In today's dispatches, Dr. Orly tries to resurrect the corpse of Taitz v Astrue, and once again shows her complete inability to understand how subpoenas work. We have an interesting legal theory that's going to have seabirds working overtime in guano production. Meanwhile, Dr. Orly is getting both more conspiracy minded AND paranoid.
Cody Judy manages to put two and two together in a way (sarcasm) that's Not At All Racist Or Sore Losery, Honest. (/sarcasm) Birther Report is down to "accepting known crank paranoids as source" levels. Want a job that will sap your will to live?? The White House pokes fun at birthers. Birthers have a collective snit fit. Dr. Orly shows she's as ignorant on economics as she is the law.
Looks like his Navy uniform isn't the only thing Walter Fitzpatrick has disgraced. Linda Jordan goes on an extended whine on how it's unfair she has to pay the Washington State taxpayers back for her birther ballot jihad, hooking up with a former judge with a shady history in her quest to waste more taxpayer money. And Dr. Orly signals that her reply to an Order to Show Cause is gonna be a doozy.
29 January - Showing once again her ability to put two and two together and come up with pancake, Dr. Orly submits a "motion for reconsideration" in her long-dead "Taitz v Astrue" case. (which was denied at the district court and appeals level)
01/29/2013 MOTION filed [STYLED AS "MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION DUE TO NEW EVIDENCE AND NEW DECISIONS"]  by Orly Taitz to recall mandate (Response to Motion served by mail due on 02/11/2013) [Service Date: 01/28/2013 by US Mail] Pages: 11-15 with attachments. [11-5304]
(Scribd link here)
The thing is 118 pages, of which the first 14 are the actual motion and the rest are her usual steaming pile of rapidly fading "exhibits", some dating back to 2009. As for the motion itself, the logic seems to be that the court granted an appeal against the National Labor Relations Board, therefore they should grant her an appeal and a reconsideration right this minute and give her everything she wants. And a pony. Who farts glitter.
"Now, there is an inconceivable dichotomy. How can this court justify its’ actions in holding an oral argument and writing a 47 page opinion in upholding the Constitution on a relatively minor issue of finding a couple of recess appointments of Obama to be unconstitutional, but on the other hand covering up Barack Obama’s identity fraud, his use of a stolen Social Security number from a state where he never resided and hence covering up the fact that Obama is not eligible for the U.S. Presidency at all, which makes all of his appointments unconstitutional and makes all of his orders and decrees unconstitutional and unlawful?"
Simple. One deals with the Constitutional authority of the President to make appointments. The other deals with a series of conspiracy claims, long debunked myths, false statements and outright lies, and a complete disregard for facts or reality.
"Appellant Taitz brings forward additional, new information which shows that the reconsideration of the prior decision is warranted, that it is in the public interest and not addressing this issue by this court would represent flagrant treason on the part of this court and complicity by this court as an accomplice after the fact to the most serious crime ever committed against the United States of America and “We the People” of the United States of America…"
Ah, she back to telling the judges they're committing treason if they don't do her bidding.
"Multiple individuals ran E-verify and SSNVS, official Social Security Administration verification web sites and found that the Social Security number used by Obama in his tax returns, while residing in the White House was not assigned to him…"
Funny how she fails to tell the court those individuals used those systems illegally…..
"…he could not pass e-verify or SSNVS and was not eligible to pick tomatoes or clean toilets in the United States, never mind be a President"
"Alex, I'll pick 'racist dog whistles' for $400."
"Taitz provided this court with the sworn affidavit on Linda Jordan and attached E-Verify printout, which was obtained by her (Exhibit 2) and an e-mail from Colonel Gregory Hollister with an attached SSNVS printout obtained by him (Exhibit 3), which showed Obama using a Social Security number not attached to him."
Mind you, she didn't mention the fact that both accessed and used the systems illegally, and Hollister even got a visit from the authorities for his falsely changing the President's Selective Service address……
Ah, rules, laws, Dr. Orly cares not for those things.
"When an individual is deceased or the number does not match the databases, one would get a numident and the Social Security SS-5 application. Such information was received for the Social Security number (redacted), which is immediately preceding the number Obama is illegally using. (redacted) was assigned to now deceased Thomas Wood and it does not need to be redacted. "
What part of ALL SSN numbers need to be redacted is she not getting?? All this is, is a sneaky way she's using to try and get around the order from the court to redact President Obama's old SSN.
I know the court won't do it, but could we PLEASE see her lying, un-American ass SANCTIONED for this kind of crap???
"What is clear, is that Obama would not be so arrogant, as to use the Social Security number, which belongs to the mother of the Chief Actuary of the Social Security without that actuary knowing about it and being complicit, therefore it is logical to believe that Harry C. Ballantyne was that high ranked official within the Social Security, who aided and abetted Obama in getting those numbers and changing the databases."
What is clear is that Dr. Orly has taken a complete swan drive right into the deep end of Lake Conspiracy.
"The main difference between Watergate and ObamaForgeryGate is that in 1973-1974 we had some judges with some measure of honesty, integrity and moral values, we had Judge Sirica, who ordered release of the Watergate tapes. Today we are yet to find one honest judge, who would hear on the merits this crime of the century and possibly the biggest crime in the history if this nation."
I would dearly love to see her hit with an order to show cause as to why she shouldn't be hit with a contempt of court charge for this kind of crap.
"Obama is acting with a breathtaking arrogance. He is behaving as if every American is a complete idiot and as if he has each and every judge on the take."
Basically, "How DARE that uppity dark muzzie DARE act like he's the President!! Who does he think he is?? SCREECH!!"
29 January - Oooooookay then
"Can the Peach family claim Nectarines belong to it? Or does the Plum family own that right? Of course it’s neither. Nectarines are a combination of both, being a hybrid that belongs to neither group.
Can Murray the Mule be called a natural horse because his father was a horse? Or can he be called a natural donkey because his mother was a donkey? Since he is neither of those two he can’t be called by those labels. One can say that he is neither of the two or that he is both, sharing the nature of both, but one can’t say that he is a natural member of either group because natural horses do not have donkey mothers, nor do natural donkeys have horse fathers. Instead he is something else. Something different.
So, cutting to the chase, is Barack Obama a natural Negro or a natural Caucasian? More importantly is he a natural Kenyan or a natural American? Or is he neither because he is a hybrid combination of the two, resulting in something different and not natural at all?
Is there such a thing as a natural group of Kenyan-Americans? Are any hybrid creatures or hybrid people natural members of any group? How can they be natural members when there is no such natural group to which they could belong?
There is no such thing as a natural mule group because mules are sterile and unable to produce group members.
Similarly, there is no such thing as a natural Kenyan-American group which can reproduce members because their off-spring will be a members of legal groups, -not a natural group . Kenya does not, or did not, allow dual-citizenship, -just as the United States for over a century (from its inception) did not allow dual-citizenship.
Kenyan hybrids born abroad, (like Obama Jr.) at the age of adulthood must swear sole and undivided allegiance to Kenya or their citizenship (provisional) expires."
And it gets better:
"So, being as Obama Jr. is not and can never be a natural American since natural Americans, like horses and donkeys, only have parents with the same nature, whether biological or political, and nationality hybrids are no more natural than mules, he is therefore an unconstitutional charlatan illegitimately sworn in and occupying the office of the President in direct and open violation of the United States Constitution."
As for the 14th Amendment, well, that supposedly only applies to immigrants:
"Clearly it is a travesty that a non-natural presumed American citizen is knowingly, subversively, and autocratically in hypocritical and on-going violation of our Constitution, but it’s even worse than that because he is not a legitimate hybrid-citizen of the U.S. since by U.S. statutes he was not even an American at all via birth within U.S. borders (since his father was not an immigrant) but he also was not an American via his mother because the laws of the last century that grant U.S. citizenship to children of American mothers only pertains to children born outside of the United States, -in foreign nations.
So if he wasn’t born with traditional natural citizenship via American parents, nor did he obtain hybrid dual-citizenship through native-birth to an immigrant father, nor provisional citizenship via foreign birth to an American mother, nor naturalized citizenship as an adult, then exactly what is the nature of his supposed citizenship? It is citizenship that federal policy presumes to exist based solely on the force of the simplictic opinion rendered by the unelected A.G. in 1898 and which carried only the tenuous authority of the executive branch even though it does not comport with anything ever passed by the United States Congress nor “settled” by the Supreme Court.
In other words, he is presumed to be an American solely because of one man’s opinion, -an opinion which failed to provide any guidelines as to what its limits were. Barack Obama (and his Attorney General) possess the authority to declare himself to not be an American citizen due to lack of any controlling legal authority that constitutionally, legislatively, or judicially grants him that status.
Congress lacks the constitutional authority to legislate citizenship law over any but those born with an American parent and a foreign parent outside of the United States, as well as those who wish to undergo naturalization. It also lacks any authority to control immigration, which constitutionally remains a state matter since it is not even mentioned in the Constitution. The 14th Amendment of 1868 bestowed citizenship rights to all born in the U.S. who are born subject to full federal authority, meaning the children and descentants of imported slaves. The Supreme Court in the 1898 Wong case then extended the meaning of the Amendment to include children of immigrants, but nothing in legislative nor judicial history has extended citizenship to children of foreign visitors even if born on U.S. soil."
This is getting into Padawan Paul Guthrie levels of insanity here.
"American mothers can only pass their citizenship to children of a foreign father if they are born abroad, assumedly in his country. That is the only provision in U.S. law by which a mother’s citizenship is inherited by her children. Congress never thought about the situation of a domestic birth because the assumption was held by all that mere birth in the U.S. conferred citizenship, but that is a completely erroneous and ignorant view based on the universal assumption that the interpretation of the Attorney General’s opinion in 1898 got it right."
Wow. Shades of Padawan Pauly's "Sacred Sperm of Citizenship" theory!!
30 January - Once again, Dr. Orly completely and totally misunderstands how subpoenas work, as she places a request in her Grinols v Electoral college for a default judgement against President Obama .
(Scribd link here) (25 pages)
"Case at hand was file on 12.12.2012. Defendant BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, AKA BARACK (BARRY) SOETORO, AKA BARACK (BARRY) OBAMA SOEBARKAH was sued in his capacity as a candidate for the U.S. President. Defendant was served by Same Day professional service processer on 01. 04.2013. Defendant was under an obligation to file an answer or a responsive pleading within 21 days on 01.25.2013. Defendant failed to file an answer or a responsive pleading and is currently in DEFAULT."
Now, bear in mind that this is the same "service" that she told the judge on 3 January had been done, honest, no really, swear to God. And then submitted proof that service had actually been done on 4 January. The same one that the judge pointed out that she HAD lied to him about.
Then there's the slight problem of 30 days between the date of service and when the person subpoenaed has to respond. (60 days for federal agencies and employees in their official capacity.) She's stating she gave President Obama 21 days.
Finally, that time limit is completely dependent on if service had been done correctly - which in this case it had not.
Somehow I suspect the judge isn't going to be impressed.
"Plaintiffs are hereby respectfully requesting a default judgment against the defendant, post judgment discovery, costs and attorney fees."
And a pony.
"Additionally, Plaintiffs are seeking an EXPEDITED DEFAULT JUDGMENT for the following reason:"
This is at this point you get the distinct impression that Dr. Orly has been copulating with a Planter's can (h/t to Mike Dunford). Because the reason Dr. Orly gives is that the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, one Michael Astrue, is stepping down, and Dr. Orly is convinced, convinced mind you, that anybody President Obama appoints is going to *gasp* destroy the records! Her proof of this??
Well, for starters she cites "Obama Hustle" blogger Al Hendershot (you know, the same one who though Nellie Risvadt was an authority). Seems he's been playing in the Acxiom.com database and found supposed proof that President Obama is using the Social Security Number of one Harry J. Borunel, based on changes made to the database around November of 2009.
"Acxciom-batch solutions showed (Exhibit 1) that Harcy J Bounel with the same Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 at 5046 S Greenwood Ave in Chicago, home address of Barack Obama, Database shows Bounel with the same address and Social Security number as Barack Obama himself. According to the databases last changes to the information on Harrison (Harry) J Bounel were made in and around November 2009 by Michelle Obama, who is listed as Bounel's relative. Database changes can involve entering the information or deletion of information. It appears changes that made by relative Michelle Obama included deletion of information, which was done at a time when Taitz brought to Federal court in the Central District of California before Judge David O. Carter a case of election challenge by her client, former U.S. ambassador Dr. Alan Keyes and 40 state Representatives and high ranked members of the U.S. military."
Which would have been about the point that Dr. Orly started to spam President Obama's old social security number all over the freaking internet. For those of us in the reality-based community, it looks simple. Some idiot (namely Dr. Orly Taitz) spews a social security number all over the internet. Identity thief picks it up, uses other publically-available info to pull scam, said scam ends up in database.
She then goes on to claim that the former director of the Selective Service stepped down after he was confronted with evidence of forgery, and repeats the "destroyed evidence claims of Pam Barnett, Jerome Corsi, and Montgomery Sibley, which in her nitrous addled brain means that the information is being hidden right this very minute and therefore she needs discovery at once. And a pony.
The proposed order is extra special.
"3. Plaintiffs provided this court with the copy of the School registration of the Defendant from the Assissi School in Jakarta, lndonesia, where his citizenship is listed as lndonesian. Defendant failed to provide any evidence of Change of Citizenship from lndonesian to American."
Plaintiff failed to provide any actual evidence of change of citizenship TO Indonesian in the first place. And it's not "American" it's "U.S, Citizenship".
Not to mention, (as the birthers have been told over and over and over again since fall of 2008), that a minor US citizen child cannot renounce their US citizenship, and Barack Obama was too old under Indonesian law to be granted Indonesian citizenship.
"Even if he were to legally relinquish his Indonesian citizenship to American upon his arrival from Indonesia in 1971, he would be a Naturalized Citizen and not Natural born as required by the Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution."
Again, there is no way a US citizen minor can lose or renounce their US citizenship. However. there is a law about regaining US citizenship:
8 USC § 1435 - Former citizens regaining citizenship (Bold face mine)
"(d) Persons losing citizenship for failure to meet physical presence retention requirement
(1) A person who was a citizen of the United States at birth and lost such citizenship for failure to meet the physical presence retention requirements under section 1401 (b) of this title (as in effect before October 10, 1978), shall, from and after taking the oath of allegiance required by section 1448 of this title be a citizen of the United States and have the status of a citizen of the United States by birth, without filing an application for naturalization, and notwithstanding any of the other provisions of this subchapter except the provisions of section 1424 of this title. Nothing in this subsection or any other provision of law shall be construed as conferring United States citizenship retroactively upon such person during any period in which such person was not a citizen."
So guess what? Even if he HAD lost US citizenship (which is against US law), then under US law, the citizenship would have been regranted AS IF IT HAD NEVER BEEN LOST.
Once again, Dr. Orly fails to understand the law.
She ends her proposed order with a request that the court forward it's findings:
"…to the Chairman of the Judiciary Commission of the U.S. Congress for determination whether the Articles of impeachment against Defendant BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, AKA BARACK (BARRY) SOETORO, AKA BARACK (BARRY) OBAMA SOEBARKAH are justified."
And asks the court to make:
"…a finding and Declaratory ruling that Defendant BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, AKA BARACK (BARRY) SOETORO, AKA BARACK (BARRY) OBAMA SOEBARKAH was not eligible to the position of the U.S. President and Commander in Chief as he is a citizen of Indonesia, who for the U.S. Presidency based on fraud and misrepresentation and using either forged or fraudulently obtained identification papers."
As for the exhibits:
Exhibit 1 is the Acxiom.com database info. Which looks like I suspected, someone nabbed the SSN Dr. Orly spammed on the internet and tried to pull some hanky-panky with it. (I'll also note that the ONLY appearance of the Bounel name with that SSN is November of 2009.)
Exhibit 2 is a 1940 census page.
Exhibit 3 is the "emergency motion" by Montgomery Sibley in Sibley v Alexander. Dr. Orly fails to note to the court that this was denied.
Even by the usual standards of the steaming piles of taitz that Dr. Orly routinely squats out and wipes on the court, this is completely bat-guano.
31 January - Dr. Orly is getting quite paranoid. (malware and redirect warning)
"Obots hijacked the e-mail accounts of most of my supporters and investigators. This is an additional charge for the RICO complaint
Posted on | January 31, 2013"
Mind you, she offers absolutely NO proof of any of this, simply the above statement. However, I might suggest that part of any problem her cavity creeps and fellow travelers may be having, could stem from her malware-infested site and her habit of posting her supporters and fellow birtherstanis' email addresses and other personal data, making them prime targets for identity theft and fraud.
31 January - Might I point out some useful pages at Rational Wiki
1 February - Cody Judy's latest load of dingo droppings:
In a nutshell, police in Salt Lake City arrested one Furat Awel Hussain on charges of forgery and identity fraud. Which causes Cody Judy to ask:
"Why are Federal Secret Service Agents investigating a man whose name resembles the biggest fraud and forgery case in American history?"
"Resembles" in so far as they both have variants of the name "Hussein" in them. Otherwise, no resemblance.
Which causes him to springboard to:
"This raises a big question however about Obama's commitment as well as law enforcement's commitment all over the country to, "everyone following the same rules" and being held to the same degree of the law. As it stands now the guy whose name resembles Barack Hussein Obama's who was caught in Salt Lake City is being charged with 35 counts so far.
If the law was equal Barack Hussein Obama would be charged with fraud for every single vote placed for him in the 2012 election which would amount to 60,193,076 counts of fraud. Of course this fraud is connected to money also with every contributions to a candidate who is not qualified as a natural born citizen for the office of the president, every dollar was given under an assumption that is false.
This is why the case in Salt Lake City, Utah of the guy whose name resembles Barack Hussein Obama, whose name is Furat Awel Hussain should at the very least be given a pardon by Barack Hussein Obama immediately, or why the Selective Service Agency should not bother prosecuting another case of fraud or forgery. Barack Hussein Obama's exploits in the manner rising to the office in the White House as a usurper have effectively put to rest or mooted any other charges filed against any other person in fairness under the law.
If I were apart of Furat Awel Hussain legal team, I would plead innocent claiming their is no law against such activity as Barack Hussein Obama has got away with it and the Secret Service is not interested in prosecuting any such activity against Barack Hussein Obama whose crimes far exceed 35 counts of fraud and forgery to the tune of over 60 million."
So basically his argument is "someone with a Muslim sounding name committed forgery and identity fraud, therefore that scary man in the WHITE House with a Muslim sounding name is guilty of forgery and identity fraud, and the police in Salt Lake City should let the person there go free because they haven't gone after the scary black president."
"That is why I as a natural born citizen - born in the United States to two Citizens - having run a race with Barack Hussein Obama have felt that the United States Supreme Court has let me down and held me to a standard that they didn't hold Barack Hussein Obama to."
Bitter, party of one.
"I ran the race in 2012 as a qualified candidate and Barack Hussein Obama did not. In deed in spite of the accomplishments of Lance Armstrong in winning so many prestigious races when it was found that he had not competed fairly with the other racers, the Administrations responsible for over seeing those races ensuring fairness and equality stripped him of all of his titles."
You ran the race? Really? What ballots were you on?? Because you weren't on the General Election ballot even in your own home state
1 February - Birther Report is thrilled to hear that a "well respected journalist and political activist" has announced that President Obama has been indicted by a Federal Court.
The fact that the "well respected journalist and political activist" a) doesn't say on what charges, and b) is Lyndon LaRouche, fails to make an impression that the source may be less than accurate. The fact that Birther Report is willing to pimp claims by a known anti-semite and racist like LaRouche speaks volumes.
1 February - Paralegal looking for a job in Orange County, California? Don't mind working for a raving lunatic who more than likely has less legal knowledge then you? Don't mind having having a stain on your resume? Do I have a job for you!
"Anyone want to help lawyer/dentist/real estate saleslady/BSN Orly Taitz of Rancho Santa Margarita continue to clog courts across America with racist/partisan/unfounded/BSN litigation against the country's twice popularly elected president?
Well, then, you may be in luck.
Check out this ad a Navel Gazing reader plucked from craigslist:"
2 February - The White House pokes some fun at the birthers.
Attn skeet birthers. Make our day - let the photoshop conspiracies begin! m.flickr.com/photos/whiteho…— David Plouffe (@davidplouffe) February 2, 2013
2 February - Confronted with the image of the scary black man with a gun and the White House making fun of the birthers in the process, Birther Report goes ape-dump.
"It is not OK to Photoshop a public photograph, paid for by the American taxpayer, however, you can Photoshop a birth certificate, or two, and usurp the presidency of the United States with no trouble at all. Welcome to Obama's America!"
And in comments:
" CTpatriot · 1 day ago
how about a pic of him deep throating the shotgun, I'm sure he has done a double barrel at Man Country. While dancing on a pepperoni pizza would make it priceless."
2 February - I see that Dr. Orly's bad ideas aren't only limited to birtherism (malware and redirect warning)
"The parasytes live a better life than people, whose blod they suck! It has to end, tell congress: replace wellfare with workfare.
Posted on | February 2, 2013 "
Says the woman who lives in a multi-million dollar house, with a millionaire husband, and sons that are going to very expensive private collages and universities.
"One of the most important issues that is a must for the GOP or any decent American, is to end the welfare system and replace it with workfare. The Congress has to stop incurring debt. We have 23 million people who are either unemployed or under employed, 12million unemployed. The whole federal government employs 2.6 million people.
It is time to cut the federal budget by cutting most federal jobs and giving those jobs to people who are unemployed as part of the workfare program. "
So you want to put 2.6 million professionals out of work to free up their spaces for 2.6 million unemployed with varying skill sets??
Mind you, I tend to like ideas that encourage those on assistance who are willing to work, to find work., And I do think that those who can work should do some work for it. But this seems like a great way to make things worse across the board.
"Most of federal and state jobs should be reserved for the workfare. For example: why are we paying a full salary and benefits to a secretary who works for the federal government and additional $2,000 per month in unemployment and benefits to someone sitting on welfare for two years and watching our main stream media garbage on TV all day long?"
Because that secretary is a talented and experienced professional??
"limit federal student loans to only loans to less expensive state universities and to the majors, where there is a need for college graduates, such as computer science, acounting, engineering. We have billions of unpaid loans which were paid to expensive private universities for people to study worthless degrees"
My how….elitist. Sounds a lot like "keep the riffraff out of the schools my children attend, and don't give people a chance to better themselves or get above themselves."
2 February - Walter Fitzpatrick tells professional seditionist Sharon Rondeau that the Boy Scouts better not change their policy towards scouts who may be gay, or else.
"In an interview with Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III on Thursday evening, he told The Post & Email that a scouting professional at the Boy Scouts of America (BSA) national headquarters revealed the reason that the organization is considering changing its longstanding policy of disallowing homosexuals from membership. "
Well, I would say that it's because it's the right thing to do to make Scouting more inclusive, to make the ideals of Scouting more widely available, to get away from a dictate that's tarnishing the reputation of the Boy Scouts of America, and to bring the Boy Scouts of America more in line with Scouting organizations around the world. (Note, the Girl Scouts of America have no rules barring girl scouts who are gay or atheist, and seem to be doing just fine).
Basically, the Boy Scout of America policy on gays in Scouting are hurting the organization, and going against the ideals of Scouting that Lord Baden-Powell taught.
"Fitzpatrick contacted the national headquarters on Tuesday after learning of the Scouts’ decision to review its stance. Fitzpatrick is an Eagle Scout from Troop 508 in Miners Oaks, CA in 1969. "
So Walter Fitzpatrick has not only tarnished his former military uniform, but his Eagle Scout award. I see.
"UPS and other companies have recently withdrawn funding from the Boy Scouts because of its policy on homosexuals. “There’s speculation that the Boy Scouts are hurting for money, but I was told today that it’s not about money,” Fitzpatrick told us.
The impetus for the possible change is that some churches which currently sponsor Boy Scout councils have said that they will not continue their support unless the Scouts change their stance on homosexuals.
“Chartering organizations such as churches are saying, ‘We as a church, in our present-day canons, accept gays. Didn’t Christ say that all people should embrace?’ So it’s churches which are pressuring the Boy Scouts to change with a ‘religious’ argument. They’re saying, ‘If we are accepting gays in the church, how can we sponsor an organization that doesn’t?’” Fitzpatrick told us, who spoke with the scouting professional for approximately 90 minutes on Thursday. "
That's not surprising. As Churches are getting more inclusive, they're re-evaluating their stance with Boy Scouts of America and if what the Boy Scouts teach matches what the church teaches.
The Boy Scouts of America had a problem with one of the churches that was affiliated with them from their beginnings - the Unitarian-Universalist church, to the point that BSA removed the UU religious badge from their religion in scouting programme because the UU church wouldn't back down in what they taught their youth about gays and lesbians. In effect, the BSA tried to dictate dogma to a church. The problem people like Fitzpatrick are having is that more churches are being inclusive rather than exclusive.
"So there are two aspects to this. Some churches are saying that “duty to God” means that the Scouts have to embrace homosexuals. The other aspect to the Scout law is the moral aspect, and I told the professional that that is where the Scouts have to draw the line because homosexuality is immoral. "
In your own opinion Walter Fitzpatrick. There's a lot of people, ministers and lay people, gay and straight. who completely disagree with you.
"I told my contact that if the Scouts make this change, I am going to send my Eagle Scout medal and certificate back to him or her directly. I said, “If you make this change, I renounce the Boy Scouts. If you make this change, this will be your end. Take this to your leadership tonight and tell them that it is not a religious argument. Some churches and the Boy Scouts can still agree on the moral issue so that the Boy Scouts can say, “Thank you, but no thank you.”
Hmmm… Let's see. If I remember correctly, the Scout Law has things like:
"A Scout is Trustworthy.
A Scout is Loyal.
A Scout is Helpful.
A Scout is Friendly.
A Scout is Courteous.
A Scout is Kind.
A Scout is Obedient.
A Scout is Cheerful.
A Scout is Thrifty.
A Scout is Brave.
A Scout is Clean.
A Scout is Reverent."
Let's compare that to Walter Fitzpatrick, to lies to other people and himself, has shown a disloyalty to his country, his friends, and his shipmates, who attacks and belittles people who he disagrees and makes up outrageous conspiracy theories about. Who has been arrested on domestic violence charges, disobeyed the law and lawful orders, who has stolen from his shipmates, stolen legal documents, and committed credit card fraud, and who went on a strike in prison where he refused to shower or perform normal hygiene.
Well, IMHO you've completely dishonored your Eagle Badge. So sure, send it back, since you've pretty much wiped your ass on it anyway.
"When a church sponsors a Boy Scout troop, that’s where the troop actually meets. When an American Legion post sponsors them, they meet at the American Legion. They can weigh in and change this position overnight by saying, “Forget about the church part of it; we’ll sponsor you.”
It’s not about money; it’s about the churches trying to change the Boy Scouts. Secular organizations can just as well sponsor them who support their position. "
Even more secular sponsors are against the current ban than the churches are. As for the American Legion, while the organization did back "Don't Ask - Don't Tell", they also have a GLBT-friendly post in San Francisco. And other posts had non-discrimination policies in place as well.
So Walter Fitzpatrick is not only a bully, a thief, a domestic abuser, a cheat, and a bigot, but he's a raging homophobe as well. Good to know.
"Editor’s Note: The Post & Email bears no ill will to any person of any creed, religious belief, race, nationality, or sexual orientation. We do, however, respect the right of any organization to uphold its moral principles and beliefs without fear of retribution or political backlash."
Says the blog who over the last several years have continued to post and endorse racist and bigoted diatribes against minorities, Muslims, and pretty much anyone else you don't like.
What's amazing is that they never seem to see their own hypocrisy.
3 February - Carl Gallups allows Linda Jordan to go on an extended whine over her illegal use of E-Verify and having to pay almost $13,000 in attorney costs for her Washington State Birther Ballot Jihad.
Linda Jordan broke the law and then wasted Washington State taxpayer money trying to claim that illegally-obtained information was somehow valid. I'm not overly impressed with her "woe is me" martyr approach.
3 February - And how do the inmates at Birther Report react to Linda Jordan's whine?
" ★FALCON★ 127p · 1 day ago
Linda Jordan Talks Sanctions For Challenging Obama's Identity Fraud
Taking this fraud on exposes the Democrats, the GOP, the Judges, the SCYTL voter fraud, and the Globalists willing to destroy America and her rightful citizens.
This is a fight for the long end of a gun."
" JacksonPearson 132p · 16 hours ago
And conspiracy insanity:
" julio schwartz · 1 day ago
Seattle is home territory for perkins/coie and bobby bauer [soetoro's lawyer]. Who are the lawyers that supposedly receive the sanction cash? Perkins-coie was involved in judge carter case by sending the vela moor dud to work for carter, and they were involved with sheriff arpaio via the cvs clown morgan loew who had connections to perkins coie, and harassed sheriff Joe at the press conference."
3 February - Linda Jordan gets a former Washington Supreme Court judge to help her appeal her nearly $13,000 in court costs, one Richard B. Sanders.
(Birther Report Scribd link here)
"In good faith Ms. Jordan commenced an action to question President Obama's name on the ballot."
By presenting a mix of illegally-obtained and invalid information, along with a cut-and-paste job of the standard birther crap.
"She did the best she could with limited resources and no legal training."
Not to mention a complete disregard for "facts" or "reality".
"The government's response was immediate and in some respects heavy handed. Having obtained a summary dismissal of her case, and then her appeal, the attorney general went further to demand the Secretary of State be reimbursed, claiming attorney fees amounting to almost $13,000."
Well, they demanded it after warning if she filed an appeal, they would seek to recoup costs. She did and they did.
"However what the attorney general did not tell the court is that the Secretary never actually paid this amount, nor was he billed this amount, nor probably anything close to it. The number is made up, pure fiction. The AG did not disclose the actual amount to the court probably because the objective is to get a punitive judgment for as much as he can without regard to actual expenditures which were much less."
Actually they presented total amount of hours spent and the costs incurred.
"My motion to modify and reduce the court clerk's award of almost $13,000 will attempt to direct the court's attention to the truth of the matter: that once again the government is hiding the ball to oppress a patriotic private citizen of modest means because she exercised her right to access the courts. "
The right to access the courts doesn't mean the right to abuse the courts or to waste the courts time and taxpayer money.
So how do the inmates at Birther Report react to the news that Linda Jordan found a legal sugar daddy??
Would death threats surprise you?
"ThomasThePaine · 6 hours ago
Only armed revolt will restore then Republic. Beautify America: Decorate a tree branch with a Politician."
Richard B. Sanders has an interesting history. He lost his court seat in 2010 and lost an attempt to get it back in 2012. He seems to be a bit of a hypocrite and bigot:
"This race features the return of disgraced former justice Richard B. Sanders, who voters booted off the high court in 2010 amid charges that Sanders made racist statements and showed unforgivable hypocrisy (he voted against same-sex marriage because he said gays have "more sexual partners," but it turned out that Sanders himself had multiple simultaneous girlfriends). Whatever you do, don't vote for that cherry-picking asshole. "
And as the Stranger reported on 29 August 2012:
"As the Seattle Times revealed just before the 2010 election, Sanders had shocked colleagues by scoffing at the idea that racism sometimes causes minorities to get unfair treatment in our legal system, and by asserting that African Americans are overrepresented in our state's prisons simply because "they have a crime problem."
On top of that, as The Stranger reported just before the 2010 election, Sanders signed an opinion denying marriage rights to same-sex couples in a landmark 2006 case—because they have "more sexual partners" and because other courts have found that monogamy is "the bedrock upon which our culture is built"—even though Sanders himself has been divorced twice and was dating multiple women simultaneously during the 2010 election season."
Not to mention that he seems to have a problem with women in general:
"Which is typical Sanders. He doesn't see anything wrong with crossing lines other justices wouldn't—such as in 2003, when he visited dangerous sex offenders imprisoned on McNeil Island who had cases pending before the court and subsequently received a formal admonishment from the Commission on Judicial Conduct (this time it stuck). He also brags about how often he found himself in the minority on court opinions, though his language in some of his more famous dissents—warning about the supposed problem of young girls seducing their schoolteachers, pooh-poohing the behavior of a stalker as just overzealous flirting—has raised alarm among opponents. They ask: Is this really the kind of person you want on a court that's likely to hear plenty of cases relating to women's rights in the future?"
"In another case highlighted by Wiggins, Christensen v. Royal School District No. 160, Sanders again dissented from a seven-member majority, this time in a case involving a middle school teacher who'd had a sexual relationship with a 13-year-old student. Sanders, noting that the girl had at one point lied about the relationship, suggested she was partly to blame for what transpired. "She may be below the age of consent, but not below the age of honesty," Sanders wrote in his dissent, warning that the majority's ruling could encourage girls below the age of consent to "seduce" their teachers."
So a retired judge with a history of racist, bigoted, and misogynic comments, not to mention repeated ethical lapses. Sounds like the perfect birther attorney.
4 February - Dr. Orly has until today to respond to the Order to Show Cause in the Taitz-Berg birther civil war. Based upon this post, I'm expecting a doozy. (malware and redirect warning)
"The tide is turning: Judges are starting to rise against ObamaNazi Judges, who harass and intimidate with bogus sanctions attorneys who provide the courts with evidence of forgery in fraud in Obama’s IDs. Please, see below information on sancions brought against patriots by judges in Nazi Germany, you will see the pattern Posted on | February 4, 2013"
I suspect she's getting a might cranky with judges as a whole.
"I am submitting today a response to Judge Guilford and submitting an actual Notice of Ruling from a case in Judge Marginis regarding rule 1987.2 sanction there (currently being appealed in the Court of Appeal), as I was defamed in a minute order by Judge Guilford as attorney Berg manipulated the court and hidden from the judge the actual Notice of ruling, stating that $4,000 was under RULE 1987.2.
A bigger picture is that there is a a pattern of OBAMA-NAZI JUDGES intentionally harassing the plaintiffs with bogus sanctions in order to hide Obama’s forged IDs, judges who intentionally commit treason in aiding and abetting the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency by a foreign national with forged IDs by covering up all evidence of forgery and attempt to harass the patriots and assassinate their character by defamatory opinions and sanctions."
"Obama Nazi-Judges"?? REALLY??
And there's a reason why the judge told you your sanction was under C.C.P. sec. 1987.2 Because it WAS, and you failed to live up to even the baseline ethics of your profession.
"Retired Justice of the Supreme Court of Washington State Richard Sanders now took upon himself representation of pro se plaintiff Linda Jordan, who was similarly harassed by Obama-Nazi judges in the state of Washington."
Ah, so Dr. Orly is also supporting an ousted ethically-challenged former judge with a history of racist, bigoted, and sexist comments. Good to know.
"If we do not rise against Obama and Obama-Nazi judges, Obama-Nazi officials and controlled Obama-Nazi media, the regime will become more bald, after they realise that they cannot silence with monetary sanctions the civil rights leaders standing up to usurper Obama, they will incarcerate the civil rights leaders deeming them domestic terrorists under the NDAA. this is why it is so important to rise against this Nazi regime of the usurper Obama. Monetary sanctions, economic losses will be followed by the loss of liberty and loss of life. Let us not forget that Hitler came to power in 1932, the actual mass incarcerations and Holocaust did not happen until 1942."
Dear Gods in heaven, she's absolutely gone completely around the bend. Not to mention historically inaccurate. You see, the Nuremberg laws were enacted in 1935. Kristallnacht was in 1938, and 30,000 were sent to places like Dachau (opened in 1933), Sachsenhausen (opened in 1936), Buchenwald (1937), and Oranienburg (1934). Wholesale extermination in the camps didn't take place until 1942, but the mass incarcerations of the Shoah had been happening before then, and it wasn't unusual for Jews in Poland and Russia to be shot out of hand.
"There is a peculiar coincidence. One of my relatives was a translator at Nuremberg trials. He spoke 5 languages: Russian, German, English, French and Moldovan(Romanian) which is very close to Italian. Another translator worked as a professor at the Punahoa school in Hawaii and taught Obama. So both of us got the same information, same fact pattern, but made different conclusions. Obama’s conclusion from the Nuremberg trials is that one can still achieve the deprivation of rights of citizens by making it more seamless, more gradual, using more fraud, forgery, falsification of records and the most corrupt individuals as officials and judges. My conclusion is that tyranny and deprivation of rights cannot last forever, that criminals do get caught and tried and pay with their lives sooner or later.
I believe my conclusion is correct. What do you think?"
I think you're a delusional paranoid racist nitrous-huffing waste of skin with delusions of grandeur, and I can't wait to see your reaction on January 20th, 2017 when Barack Obama steps down after his second term and it hits you that you've completely wasted almost 9 years of your life.
4 February - Kelly Lincoln provides a video rebuttal to Linda Jordan's extended whine about having to pay almost $13,000 in court fees.
"OMG!!!! OMG!!!! OMG!!!! OMG!!!! HOW DARE THEY!!!!! Linda Jordan, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT is whinging about getting FINED $13,000 for ignoring a Court Order about refiling a FRIVOLOUS LAWSUIT!!!!
Linda, you are an EMBARRASSMENT TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, AND YOU NEED TO APOLOGIZE FOR WASTING THE TAXPAYER'S TIME AND MONEY ON THIS CRAP. You NEVER filed in GOOD FAITH, and your SOLE purpose is to harass and annoy the People of Washington State and the Courts. Grow the hell up."
As a Washington State taxpayer, I'm quite okay with their going after Linda Jordan for attorney fees for wasting the courts time and taxpayer money with her birther jihad.
I'm just sorry she's not looking at jail time for her illegal use of E-Verify as well.
Jordan - Bed, made, lie.