every administrative SSA judge around the country, SSA and local law enforcement
Posted on | February 20, 2013"
*Rolls eyes* Hopefully anyone stupid enough to pull this stunt gets dinged for filing false statements.
20 February - Disbarred attorney Montgomery Sibley takes his Supreme Court denial about as well as Dr. Orly took hers.
" Accordingly, upon the above-cited historical and legislative authority, on January 12, 2012, I properly “requested” Ronald C. Machen Jr., the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, to inform the Grand Jury that Barack Hussein Obama, II may have violated a Federal criminal law, to wit, 18 U.S.C. §1343, “Fraud by wire, radio, or television”. Receiving no response from Mr. Machen, I then filed suit in the U.S. District Court against him seeking a court order to compel Mr. Machen to present my evidence to the Grand Jury.
In response, the District Court held that: “18 U.S.C. §3332 cannot be enforced by private individuals.” This stunning response apparently grafted on to §3332 a requirement that only government officials can invoke §3332 – something that is asinine when government officials are the subject of the alleged criminal offense. I properly took an appeal of this issue to the D.C. Circuit Court which – refusing to me both briefing and oral argument – summarily affirmed the District Court’s order. I then timely filed a Petition for Certiorari to the United States Supreme Court which on February 15, 2013, denied my Petition thus confirmed a new rule that 18 U.S.C. §3332 no longer is the law of this Nation. See: U.S. Supreme Court Case #: 12-736.
Thus my task is done, for I can do no more, and yours – upon your oath of office – has just begun. Will you stand by and allow this usurpation of the fundamental and statutory right of the People to petition a Grand Jury to investigate criminal behavior be deleted by the Executive and Judicial cabal? Or, instead will you promptly address this grotesque affront to the Congressional authority to make the law and see it enforced as written? I trust the latter will be your course and will pray for this Republic’s future if you chose instead the former."
Oh, and he's fully willing and ready to be a complete attention whore.
"I am of course available to speak to these matters in greater detail and provide the referenced documents."
Of corse you are….
20 February - And Birther Report reacts to Sibley's latest.
" Adrian 127p · 2 hours ago
After four solid years of losses I'm beginning to sense a pattern."
Unless the pattern you're starting to sense says "you're in the wrong!", then you've got a lot longer to go.
Oh look, birther revisionism history.
" JacksonPearson 133p · 1 hour ago"After four solid years of losses I'm beginning to sense a pattern."
Yes, the pattern you're sensing is called "Judicial Tyranny."
Judicial tyranny goes against the very grains of the foundation of our country, of which was found in the first sentence and lines of the Preamble to the Constitution: "We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote …" (Bold emphasis added)Understand, that the "Grand jury" clause within the Fifth Amendment was stolen and usurped by the SCOTUS in 1944, when they wrote and adopted the "Federal Rules of Criminal Procedures." Whereas only a court can impanel, and/or the USDOJ can call a federal grand jury to hear charges.
Here:
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp
http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_6And then ironically, read this article: http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1992-05-05/new…
For the very reasons as posted above, the DC Circuit, under judge Royce Lambreth literally put the "American Grand Jury" out of business with his ruling against them. The "American Grand Jury" followed the Constitution to a T, only to find out, that they no longer were self empowered, because the court took jurisdiction over that clause of the Fifth Amendment, without a Constitutional Amendment, and haven't stopped laughing since."
Actually the Fantasy Tiddlywinks League continued for a while after that, but they never could quite understand or accept that they never had any legal authority to speak of.
Oh, and more calls to break the law.
" Guest · 1 hour ago
Going through the Court system seems to have once again, hit a dead end.
What we need, is a hacker, Anonymous or Wikileaks, to hack the Hawaiian Dept of Health, the SS Department, etc.
If it's good enough for the DemonRats, it's good enough for me."
"Matt · 1 hour agoSomeone will have to be water boarded in order for the info needed to come out. WIth threats form the left, water boarding might not even work. So the only way to win this thing will be to do something that they would never ever think people would do. Of course this would mean breaking the (their) laws. I for one can say jury nullification would help. I would never find anyone guilty of any crime against this fraudulent regime. Even if I was sitting on a jury for the crime of someone late term aborting any one of these traitors in DC and claiming self defense of our country, I would not convict."
Not to mention outright threats of death and violence.
" ThomasThePaine · 1 hour ago
Only a sufficient number patriots with .50 Barrett on strategically located rooftops can produce the needed results."
And today's visit from law enforcement goes to…..
For some reason I sense that "Treasonous Basterds" is posting with tongue firmly in cheek.
Posted by: Shay | February 20, 2013 at 08:42 PM
> Although the Amended Complaint alleges that Keith Judd received forty percent of the vote in the West Virginia Democratic Party Primary, Judd is currently serving a prison sentence
It would actually be funny if someone were elected President who is still serving a sentence. ;)
Posted by: The Magic M | February 21, 2013 at 03:00 AM
Patrick, I was waiting for your comments on the SCOTUS decision to bat Orly aside. You didn't disappoint me. ;)
"Rush better attack them, and soon"
Typical birther, expecting everyone else to do the heavy lifting. "Man the barricades! Won't someone pleeeeease man the barricades?"
Posted by: MaryRC | February 21, 2013 at 07:09 PM
When is douchebag, asshat Carl Swenson going to announce? With the massive support of the voters in RW Georgia concerned with the legitimacy of the President, it should be a milk run for a birther.
This is your big chance, Carl, to make a statement--don't let the faithful down. Don't leave it all to Orly.
Posted by: joeymac | February 22, 2013 at 07:26 AM
That describes Rudy purrfectly!
Posted by: Reality Check | February 22, 2013 at 07:36 AM